Game Day AFL Round 18 - Collingwood vs Adelaide Matchday Discussion (MCG - 4.40pm)

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Even a slightly unfit Kennedy would be better than Blair.
Just stick him in the forward pocket and let him sneak a few goals.
F**k it. It's time for me to return to Aus and take over the coaching job at Collingwood.
Blair better make me eat my words today or I could go on a rant which will bore the crap out of all you unfortunate fellow posters.
 
Every time Kennedy is announced as the sub I actually feel completely deflated and almost want the team to lose (not really, but you understand). How much longer are we going to have to deal with this crap.
 
Kennedy the sub? Has that been confirmed? If thats the case im truly disenchated with whats going on down there.

Not confidant, if we dont hit the scoreboard early and get some confidence i can see this being another long frustrating afternoon.
Yep. It's on the club's twitter feed.
 
Every time Kennedy is announced as the sub I actually feel completely deflated and almost want the team to lose (not really, but you understand). How much longer are we going to have to deal with this crap.
I'm actually a little worried that we could loose him because of it. He still not re-signed and both South Australian clubs are on record as being interested (in both him and Broomhead). If he keeps getting the sub vest he may request a trade home for more opportunity.
 
Whilst I can understand BenKen as sub it still pisses me off.

I know players and coaches are in constant communication but surely any player becomes disenchanted when he has a really good gsme then is sub the following 2 weeks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Kennedy is a good impact player but fact remains he is a better player than Blair. So why play him for only 20% of the game? If true its typical of the crap coaching lately
 
Well can't make everyone happy. Sub would normally be one from Martin, Broom or BenKen.
With Swan out, didn't ever think it would be Blair.
As much as I hate to admit it Kennedy does make more sense as the sub rather than Blair. Blair is really a one dimensional type of player, and if we don't get any injury, the idea of the sub is to come on between the 3rd & 4th quarter to create a bit of run and have an impact. Blair isn't quick, nor is he an impact player. My feeling on him is that he is either best 21 or not selected.
 
Whilst I can understand BenKen as sub it still pisses me off.

I know players and coaches are in constant communication but surely any player becomes disenchanted when he has a really good gsme then is sub the following 2 weeks.

However impressive bucks is in the media, his team selection, positioning of those players truly baffles the mind.
 
Well can't make everyone happy. Sub would normally be one from Martin, Broom or BenKen.
With Swan out, didn't ever think it would be Blair.
I agree. If you think about the experience that we lost from the side this week, it was always going to be one of the three you mentioned (all young and inexperienced).

Bucks is a master troll; good to see the same posters lose their shit before the game has even started.
 
As much as I hate to admit it Kennedy does make more sense as the sub rather than Blair. Blair is really a one dimensional type of player, and if we don't get any injury, the idea of the sub is to come on between the 3rd & 4th quarter to create a bit of run and have an impact. Blair isn't quick, nor is he an impact player. My feeling on him is that he is either best 21 or not selected.

So what u basically saying is kennedy is banished to the subs bench because he is a more talented player than blair. Yep, that makes sense bucks
 
Obviously Kennedy is the sub for a reason; just because you do not know that reason (or perhaps you know what the reason could possibly be and simply disagree with it) does not make the decision incorrect.

If BenKen gets an uninterrupted pre-season, he will not be the sub at all next year. Just be patient.
 
So what u basically saying is kennedy is banished to the subs bench because he is a more talented player than blair. Yep, that makes sense bucks
Nope not saying I agree with Kennedy as sub. I'm saying Blair shouldn't be sub. Personally, like many, I don't think he should have been selected. But now that he has, he shouldn't be sub because he isn't the sort of player who can have an impact or change a game even when he's in form. Based on the 22 selected I'd have preferred Young to be sub. Kennedy is in better form, but Young is the sort of player who can take advantage of coming on late and have an impact, especially with that penetrating kick he has.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Game Day AFL Round 18 - Collingwood vs Adelaide Matchday Discussion (MCG - 4.40pm)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top