Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Just wanting to put this one to bed.. there's talk, we're not actually considering Gary Rohan are we?

ITK's can you verify this info???


That has come from an attention seeking F/Book fan page! :rolleyes:


RUM.jpg
 
Everyone does
that is true stephen colbert GIF by Obama
 
Are we so quick to look for a Jack Martin replacement? Gary Rohan is as reliable as Jack Martin getting on the park.

Well, he's played more games the last 3 years (39 v 28) but still - this included 10 games as sub or subbed off versus 7 for Jack Martin. So non-subbed games is closer at 29 (GR) v 21 (JM). Plus Gary has 4 years on Jack.

I'm good, thanks.
 
Gary Rohan is worse than some of the players we delisted. I mean Matthew Owies this year had a better season than any season of Rohan’s career. **** no.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What about James Van Es as that defensive piece. Been held back by an ankle injury, but the screws have been removed and he’s had a season of rehab. Good size, only 20 and was rated in his draft year.
Screws removed, rehab … very triggering !
o_O
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top