- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
Ideallist!30 pages of whinging about Stephenson’s “HTB” when he actually kicks the ball
A) Watching the game and B) knowing the rules are usually good first steps when complaining about umpires.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ideallist!30 pages of whinging about Stephenson’s “HTB” when he actually kicks the ball
A) Watching the game and B) knowing the rules are usually good first steps when complaining about umpires.
Classy comment on a couple of mature and good natured teenagersMcGuire’s sons have the most punchable faces i’ve ever seen
Flag favourites just scrape over the line, after a big lead, with some of the most favourable umpiring they are ever likely to get.
Honest Pies fans would probably realise that Bombers are likely to worry them in finals.
the dogs game was only 2 weeks agoPies were their own worst enemy. If they were more accurate at shots at goal would not have been as close as it was, umpire decisions or not. We're not playing our best football, prob the worst we have played since the dogs game.
Essendon showing good signs for the rest of the season though. We held on and scraped through with the win, against the pressure.
exactly lol That was terrible. We had a great game last week. But not the best today. I'm sure they'll get their rhythm right more and more. All the while, you take the wins where you can get them.the dogs game was only 2 weeks ago
We kicked 2.10 from set shots. Not worried. Umpiring didn’t directly give collingwood a goal, essendon got 2-3 from them. Two absolutely questionable ones as well. Not sure what all the noise about favourable umpiring is.. was poor both ways the whole gameFlag favourites just scrape over the line, after a big lead, with some of the most favourable umpiring they are ever likely to get.
Honest Pies fans would probably realise that Bombers are likely to worry them in finals.
Actually the name is Larry.No worries Eddie
thought Steve Hocking was gonna stop the booing
someone needs to tell the umpires then because 9 times out of 10 if someone has an arm free and an arm held they will penalise them.LOL
The hint is in the name ‘Prior’ is before being tackled.
Stephenson was almost being held before he took possession of the ball, he had no prior opportunity at all to dispose of the ball before being tackled.
Thus all he has to do is attempt to dispose of it...he did try to get it on his boot when lying on the ground.
And as per 15.2.4(e) if pulled down by one arm without prior opportunity and the ball spills free it is play on
So if the umpire thought he tried to get ball to boot = play on
If umpire thought the tackle itself knocked the ball free = play on
The only way that could be adjudged ‘holding the ball’ is if he didn’t think Stephenson even attempted to correctly dispose of the ball.
Play on 9 times out of 10
even if he did get a toe on it, the disposal must come within a reasonable time frame. Taking steps then falling to the ground was long enoughafter re-reviewing the footage He gets boot on that, play on.
As far as bad decisions go that wasn't even in the top 10 today
someone needs to tell the umpires then because 9 times out of 10 if someone has an arm free and an arm held they will penalise them.
Tell me, if a player received the ball and was tackled around the waste immediately, but had their hands free to handball, would they be penalised if they just held the ball? Of course they would. Having an option to dispose of the ball when tackled is just as important as prior opportunity, which is primarily used if a player is tackled and has no opportunity to dispose of the ball. Their opportunity to dispose of the ball was prior to the tackle, not during it.
I think my favorite part of the whole thing is pies fans who were adamant last season that higgins goty was a throw are now saying 'nah stephenson threw it and got the tiniest bit of boot to the ball so that's fine'
Yeah if they don’t attempt to dispose of the ball that is holding the ball.Tell me, if a player received the ball and was tackled around the waste immediately, but had their hands free to handball, would they be penalised if they just held the ball?
You are just making things up that are wrong.Of course they would. Having an option to dispose of the ball when tackled is just as important as prior opportunity, which is primarily used if a player is tackled and has no opportunity to dispose of the ball. Their opportunity to dispose of the ball was prior to the tackle, not during it.
Flag favourites just scrape over the line, after a big lead, with some of the most favourable umpiring they are ever likely to get.
Honest Pies fans would probably realise that Bombers are likely to worry them in finals.
An opportunity to dispose of the ball is the relevant thing. This opportunity can be prior to the tackle or once tackled. If the tackle locks the ball in and the players cannot dispose of the ball once tackled they can be penalised if they had a chance to dispose of the ball prior to the tackle. OR their opportunity to dispose of the ball can be after they are tackled if the player has an option eg: hand or hands free.Yeah if they don’t attempt to dispose of the ball that is holding the ball.
You are just making things up that are wrong.
Prior opportunity before the tackle is THE important thing. If you have had prior opportunity and are correctly tackled you must correctly dispose of the ball.
If you haven’t had prior opportunity, ie Stephenson who was tackled immediately, all he has to do is attempt to get rid of it, which he did.
Play on the correct call.
both sides were gifted a few shots at goal through 50/50 frees. We just happened to kick oursEspecially with Fantasia back in the mix.
An honest Person would also say bombers were gifted three goals from frees which were highly dubious also.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app