Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
They wouldn't worry about that too much. They'll get currency for Stringer, maybe Shiel. Can also trade F3 F4 at certain points for specific players if they want.Great post, another factor to consider is each clubs draft hand vs their list spots. they need to draft 3 players at least and doing that at pick 9 + 88 + 104 etc isn't ideal
1000%. You've got a team that finished 7th, add Barrass, Battle, and pick 9 and you're in serious business. Would also allow them to get back into the first round after trading for Barrass.Jeez, if I were hawthorn I'd be trying to make that trade happen. Addressed their biggest weakness by bringing in to high quality KPDs and could add another promising mid to an already talented group.
That would be a massive haul for a team that narrowly missed a prelim with extrem upside.
Plus F2? Getting a little overs, but fine
Who is offering more?Thanks for posting. It is basically IN DETAIL what I have been saying for a while.
Yes we would love the Don's Pick 9, BUT so would many other clubs, many of whom can actually offer more.
There is no way that we get Pick 9 cheaply.
Potentially. But they won’t get much at all out of those two and getting back in late will cost a fortune still.They wouldn't worry about that too much. They'll get currency for Stringer, maybe Shiel. Can also trade F3 F4 at certain points for specific players if they want.
He doesn’t get it from the club … he gets the info from the opposition about that club. Leaks, players innocently answering qns from the next recruiter, interviews, so onInteresting, in a competition where you have to find ways to beat your opponent ... I really don't see what gain there is by leaking who we are going to pick up.
I'd be more inclined to try to throw the opposition off as much as possible, not lay down a road for your opponents to be fully prepared.
Catching up on some pages. You and others have the patience of a saintBy far the best thing Essendon can do is cash pick 9 into next year's draft where it will be immunised from any Kako bid. Splitting it and pushing it back into this draft does not maximise value, as your example shows.
Who is offering more?
If we don’t come out of trade week with Soldo’s missus it will be an unmitigated disaster.If we walk out of trade week with 7, 8, 9 and Macrae and nothing else (including a future first) I’ll be stoked.
If we walk out with 7, 8 and 27 and Macrae I’ll be equally happy.
If we walk about with 7, 8 and swap 27 for the dogs second (35) I’ll still be happy, slightly less so but still happy.
Wed need to go full saints to **** it up from where we are.
Jay Clark reporting -
At this stage GWS has three list spots available and could look to package together picks 15, 16, 21 and 37 to help jump up the order with a club such as St Kilda, which has picks seven and eight.
Would give us plenty of ammo to get 9.
7,9,15,16
It would. But why would GWS be that generous?
Pick 16 +37 is the same amount of points as pick 8. Why would GWS also throw in 15 and 21 which are worth more than pick 8 in themselves ? That is paying more than double. Yes you expect a premium to go lower, but I doubt that they are that desperate.
Because they have a shit ton of random picks that they won't use. They're already locked into Logan Smith as an academy pick, and are likely to take a 2nd academy player in Cooper Bell. That means they only need to use 2-4 other picks and I suspect we'll probably swap some late picks back tooIt would. But why would GWS be that generous?
Pick 16 +37 is the same amount of points as pick 8. Why would GWS also throw in 15 and 21 which are worth more than pick 8 in themselves ? That is paying more than double. Yes you expect a premium to go lower, but I doubt that they are that desperate.
Points are irrelevant and as proven by essendons comments today.It would. But why would GWS be that generous?
Pick 16 +37 is the same amount of points as pick 8. Why would GWS also throw in 15 and 21 which are worth more than pick 8 in themselves ? That is paying more than double. Yes you expect a premium to go lower, but I doubt that they are that desperate.
What would GWS be targeting? they usually pick from 'their own talent order' which I assume is players willing to go to Sydney, their strategy has produced some bolters in the past.Jay Clark reporting -
At this stage GWS has three list spots available and could look to package together picks 15, 16, 21 and 37 to help jump up the order with a club such as St Kilda, which has picks seven and eight.
Would give us plenty of ammo to get 9.
7,9,15,16
Is that for just one of our top 10 picksJay Clark reporting -
At this stage GWS has three list spots available and could look to package together picks 15, 16, 21 and 37 to help jump up the order with a club such as St Kilda, which has picks seven and eight.
Would give us plenty of ammo to get 9.
7,9,15,16
Gotta be Travaglia given they're losing Cumming and Perryman as half back/wingers or maybe ReidWhat would GWS be targeting? they usually pick from 'their own talent order' which I assume is players willing to go to Sydney, their strategy has produced some bolters in the past.
If who they are targeting isn't the same type as ours then sweet, do the deal and slide back to 9 and we can get the same player there anyway and add an extra pick or two.