Some are saying he’s not playing because he is leaving / shouldn’t play for that reasonOn Busslinger, he is very close to selection. He moved into the rehab group today to monitor his loads, the club are being cautious not to overwork him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some are saying he’s not playing because he is leaving / shouldn’t play for that reasonOn Busslinger, he is very close to selection. He moved into the rehab group today to monitor his loads, the club are being cautious not to overwork him.
I haven't read that but it is deffinetly not the case. He will be playing VFL on the weekend. I expect he forces his way into the team before the bye.Some are saying he’s not playing because he is leaving / shouldn’t play for that reason
Bailey Smith’s direct opponent Iaasc Quaynor got 9 votes in the Collingwood match last year.Vandermeer’s opponent got nine coaches votes but it’s good to see him persisted with again, the way he uses his speed to run down players from behind is crucial and his ability to be composed under pressure is certainly not an issue.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not necessarily, but all those guys have actually had good games before. Especially Kharmis and JUH, but VDM hasn’t had a good game since 2020. He is consistent, that is for sure. It was a week for 5 changes, not just 4. Even Taylor Dureay was lucky to survive, but he has so many credits in the bank, VDM has none, more likely a debt.Do you both think he was worse last week than Khamis, Clarke, Ugle-Hagan, Gallagher and O'Donnell? I think he was better than all - which is obviously a terrible sign. He didn't play well, but I'm not surprised to see him stay in given the other changes. Especially with the most likely VFL replacements seemingly not putting their best foot forward.
"Some" meaning the 2+2=5 speculators?Some are saying he’s not playing because he is leaving / shouldn’t play for that reason
Even if we knew he was leaving there would be no logical reason not to play him."Some" meaning the 2+2=5 speculators?
Or is this some actual intel from within MWO?
I hope and expect MC will play it straight. Give him every opportunity by selecting him when he's ready.
The best way to keep him - if he's really weighing up his career options - is to reaffirm our belief in him and to stick to established and fair principles of team selection and player development.
That's fair - who, then, would you have brought in? Genuine question. I haven't watched the VFL, but from what I have seen, all of the high half forwards that could theoretically take Vandermeer's spot/role have been below par.Not necessarily, but all those guys have actually had good games before. Especially Kharmis and JUH, but VDM hasn’t had a good game since 2020. He is consistent, that is for sure. It was a week for 5 changes, not just 4. Even Taylor Dureay was lucky to survive, but he has so many credits in the bank, VDM has none, more likely a debt.
I take your overall point. But I'm pretty sure VDM had a game where people gave him Ching votes this year. Maybe in Rd 2 or 3?Not necessarily, but all those guys have actually had good games before. Especially Kharmis and JUH, but VDM hasn’t had a good game since 2020. He is consistent, that is for sure. It was a week for 5 changes, not just 4. Even Taylor Dureay was lucky to survive, but he has so many credits in the bank, VDM has none, more likely a debt.
I take your overall point. But I'm pretty sure VDM had a game where people gave him Ching votes this year. Maybe in Rd 2 or 3?
He's a slow burn VDM. Y'all come around eventually.I take your overall point. But I'm pretty sure VDM had a game where people gave him Ching votes this year. Maybe in Rd 2 or 3?
He is becoming a really good small forward in the Toby Greene mould
On SM-S926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Keath struggles with the pace of AFL vs VFL in my opinion
Hope I’m wrong but his turning circle is a real issue, ball in hand he is nervous and when he makes a decision the opposition telegraph it and he is slow to cover the ground
Good to see a little bit of mongrel in one of our playersThe 1 week out kinda supports that contention
I regularly watch players off the ball at games, he runs around aimlessly most of the time which is why he’s involved so little. I think a pressure forward has been a glaring hole on the list for years, if a forward was rushing the opposition consistently and laying tackles I’d play them right now if they were going stat less.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not necessarily, but all those guys have actually had good games before. Especially Kharmis and JUH, but VDM hasn’t had a good game since 2020. He is consistent, that is for sure. It was a week for 5 changes, not just 4. Even Taylor Dureay was lucky to survive, but he has so many credits in the bank, VDM has none, more likely a debt.
LVM is the luckiest footballer in the AFL.....
I still don't think he will ever be a genuine lock best 22, far from it, but really has not been in our worst 5 players in any of the last 5 games so he is not getting dropped yetTo be fair he kicked two important goals, and looked solid. He’s slowly improving every week. I’ve been a critic of his but at this stage he was more promising than Clarke.
West comes in for Vandermeer. Probably Bendendo. Maybe then Sanders, who hasn’t really had a good run at it yet, but seems to offer more than him too.That's fair - who, then, would you have brought in? Genuine question. I haven't watched the VFL, but from what I have seen, all of the high half forwards that could theoretically take Vandermeer's spot/role have been below par.
I don’t rate VDM in the slightest and find the sprints stat ridiculous given almost every week he is bottom 10 for pressure acts, tackles and possessions. This suggests any running he is doing is not applying any pressure and is not getting in a position to get the ball.
This ignores the importance of closing down space. We are at times horrendous at letting teams make quick breaks with dangerous space left open. For any of his failings Vanders is one of our best at closing down that space, which in turn forces teams to kick to a less dangerous position or to slow down their movement. Vanders doesn't get any stats for that (other than repeat sprints!).
Continued selection is probably the only stat that indicates it's valued. You'd have to know the value and place of all the pieces in the puzzle to know the answer. We're all guessing.I don’t agree he does that in the games I have watched, admittedly most are on tv. But outside of JUH, he seems to be the first to give up on defensive transition, when it comes to defence it’s rare he uses his speed to my eye.
Not sure there is a stat out there that tells you whether his running is achieving anything