Are saying inaccuracy has no impact on a game?A simplistic way of thinking. If one of those behinds was a goal, it would have gone back to the centre, an area we dominated, the margin may have been bigger
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are saying inaccuracy has no impact on a game?A simplistic way of thinking. If one of those behinds was a goal, it would have gone back to the centre, an area we dominated, the margin may have been bigger
Good call.Hawks to go away with this, no way Bombers run this out.
Yep.I think once we get into the swing of things we will cause teams sone issues. You guys probably match up better than anybody to us.
Lol. You went early, now having a decent cry after you were called out on it.Bombers aren’t making the 8.
Still want more Andronicus?
im saying the game completely changes if one of those behinds were a goalAre saying inaccuracy has no impact on a game?
If we go on what actually happened, essendon dominated the centre clearances. The game would have been different if even one of those points was a goal.Problem with this thinking is that Hawthorn won the first possession from centre bounces, but didn’t win the clearances.
It’s why Reeves ended with a higher amount of Hits to advantage, yet we lost the centre bounce clearances.
Hawks fumbled, stumbled or lost the ball numerous times in the middle, but does it happen every time if they were to turn every one of those points into a goal? Probably not.