4th Test Border Gavaskar Trophy December 26-30 1000hrs @ the MCG

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah I don’t understand why numbers are becoming some sort of
Emoji. Weird


On iPhone using ][emoji6]][emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]BigFooty.com mobile app

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Which is why i am not certain Ussie goes yet, if he does going back to the guy who just got dropped for nothing being up to it without going back and playing shield cricket seems stupid.

IF they are certain they need to make the change i would have more confidence in Hunt over Sydney.

As much as he's looked good this year, it's also worth remembering Hunt is off two years where he averaged ~20 odd in the shield.

Seeing where Australia's batting stocks are, I'd be comfortable going back to McSweeney as an opener, providing we're committed to Konstas as his partner (and are willing to give him a long leash). As much as you can say the lack of scoring shots, that's more to do with Australia having little-to-no answers to Bumrah, who in turn is having that kind of series that cements someone's legacy of being a generational bowler.

After all, it's not like Labs, Khawaja or even Smith (until he has been set and with an old ball) have faired any better.
 
][emoji[emoji6]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]]" data-quote="magpiemaniac[emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]]" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
I'd probably stick with Usman till the end of the WTC cycle, then look to make the switch

What’s more important to us. Prepping for the Ashes or the WTC?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

$10 tickets announced for tomorrow! I'll definitely head in now if I can get something semi-decent, we might end up with a good finish.

Or it might turn into a dud...
 
As much as he's looked good this year, it's also worth remembering Hunt is off two years where he averaged ~20 odd in the shield.

Seeing where Australia's batting stocks are, I'd be comfortable going back to McSweeney as an opener, providing we're committed to Konstas as his partner (and are willing to give him a long leash). As much as you can say the lack of scoring shots, that's more to do with Australia having little-to-no answers to Bumrah, who in turn is having that kind of series that cements someone's legacy of being a generational bowler.

After all, it's not like Labs, Khawaja or even Smith (until he has been set and with an old ball) have faired any better.
I totally agree which is why I don’t think Hunt is a great option yet.

Problem with going back to Mcsweeney is dropping him once i think does no damage to his reputation. Dropping him a a second time for failing can.

The thing is every single one of those batsman has gotten set and made some sort of score at least once this series. Sydney hasn't managed that (with one less test admittedly.) Usman can go but someone has to kick him out and i am yet to see anyone do that.
 
Both he and Marnus are definitely in the spectrum - they are signalling to no one
Played with a guy who was . Did very similar things, very figgity and repeated movements.
Would call for new gloves every few overs and would get very fixated on the wind direction plus he had to count the fielders every over.

Was very annoying to bat with.
I reckon Marnus also copies Smith .
 
I reckon Konstas will follow the usual path of Australian bats that end up having a solid career. Make a series of low scores, get dropped and go back to shield to work on some things then come back a more well rounded player.
Wouldn't surprise me.
I'm not being critical but we need to be realistic .
 
Wouldn't surprise me.
I'm not being critical but we need to be realistic .

I wonder how much that first innings was a bit of an insight into his ‘coping mechanisms’ for want of a better term, for when things are tough at the crease?

So he goes out there, Bumrah has him in trouble first over. His immediate default - and admittedly it worked at that stage - was to go completely unorthodox and not just be aggressive but totally off the wall with the shots he was playing.

So does he have another default mode to go into when he’s up against it (that’s a genuine question, I’ve not watched him) where he can leave everything and block a lot, or shelve certain shots until the ball softens etc etc? Or does he need to add some versatility/flexibility to his repertoire. Hes got ability so he could learn that on the run if he doesn’t already have those tools
 

Remove this Banner Ad

4th Test Border Gavaskar Trophy December 26-30 1000hrs @ the MCG

Back
Top