Why would you take Langdon out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Goldstein cops a fine, will play:
Why would you take Langdon out?
Beat me to it, Kirb!Golstein should have been given $1000 for striking Ballantyne.
Poor? He had 23 possessions again. Not bad for a poor player.Has been poor over the last couple of weeks.
Fair enough.North are currently $1.66 favourites.
Don't agree with you often but I think a few errors have given people a negative short term outlook on Langdon. In my opinion it's a bit unfair. He was solid for the most part. Set up a number of forays forward.Poor? He had 23 possessions again. Not bad for a poor player.
Is it just me, or was there a lot of mixed messages in that update? Balme saying Moore and Greenwood will be back in two weeks and short term, but then the indicator and injury list saying medium term...Balme's injury update;
http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/video/2015-05-25/blackmores-injury-update-round-nine
Toovey and Frost should play, woo hoo.
Ramsay still a week away. Young and Reid to play VFL.
Is it just me, or was there a lot of mixed messages in that update? Balme saying Moore and Greenwood will be back in two weeks and short term, but then the indicator and injury list saying medium term...
Thanks for that dear. I wasn't aware that posting about injured players was forbidden in this thread.Thread is about changes v North. Moore and Greenwood arent relevant to that. As long as Frost and Toovey are available thats all that really matters for this weeks game (Ramsay woudl have been good tooo but at least Tooves is available) .
Personally I dont get too hung up on reading between the lines re the longer term injured. They'll be ready when they are ready. Hopefully Reid plays VFL this week.
Is it just me, or was there a lot of mixed messages in that update? Balme saying Moore and Greenwood will be back in two weeks and short term, but then the indicator and injury list saying medium term...
Thanks for that dear. I wasn't aware that posting about injured players was forbidden in this thread.
Yeah that stupid dial at the bottom didn't match what he said.....Is it just me, or was there a lot of mixed messages in that update? Balme saying Moore and Greenwood will be back in two weeks and short term, but then the indicator and injury list saying medium term...
Yeah that stupid dial at the bottom didn't match what he said.....
Still, it was very positive and he said basically that Moore and Greenwood would play the week after this one.
Kennedy is good to go for this week and was confirmed to have had minor tightness in the hammy which is now good. Nice work/info again Scodog10
I feel as though when Balmey says "Probably not this week but the week after" is the new 2-3 weeks from last year.
Those players in that category will never come back
Is it just me, or was there a lot of mixed messages in that update? Balme saying Moore and Greenwood will be back in two weeks and short term, but then the indicator and injury list saying medium term...
I think it's a deliberate ploy to have a bit each way and create confusion to take some pressure off the medical and fitness staff.
Did anyone see Ramsay get injured?
I swear it was stated he was only going to miss a week originally now he's still unavailable.
It must be some shin injury.
Someone on here said a while back (from their personal experience) that shin corkies weren't like other corkies and could take a long time to recover.