- Mar 26, 2007
- 21,223
- 45,863
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Anaheim Ducks, White Sox
It may not be a great structure but importantly it is the best we have at the moment. No point crying over our defensive structure because Jonas, Hombsch and O'Shea is our best set up back there. Clurey is not ready and will not give us what O'Shea does.Nah, don't agree whatsoever.
Firstly, our tall defenders conceded 3 goals against a team with no notable big forwards on a slippery night where the teams managed 15 goals between them - it's hardly a huge win.
Secondly, the loss of Trengove has effects all over the ground. It means Westhoff spends time in ruck, robbing our forward line of one of its two talls. It means Trengove is no longer in the back line, replaced by O'Shea who is a good player but a totally different, less physical player. And it weakens our ruck division in general because our new back up, 25% ruckman in Westhoff just isn't any bloody good and simply goes there to give Lobbe a rest.
It's just awful structure. Period.
The only question in our selections was do we bring in Butcher. However as Hinkley has said, he isn't performing well enough and quite frankly at a time when our goalkicking is hurting us I'm pretty sure Butchers poor kicking is keeping him out.
I see no real surprises with our selections, we're trying to pick the best available 22 and we've done it. We certainly are missing Trengove but not much can be done without a replacement for him. Right now we are also missing Colquhoun to take the spot of a Mitchell and probably even Redden who would help fill the Trengove hole. Hell it also would've been nice to be bringing in quality like P Stewart and Moore instead of S Gray and Newton, also would've even be nice to had the choice of bringing in Heath to that small defender spot. However we don't have those options at the moment so we have to do the best with what we have.
For mine I'd play Butch, but I can understand why we don't.
Last edited: