Rumour AFL not happy with Tex criticism of MRO. Sanction could loom.

[Thetrader15]

Seriously, how hard is it for the AFL/MRO/tribunal?

Dirty, intentional incidents get weeks.

Accidents are part of the game.

 

[LC40]

He won't get a ban, but he will be reprimanded and a fine, which he should.

Why should he?
The matter was dealt with and Tex gave an honest reply when asked a question on a radio station.
There is no need to fine or reprimand him.

Home – Triple M

www.triplem.com.au

This was a non issue until McClure intimated it will be looked at by the AFL. It follows his modus operandi, he has form on this crap concerning the AFC... the vague insinuation suggesting further action.

It was an easy snipe really because as Arrowman pointed out :

To be fair (and I cringe at being fair to McClure) it's entirely plausible - likely, in fact. The AFL does not take kindly to players and coaches publicly criticising MRO decisions.

I'm betting his thinking was along those lines also.

Geoffa32 said it concisely

If this is the one source of the AFL being unhappy, it is BS.


Purely an opinion piece and just McClure sinking the boots in.


No basis at all.

 

[Miss Vanessa]

When the AFL passes these two off as "nothing to see here", this is where you end up.





Yet they are more concerned about players having a different opinion to them.

There is no bigger disconnect in football than how football commentators and the AFL administration perceive Joel Selwood and how the general football going public perceive him. He is such an outrageously dirty player that it beggars belief that he could be the NAB Auskick ambassador… as if he personifies what it should mean to be an AFL footballer. Jebus.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

The Roar agrees with Tex.

Six Points: Even stars need to be called out for dog acts, and Port Adelaide's path forward is clear

We're only eight-ninths through the action of Easter weekend, but more than enough has already happened to get tongues wagging while we wait for…

www.theroar.com.au

 

[GameofSloanes]

Why should he?
The matter was dealt with and Tex gave an honest reply when asked a question on a radio station.
There is no need to fine or reprimand him.

Home – Triple M

www.triplem.com.au

This was a non issue until McClure intimated it will be looked at by the AFL. It follows his modus operandi, he has form on this crap concerning the AFC... the vague insinuation suggesting further action.

It was an easy snipe really because as Arrowman pointed out :

I'm betting his thinking was along those lines also.

Geoffa32 said it concisely

Think it is still a non issue. 5AA said they rang the crows and the AFL and they said there was nothing to comment about. McClure making stuff up again

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

 

[FR0GGY]

Mattrox posted here didn’t he?

 

[GROTTO]

Think it is still a non issue. 5AA said they rang the crows and the AFL and they said there was nothing to comment about. McClure making stuff up again

Time to call out again the f**kwit reporter.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Time to call out again the f**kwit reporter.

Needs more Campbell Brown.

 

[DJ75]

There is no bigger disconnect in football than how football commentators and the AFL administration perceive Joel Selwood and how the general football going public perceive him. He is such an outrageously dirty player that it beggars belief that he could be the NAB Auskick ambassador… as if he personifies what it should mean to be an AFL footballer. Jebus.

Don't forget the eye gouge on Riley Knight either. Controlling umpire was made aware immediately on field. No report made. Incident not even looked at.

 

[FR0GGY]

Think it is still a non issue. 5AA said they rang the crows and the AFL and they said there was nothing to comment about. McClure making stuff up again

He’s trying to make it an issue.

 

[Jirkago75]

It must be the conspiracy theorist in me but this come out and a few day later, they talk about North and priority picks. The easy way to sanction the crows and Tex over this and then to give north a heads up.

 

[Burtonsgottago]

And this time, the club should stick up for Tex and ask it’s own questions why our players can be kicked and it go unpunished.

Crows don’t stick up for their players

 

[flashcrow]

Crows don’t stick up for their players

Yeah, that's why they never appeal at the tribunal.

 

[Crow till I die]

Crows don’t stick up for their players

you don't remember THAT DAY at the tribunal when Mackay broke the internet then?

 

[Sanders]

Mattrox posted here didn’t he?

That’s a name from the past. Where did you pluck that from?

 

[FR0GGY]

That’s a name from the past. Where did you pluck that from?

The tweet. When you click on it.

 

[John Who]

Plot twist:
The MRO is actually McClure himself!

 

[John Who]

Time to call out again the f**kwit reporter.

If the AFL remains quiet, then that’s basically McClure calling himself out. Btw, I do think you are being mean to all the ****wit reporters when mentioning McClure among that group.

 

[ams4crows]

The entire footy classified Panel including Eddie reckon that Cotchin was just protecting himself and didn't "Kick" him and shouldn't have even been fined.

 

[texanmike]

The entire footy classified Panel including Eddie reckon that Cotchin was just protecting himself and didn't "Kick" him and shouldn't have even been fined.

Why watch the garbage, you already know what they are going to say, the competition is still the VFL as far as I’m concerned. any interstate club that wins a premiership in this day and age it is worth 3 premierships, it’s that hard to win with all the legs up vic clubs get.

 

[flashcrow]

The entire footy classified Panel including Eddie reckon that Cotchin was just protecting himself and didn't "Kick" him and shouldn't have even been fined.

I knew that mob were bad but FMD

 

[Sanders]

The tweet. When you click on it.

Not for me.

 

[Sanders]

The entire footy classified Panel including Eddie reckon that Cotchin was just protecting himself and didn't "Kick" him and shouldn't have even been fined.

Protecting himself from…?

 

[StickerMan]

6 foot 4 bloke coming at Trent with murderous intent: according to Eddie.

I shit you not


On SM-G986B using BigFooty.com mobile app