Anthony Albanese - How long? -2-

Remove this Banner Ad

Like everything in an inadequately-regulated capitalist society, the rich get richer while the poor and vulnerable suck it up.

I support capitalism and having a market economy, but I support much better regulation of markets. The housing crisis and examples like the above are why.

Yep. 100%.

These parasites are literally paying themselves massive bonuses off the back of selling grannies home.

If you ain't filthy, stinking rich in retirement or extremely lucky healthwise then you are looking at a very undignified final stage of life. What astounds me is that there isn't more noise around this given those who are lucky enough to not die young are going to be staring into the ramifications of old age at some point.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

you know if the coalition was in power they'd put together some sort of cash relief package that would help their mates more than the poors

but it would help the poors

because that is what they do, they use opportunities like this for political purposes, look at the start of the pandemic

ALP would support it to look good and we'd get something

but in opposition they will oppose anything presented because that is how they work

Of course Labor could still pass policy if they would work with the Greens

but they'd rather let policies fail and blame the Greens for it than the coalition because they are trying to keep the voters they are bleeding to the greens

note this isn't suggesting we'd be better if the coalition was in power, this is pointing out the problems they cause and how the ALP refuse to let the greens help them get around those problems
Reading your assessment, it just seems the ALP are spineless....stand up for what your values are.
 
Reading your assessment, it just seems the ALP are spineless....stand up for what your values are.
What values is Dutton standing up for?

Other than the value of getting power?

Isn't he still ahead in the polls?
Personally he still has a large lead on Dutton as preferred leader, its the the 2 party preferred vote that they are now even in
 
Thats actually pretty grave for Albo. Only a handful of points in front of Dutton.....thats pretty poor...
11 is a handful now?

Wow you math like Google doing their tax return
 
But still a head, yeah? And at the same margin as the election ended up at?

Lot of doomers out there
2PP is now 50 each in the lastest poll

primary vote for labor is going down, primary vote for coalition is going up

not equally, more more people dropping labor from first preference are moving to minor parties or independents than to the coalition

I didnt mean a numerical handful....

But either way....surely even a dullard with dead personality could slay dutton in the popularity polls....Albo is struggling.
sure you did

thats why you wrote it "Only a handful of points in front of Dutton"

you clearly meant it numerically

put them in a room with 100 people and 46 will vote for Albo as leader, 35 for Dutton and 19 wouldn't vote for either

Albo is clearly more popular personally than Dutton and that does matter more at an actual election, especially these days when everyone pretends its like a US presidential campaign
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

IIRC Dutton's budget reply


Thanks Todd but I wasn't talking to you and this doesn't answer my question

but it does explain some of your views thanks
 
Dutton is not the useless current government... It is that simple.

The same reason Albanese won the election, because he wasn't Scott Morrison. The primary vote at the last election showed that Albanese is the prime Minister no-one wanted.... Now that is coming home to roost in 2PP!

Don't get me started on his referendum he spent 6 months telling the public how we should vote while seemingly ignoring cost of living, only for the referendum to be called a loss in approximately 1 hour!

How can he be so bad?

Unlike Morrison he didn’t suspend parliament except for his pet project. I don’t see the comparisons
 
And what was your prediction before the last election?

I thought they were a ploy to split the vote away from the Coalition. You notice they only ran against the Coalition.

A bad copy and paste from Wiki.


2022 federal election[edit source]​

Further information: 2022 Australian federal election
Incumbents listed in italics did not re-contest their seats.

† denotes an incumbent MP


House of Representatives
CandidateStateDivisionIncumbent MPIncumbent party% 1st pref.% 2CPElected
Jo DyerSABoothbyNicolle FlintLiberal6.54%No
Nicolette BoeleNSWBradfieldPaul FletcherLiberal20.89%45.77%No
Kate HookNSWCalareAndrew GeeNational20.40%40.32%No
Claire Ferres MilesVicCaseyTony SmithLiberal8.34%No
Caz HeiseNSWCowperPat ConaghanNational26.26%47.68%No
Kate ChaneyWACurtinCelia HammondLiberal29.46%51.26%Yes
Despi O'ConnorVicFlindersGreg HuntLiberal7.24%No
Zoe DanielVicGoldsteinTim WilsonLiberal34.47%52.87%Yes
Liz HabermannSAGreyRowan RamseyLiberal11.26%No
Georgia SteeleNSWHughesCraig KellyUnited Australia14.33%No
Monique RyanVicKooyongJosh FrydenbergLiberal40.29%52.94%Yes
Sophie ScampsNSWMackellarJason FalinskiLiberal38.11%52.50%Yes
Kylea TinkNSWNorth SydneyTrent ZimmermanLiberal25.20%52.92%Yes
Hanabeth LukeNSWPageKevin HoganNational13.13%No
Alex DysonVicWannonDan TehanLiberal19.29%46.08%No
Zali SteggallNSWWarringahZali SteggallIndependent44.82%60.96%Yes
Allegra SpenderNSWWentworthDave SharmaLiberal35.77%54.20%Yes
 

I thought they were a ploy to split the vote away from the Coalition. You notice they only ran against the Coalition.

A bad copy and paste from Wiki.


2022 federal election[edit source]​

Further information: 2022 Australian federal election
Incumbents listed in italics did not re-contest their seats.

† denotes an incumbent MP


House of Representatives
CandidateStateDivisionIncumbent MPIncumbent party% 1st pref.% 2CPElected
Jo DyerSABoothbyNicolle FlintLiberal6.54%No
Nicolette BoeleNSWBradfieldPaul FletcherLiberal20.89%45.77%No
Kate HookNSWCalareAndrew GeeNational20.40%40.32%No
Claire Ferres MilesVicCaseyTony SmithLiberal8.34%No
Caz HeiseNSWCowperPat ConaghanNational26.26%47.68%No
Kate ChaneyWACurtinCelia HammondLiberal29.46%51.26%Yes
Despi O'ConnorVicFlindersGreg HuntLiberal7.24%No
Zoe DanielVicGoldsteinTim WilsonLiberal34.47%52.87%Yes
Liz HabermannSAGreyRowan RamseyLiberal11.26%No
Georgia SteeleNSWHughesCraig KellyUnited Australia14.33%No
Monique RyanVicKooyongJosh FrydenbergLiberal40.29%52.94%Yes
Sophie ScampsNSWMackellarJason FalinskiLiberal38.11%52.50%Yes
Kylea TinkNSWNorth SydneyTrent ZimmermanLiberal25.20%52.92%Yes
Hanabeth LukeNSWPageKevin HoganNational13.13%No
Alex DysonVicWannonDan TehanLiberal19.29%46.08%No
Zali SteggallNSWWarringahZali SteggallIndependent44.82%60.96%Yes
Allegra SpenderNSWWentworthDave SharmaLiberal35.77%54.20%Yes
Have you stopped to consider why a group of candidates, largely having climate change, gender equality and corruption as their main or significant platforms opposed incumbent Coalition (and 1 UAP) members instead of Labor? Something something attitude, policy and recent actions.

Also, the label "teal independent" is literally from the fact that they were challenging "blue" seats, many with centre-right economic positions, but with "greener" environmental/social positions, and for some, based on personal choices over branding (likely along similar lines as above for the early runners, publicity and association for latecomers). They were essentially running as moderate or nuanced Liberals in many cases (so not quite blue).

Why then would you refer to someone challenging Labor as "teal"? There were independents challenging incumbent Labor MPs, they just don't fit the label...
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Anthony Albanese - How long? -2-

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top