To be fair to Saints fans, this is one player with problems and not a culture of misbehaviour as such.
Agreed.
Just given some of the incidents over recent years perhaps it would prudent to have witheld comment. That's all I'm saying.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
To be fair to Saints fans, this is one player with problems and not a culture of misbehaviour as such.
Fact is that Lovett has been a bad egg for sometime, with a list of misdemeanour's, but he was allowed to continue on down the same path for far too long.
If you are referring to the Milne/Montagna issue,. then yes. The club fully co-operated with the investigation, as they've done today.
And why shouldn't he?
not the most solid of sources is it. but innocent until proven guilty. dna tests will always be a good thing to use in these cases
Co-operating with the police is a legal requirement, its the least you'd expect.
They didnt indefinitely suspend those two but they did Lovett.
Why the different approach?
Are you suggesting that he never had an intervention order against him from his ex-girlfriend, never broke the said order, was never accused of assault, never caught driving without a licence, wasn't disciplined for missing curfews and training sessions?Care to explain?
So clear and precise with your comments. You must know a hell of a lot as to how Lovett was counselled and what attempts were made to reform his behaviour.
Elaborate.....
I for one am not putting on StKilda's culture. They've tried really hard to turn it around after letting players off lightly in the past.
But I certainly am questioning their recruiting. They stuffed up just about everything they could have stuffed up this year. Lovett brought with him the culture that they spent the last 5 years getting rid of. It was a recipe for disaster and the only surprise is how quickly it has all gone pear-shaped.
Just wondering, happened at the Storm too I believe, but...
Why the immediate 'indefinite suspension' if there has to be a belief in innocence until proven guilty? Why can't the Saints come out and say, 'look, Andrew says he is innocent, and the law states he is until proven otherwise, so he'll train as per usual'.
And if this was Grand Final week?I think it's a club image thing. If he was to continue training and then it came out he was guilty the club would be slammed left, right and center for allowing to to stay with the group.
If it turns out he is innocent they can simply say they were allowing him to handle the matter without the pressure of training and performing at the club. Due diligence is the 'in' thing in footy right now.
Is that a serious question? You're asking me how recruiting Lovett has gone pear-shaped?
This is an alleged assault. Lovett has not yet been charged, nor convicted. Can we please uphold the "innocent until proven guilty" line just for once.
And it would be nice if the Milne and Montagna incident was not brought out of the dustbin of history again. Despite what people might suspect, the two were never convicted of any offence and they have to be given the benefit of the doubt.
And if this was Grand Final week?
And if this was Grand Final week?