OldFoss78
Rookie
- Sep 5, 2020
- 25
- 106
- AFL Club
- Carlton
DGB or Phillips...... Both desisted by hawks
Phillips
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DGB or Phillips...... Both desisted by hawks
I'd take McMahon before either of them, but probably Phillips if I had to choose.DGB or Phillips...... Both desisted by hawks
Tye HouriganDGB or Phillips...... Both desisted by hawks
Tye Hourigan
Heās the best country footballer Iāve seen. I think he could play in the AFL for sure. Heās 6ā3 and a bit, he can play on talls or smalls, heās an elite mark, he runs a 6:20 2km, heās got pace, heās an elite user and he reads the footy better than anyone Iāve seen. There is no weakness.āā
An official from an opposition Gippsland league club said of Hourigan: āEverything is one-touch clean. He kicks the footy like a mule ā hits a bloke on the chest with a 60m drop-punt ā and heāll pick the ball up at pace below his knees, sidestep someone coming the other way and off he goes. āHeās as good a key position player as Iāve seen at our level.āā
I think that would have got him stuck at Port.All he had to do was say āI wish to be traded to Carltonā
What an idiot.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
VFL clubs have sounded him out in the past two years but heās been content to play for the Maroons as he completes his university studies to be a schoolteacher
Charlie Clarke delisted after only two years by the Dogs.
Highly regarded in his draft class, had a decent year at VFL level, still only 20 years old.
Worth a serious look IMO.
Don't think he would have got stuck there. Player's/their partners usually get to where they want these days. Think it was more that he didn't want to put Port in that position. Would have cost them more.I think that would have got him stuck at Port.
I see they also let go their MSD small forward Kelsey Rypstra.Don't know much about Clarke but it's a position of need.
His stats look OK.
Not if we are keeping our first round pick for the draft. They would not have done it for less. That's why his manager did not go this way. Nominating a club does not mean you get there for SFA.Don't think he would have got stuck there. Player's/their partners usually get to where they want these days. Think it was more that he didn't want to put Port in that position. Would have cost them more.
On SM-G980F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I think it's refreshing that a player does not drop the now clichĆ©d response that implies 'at all costs'. I hate players thinking that they are bigger than the clubs.All he had to do was say āI wish to be traded to Carltonā
What an idiot.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Cats thought he wasn't good enough, Port have now decided the same. Average at getting it and well below average at using it. There might be a home for him somewhere but it's definitely not with us.
I don't know what Hogan has to do with anything. Hogan was once rated in the top few players in his age group and never exactly lost his talent. It's not a like-for-like comparison.Jesse Hogan says hi
Players only nominate when the club the want to go to is willing to trade fairly for them. The do it to break tight locks. If he nominated us, we would have offered second and third round picks and it would not have got done, he would have ended up at Collingwood last minute or got stuck in SA with egg in his face. It was not a situation where a player nominates.Don't think he would have got stuck there. Player's/their partners usually get to where they want these days. Think it was more that he didn't want to put Port in that position. Would have cost them more.
On SM-G980F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I was on the McKay bandwagon from way back but only because I knew Weideman would slip between our picks. I had him just a smidge ahead. With what we had, I wanted Weitering, Francis (though I pushed back strongly on the idea going around that he'd be a perfect fit for our first pick) and McKay. I never wanted us to draft Schache, not because of anything I saw in his game, I just didn't think he'd pass the interview process.I remember being so disappointed when we missed out on him on draft nite and ended up with the consolation prize in Harry McKay....
Thanks. I was more referring to the being "stuck" at PA, not him nominating or not nominating us.Players only nominate when the club the want to go to is willing to trade fairly for them. The do it to break tight locks. If he nominated us, we would have offered second and third round picks and it would not have got done, he would have ended up at Collingwood last minute or got stuck in SA with egg in his face. It was not a situation where a player nominates.
I also meant to say that I don't think he was going to nominate anyone, as that would have tied Ports hands somewhat, in that the "nominee" could say "right, give us what we want or he stays where he really doesn't want to be.Thanks. I was more referring to the being "stuck" at PA, not him nominating or not nominating us.
I just don't think these days that clubs will make a player stay when their heart or mind is somwhere else especially when "partners" are involved, which is why I mentioned it in my initial post.
I was under the impression (be it wrong or not) that the want to get to Victoria was "primarily" driven by his partner. Could be wrong.
There was no way, as I see it, that he was going to nominate us at any time.
He wanted to play for us. Talked with Vossy & Crippa from what I've heard, and they wanted him. Our LM team said no, we are taking a different path. Both Dan and his manager would have been informed of that and probably suggest he go to his next option, which was Collingwood.
On SM-G980F using BigFooty.com mobile app
No current season stats available
Yep, would have only nominated us if the deal was close.Thanks. I was more referring to the being "stuck" at PA, not him nominating or not nominating us.
I just don't think these days that clubs will make a player stay when their heart or mind is somwhere else especially when "partners" are involved, which is why I mentioned it in my initial post.
I was under the impression (be it wrong or not) that the want to get to Victoria was "primarily" driven by his partner. Could be wrong.
There was no way, as I see it, that he was going to nominate us at any time.
He wanted to play for us. Talked with Vossy & Crippa from what I've heard, and they wanted him. Our LM team said no, we are taking a different path. Both Dan and his manager would have been informed of that and probably suggest he go to his next option, which was Collingwood.
On SM-G980F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I think it's refreshing that a player does not drop the now clichƩd response that implies 'at all costs'. I hate players thinking that they are bigger than the clubs.