'
At Collingwood Cox is a forward or hes nothing.
Its of no benefit to us to use him as a ruckman because hitouts alone are not enough when we already have Grundy in the side to do that. He needs to hit the scorebaoard and to do that needs to clunk marks. If he doenst do that then we go to more mobile option.
Cox is only a ruckman as well, l wouldnt be depending in Cox to be that goal kicking key forward. Thats not to degrade Cox in anyway, but he has trouble holding marks, unsure where to lead to or when and other club defences work off his defencies which are a few to their advantage. To me Cox would be better as a tap ruckman 100% of the time, where he looks alot more comfortable.
At Collingwood Cox is a forward or hes nothing.
Its of no benefit to us to use him as a ruckman because hitouts alone are not enough when we already have Grundy in the side to do that. He needs to hit the scorebaoard and to do that needs to clunk marks. If he doenst do that then we go to more mobile option.