- Mar 20, 2017
- 10,939
- 36,938
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I'm getting major league chicken sacrifice vibes.Yep he's all good provided he offers appropriate sacrifices during the season
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm getting major league chicken sacrifice vibes.Yep he's all good provided he offers appropriate sacrifices during the season
So, you're saying with a full list to choose from, Ollie misses out on a starting spot??
Weāll see!
Hope Ollie has himself a strength regimen heās invested in.
The brissy team he captained was a brutal finals outfit that was happy for Port to win minor premierships. I imagine he's running the same logic here.We chose a totally cooked version of Cincotta who was horrible and Kennedy as sub who was horrible. Dropped fit, form players who brought much needed pace and run for other fringe players who were not fit and brought no run at all.
Fisher and Dow had performed well in a big game just prior to finals against Melbourne, a game that was practically a final so the not big game players goes out the window.
Voss did exactly the same thing this year. Went back to his favorites despite slowing the team down and them not having fitness or form. The only difference was we got smashed instead of scraping out two wins. Wins which came mostly because both opposition kicked horribly for goal.
A lot of people blinded by winning a couple of finals. If 2023 was successful then the bar most certainly is low. We would have been marginally better with more pace. My opinion won't change on that. The last two seasons, every time we inject even a little pace into the team it improves significantly. We picked the slowest side we could for finals, struggled through two finals, won with a lot of luck involved and were outpaced in the prelim. Melbourne and/or Sydney don't have a mare in front of goal in 2023 and there would be more people agreeing with me.
Voss is proving that when it comes to finals, he falls back to his 'safe' options. Rather than sticking with players who bring improvement to the side and have good performances under their belt he has proven last year and this year that he falls back to his safe options. I would definitely call that choking. That and being afraid to play the young players all season. It wreaks of fear poor confidence.
The fact that Voss has this mantra of "finals are different" wreaks of fear. The idea that finals are different is BS. They are different for the first 10 minutes because everyone goes super hard. Fundamentals are the same. Game is the same.
I don't trust Voss to select the team well each week and I certainly don't trust him to get it right come finals. He's too reliant on favorites/players he rates at the expense of team balance and form/fitness. He's proven this over and over again. It's a weakness in his coaching.
I've gone over it before, the selections throughout the season and particularly in this and last years finals series being poor. They took the pace out of the team. They took away the run off half back and in the middle. Cuningham is the other selection which we got wrong in 2023. He was probably our best defensive half forward and we got smashed off the half back line. In the end it's up to the coach to pick a side that is fit, has form and has a really good team balance and he's failed to do that because he can't stop himself picking his favorites.
Think bringing in a bunch of underdone players and resting Kennedy was a gamble which didn't pay off. Ideally we have our best players all fit and firing come September...that wasn't available to us this year.
Biggest issue for mine still is our structures and gameplan, not the personnel choices. When forced to kick to Kemp as our main target, we showed that we can have dynamic ball movement. A good coaching team will make us look even more dangerous when we have Charlie and Harry back int he side...not back to one dimension.
We have the cattle to have good forward movement, it's a sub-optimal gameplan that is the issue.
No current season stats available
Sorry I should have been clearerā¦I can definitely see us going backwards in 2025 (and heaven help those at the club if we do), but I just donāt think the moves the club have made during the trade period are indicative of that.It is a difficult equation for me to simplify because too many variables
1. No doubt injuries played a huge role in the ability of the team to perform to its best - which begs the question(s) about Russell and medical recovery regime AGAIN ( so exit Russell and Medico ) and
on the coaching group ( which has been left alone )
2. The above however combined with VFL performance underlines the lack of depth coming through
so it IS logical that teh Club invests in new youth via draft - I have no idea about how good or not the Campos are likely to be but two new kids at cheapo pick prices was a good start and then having 12 and 14 was a great 2 pick combo in a so called deep draft
so adding to depth tick box looking good
cutting perpetually injured players - another tick in the box
cutting never gunna make its from VFL - another good tick in the box
adding Haynes- a big MEH for me - Ive watched him play for years now as I follow both GW and Sydney closely - Haynes is cover for McGovern as an interceptor and maybe Kemp too - but he isnt a second KPD in any shape or form and he is injury prone and he is old
3. Then we see Houston available at high price- fair enough walk away and keep 12 and 14 as draft picks
BUT - selling them down to get only 1 pick- that is a high risk move for a team wanting to add depth ...
so my Houston V a high draft pick
and the Club went for the high draft pick - which means to me that investing in future balanced against the now took priority - fair enough...
I can see Carlton going backwards in 2025 quite easily - with question marks over fitness of Walsh/Cerra and bunch of others ...forget pre-season - your top players have to play most games during the year if not all..
Voss has never had tam continuity to play with so fingers crossed the team gives him some- because no doubt in my mind - he is under the gun big time.
The brissy team he captained was a brutal finals outfit that was happy for Port to win minor premierships. I imagine he's running the same logic here.
On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
if it's personnel, why did it look better when Charlie and McKay weren't in the side? When we only had Kemp as a target, the team showed that if forced, they can find leading targets i50.Not sure where you are coming from here tbh. Brissy were on a winning streak and cherry ripe, we were on a losing streak and hanging together with bandaids. Was never going to happen.
Literally think we have the least capable delivery into F50 in the league. We had no pressure forward available either. Also was basically locked in our D50 for the first half.
This is a personnel issue (F50 delivery) more than anything, possibly a training issue too. Hopefully skills are a focus over the break. Down back we did great all year, just that defensively we didnt ask our midfield to help out much, preferring them to position to be more attacking. This allowed us to be a great turnover team most of the year. Little bit foolsgoldy tho imo.
Hopefully Boyd finds form again, Doch gets back to serviceable, and Haynes frees up Weiters a bit. With these three kicking, we will have a good switch option and force the forward pressure teams back a bit allowing us to exit D50. Houston wohkdve been great, tho glad we didnt spend up here. Weiters is a great interceptor and kick, just needs to be 1v1 instead of 1v3. No trust in confidence players like McGovern to play this role consistently.
On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Against two of the sh***est sides in the AFL is why.if it's personnel, why did it look better when Charlie and McKay weren't in the side? When we only had Kemp as a target, the team showed that if forced, they can find leading targets i50.
Go read my team post...
accurate but kemp also lead towards the ball carrier, rther than standing and wrestling and waiting for the high ball.Against two of the sh***est sides in the AFL is why.
So do Charlie and Harry. Difference is they have genuine gun defenders stuck to them like glue every second they're on the ground with others in their leading lanes to prevent them too.accurate but kemp also lead towards the ball carrier, rther than standing and wrestling and waiting for the high ball.
if we can bring that into the mix, one leading and one or two engaging the body it immediately makes entry into the f50 more dynamic and less obvious
Sure thing, that would be in the https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2025-best-23-emergencies-rolling.1387405/ thread, yes???
Yeah, right before your question on Ollie being in the starting team...
Thought this would be of interest to those that mentioned his name as a possible DFA.
I heard a combination of Calf's blood and Peptides works wonders...Yep he's all good provided he offers appropriate sacrifices during the season
I think people take a high draft pick as a given future elite player way way too much for granted- when the evidence over decades suggests it is a goodish bet that the player becomes okish - maybe - if all goes well. Peopel can point to teh high picks that are great - but forget the many more that are total duds.I think you're looking at the Houston thing the wrong way. By trading up to Pick #3 we're clearly looking to add another ELITE cog to our side. That's why you trade 12 and 14 for #3, because we want to get a look at an elite player not just young depth.
When considering why we chose Pick #3 over Houston the decision was pretty clear. Both give us an option at an elite player to add to our side, the difference being that one is a half back flanker and would be on close to $1m a year and the other is (likely to be) a midfielder and on a rookie wage.
I suspect it was more the cash and potentially the positional need (needing midfield pace over backline support) steered us down the path of Pick #3 over Houston, but what we were looking to add was an elite player - that's pretty clear.
Regardless. That's clearly what the club is looking for. But i disagree with your position. I think Pick #3 has a clearly better chance of landing elite players.I think people take a high draft pick as a given future elite player way way too much for granted- when the evidence over decades suggests it is a goodish bet that the player becomes okish - maybe - if all goes well. Peopel can point to teh high picks that are great - but forget the many more that are total duds.
Is it like that or is it that Charlie does not lead or bit of both perhaps.Looking forward to when Charlie is regularly hit up on a lead rather than having it bombed on his head for a wrestling match.