Anthony Albanese - How long? -2-

Remove this Banner Ad

LOL


Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed Attorney General Mark Dreyfus apologised to a Sky News reporter after lashing out during a press conference.

Ms Caisley had asked a media conference with three Labor ministers if they intended to offer an apology for a woman who was allegedly subject to abuse from one of the released detainees.

The question developed from a High Court decision which saw previously detained asylum seekers released into the Australian community based on indefinite detention being ruled unlawful.

Attorney General Mark Dreyfus took issue at the question, labelling it as “absurd” and began to point his finger at Ms Caisley, stating in a loud voice “I will not be apologising”.

Mr Albanese told Question Time on Thursday the Attorney General had engaged in a “courteous discussion” with Ms Caisley and “has apologised”.

“When our standards aren’t met in this place, we expect, that is the appropriate course of action to take,” Mr Albanese said.

No no, of course he didn’t do anything wrong..


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Paul Murray LOL. An overweight irrelevant conservative hack. Didn't hear boo when Scomo was was going around wrecking things because it was buttering his bread to support it all. Actually heard him say people needed to harden up at one point when cost of living was rising up a while back. Now he's moaning and whinging about the same issues. Has no credibility and should be ridiculed.
He's just a cheerleader for the Liberal Party like they all are on Sky
Nobody takes them seriously
 
LOL


Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed Attorney General Mark Dreyfus apologised to a Sky News reporter after lashing out during a press conference.

Ms Caisley had asked a media conference with three Labor ministers if they intended to offer an apology for a woman who was allegedly subject to abuse from one of the released detainees.

The question developed from a High Court decision which saw previously detained asylum seekers released into the Australian community based on indefinite detention being ruled unlawful.

Attorney General Mark Dreyfus took issue at the question, labelling it as “absurd” and began to point his finger at Ms Caisley, stating in a loud voice “I will not be apologising”.

Mr Albanese told Question Time on Thursday the Attorney General had engaged in a “courteous discussion” with Ms Caisley and “has apologised”.

“When our standards aren’t met in this place, we expect, that is the appropriate course of action to take,” Mr Albanese said.
Perhaps he should have said
"I reject the premise of your question"
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What's the bet Albanese s**t his pants at the thought of pissing off the mighty Murdoch and said 'Dreyfus, just swallow your pride and apologise.' I certainly wouldn't feel like apologising to a gutter hack journalist asking a stupid gotcha question.

"I'm sorry you asked a stupid question"
 
They’ve got until 2025 to bring them down. That was the promise.

After that, if still up, go nuts on him.
If they keep going up until then and he gets them down to the price now it's still a failure. That's the best he can hope for now too

Have you seen the power prices in Denmark and Germany? (The world leaders in renewable energy)
Then consider, we have a land mass 20x the size of Germany and only about 1/3 of their population - our infrastructure costs will noticeably more expensive.

Whether you agree with renewable energy or not, dont fall into this fairytale that the renewable transition is going to be cheap … our power prices will continue to rise over the next decade.
 
Have you seen the power prices in Denmark and Germany? (The world leaders in renewable energy)
Then consider, we have a land mass 20x the size of Germany and only about 1/3 of their population - our infrastructure costs will noticeably more expensive.

Whether you agree with renewable energy or not, dont fall into this fairytale that the renewable transition is going to be cheap … our power prices will continue to rise over the next decade.
Oh no, it definitely wont be cheap. We all knew that, we were still told energy prices were coming down by those making decisions and their cheerleaders...
 
Have you seen the power prices in Denmark and Germany? (The world leaders in renewable energy)
Then consider, we have a land mass 20x the size of Germany and only about 1/3 of their population - our infrastructure costs will noticeably more expensive.

Whether you agree with renewable energy or not, dont fall into this fairytale that the renewable transition is going to be cheap … our power prices will continue to rise over the next decade.

Absolutely it will.
And because of that we will never reign inflation in. This is something that the renewable zealots will never admit.
If it costs a producer more to produce and it costs a wholesaler more to transport, then of course prices will go up. It’s basic economics

Albanese was an idiot for promising lower power prices and setting these ludicrous renewable targets.

Both are unachievable.
 
Absolutely it will.
And because of that we will never reign inflation in. This is something that the renewable zealots will never admit.
If it costs a producer more to produce and it costs a wholesaler more to transport, then of course prices will go up. It’s basic economics

Albanese was an idiot for promising lower power prices and setting these ludicrous renewable targets.

Both are unachievable.

As more and more households go solar, for sure the rest of us will pay more and more to prop up outdated power companies.

Or are you suggesting solar owners household power costs more after going solar?
 
What's the bet Albanese s**t his pants at the thought of pissing off the mighty Murdoch and said 'Dreyfus, just swallow your pride and apologise.' I certainly wouldn't feel like apologising to a gutter hack journalist asking a stupid gotcha question.

So outside of being sky what makes you state she is a gutter hack journalist?

Cant wait for the outcry the next time an abc opinion wri,sorry journalist gets abused


Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
 
It wasn’t a question directed at him nor answered by him. And his response was not to answer but attack the female journalist. Every press conference journos ask repeat questions especially if the poli adds extra info. he chose not answer the question posed. The question was not about the high court decision but the government’s response. Dreyfus reveals the depth of incompetence and irritation he feels at the situation they’ve got us into.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She doesn’t get favours for being a girl. No special treatment.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nothing makes people barrack for their teams more than a journo v politician confrontation at a press conference.
I’m not sure she is a real professional journalist, just another ****ing opinion troller muck raker for clickbait which is what media has reduced itself to now.
 
Anyone see the real problem in the story?
----------------------------------------------------

Guardian Australia revealed in October that NZYQ arrived by boat in September 2012 but had his bridging visa cancelled in January 2015 when he was charged with raping a 10-year-old in Australia. In January 2016 he pleaded guilty to one count of sexual intercourse with a person aged between 10 and 14 years in breach of the New South Wales Crimes Act.

He served a non-parole period of three years and four months, was released from prison and sent into immigration detention in May 2018, but was denied a safe-haven enterprise visa.
The 3 years and 4 month non parole period?
 
So you’re more interested in who asked the question rather than it being a legitimate question that deserved an answer let alone some sort civility from an elected official.
Asking to ignore the high court is not a legitimate question
 
More a case of how he would leave our shores. Some other country has to accept him. Long gone are the days when RFK as US AG kidnapped Carlos Marcello and put him on a plane to Guatemala, a place he'd never been to.

There is another case of one of the people in question who is facing the death penalty in his country of origin if deported. This also causes a problem for Australia and we haven't covered ourselves in glory in this area (see Bali Nine). Australia clearly shouldn't be a country that sends people back to places where we know they will get killed. But the way forward is more complicated than that, and most people avoid talking about one side of the issue depending on where they sit politically.
Meh I have more equipoise about that, not my/ our countries job to dictate justice standards to the rest of the world for acts which are agreed to be crimes (different if facing death sentence for political writings for example)
 
Have you seen the power prices in Denmark and Germany? (The world leaders in renewable energy)
Then consider, we have a land mass 20x the size of Germany and only about 1/3 of their population - our infrastructure costs will noticeably more expensive.

Whether you agree with renewable energy or not, dont fall into this fairytale that the renewable transition is going to be cheap … our power prices will continue to rise over the next decade.

By what metric do you claim that Denmark and Germany are "[T]he world leaders in renewable energy"? When I look up overall renewable source capacity, China, the US, and Brazil are the leaders (Germany is 5th); and when I look up renewable sources as a proportion of energy capacity, it's Norway and Brazil on top (Germany is 9th). Additionally, when I looked up a global comparison of energy prices, all of these countries have cheaper electricity that Australia.

This is not to say that transitioning to renewables in Australia is going to be cheap… but I don't think using Denmark and Germany as examples is helpful to your case.
 
N
It was a legitimate question as the three stooges on the stages were the ones responsible for the release of these people.

The Ag interjected and then started by angrily carrying about the question then when the journalist tried to repeat or raise a point lost his mind.

Now this A-g has many fails on his resume and this just ads to it
no the high court was responsible for not giving reasons and also Dutton for drafting useless legislation because he has the intelligence of a cardboard box
 
And yes evil sky news reporters again. I wonder what sort of abuse sky news reporters are allowed to be subjected to before the alp stooges think yeah it’s probably wrong behaviour


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Public flogging would be too far.
 
N
Don't bother debating with Goroyals. Bloke is either a deluded troll or has no morals or ethics and thinks governments should do what they like regardless of whether it's legal or not. Clearly brainwashed from the decade we just had where that's exactly what happened.
no he is just partisan. Will excuse behaviour of his side.
 
The Australian Human Rights Commission tried twice to bring this case up during the Morrison government. Both times they were rejected.

They tried again when Labor got in and Mr Scotch College (aka the smartest man in the room aka Mark Dreyfuss) of course allowed them to try the case.

To say Labor are not responsible is riidiculous.

To add even more fuel to the fire, the case was about one person but Clare O’Neill decided to let them all out once the High Court made their decision. I assume My Scotch College was responsible for that advice as well.

They could have easily allowed the person concerned to leave detention and then spun up legislation to keep the others detained but once again Labor not across the detail.

They know this and are desperately trying to shift the blame. Meanwhile Albanese has gone MIA again as his want when hard details are required.

Has there been a PM before more superficial than Albanese?
He makes Trudeau look like a Professor.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Anthony Albanese - How long? -2-

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top