Apex36
Hall of Famer
- Mar 26, 2014
- 40,241
- 85,640
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
He can, but the Eagles would have to pull the contract they have on offer for him. He can't be picked up a DFA if he delists himself.he can still be delisted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He can, but the Eagles would have to pull the contract they have on offer for him. He can't be picked up a DFA if he delists himself.he can still be delisted
so does any one know whats allens and hines plan is, or is it just watch this space.
Deal would have been done already if we were accepting pick 70.To be honest the clubs done well. Mitchell is only got pick 88
which they can do if things change for themHe can, but the Eagles would have to pull the contract they have on offer for him. He can't be picked up a DFA if he delists himself.
Yep, but we're moving well in to the realm of 'what if's' now. As it stands Mitch is not eligible for delisted free agency.which they can do if things change for them
Hawks are doing a good job of eclipsing us in a matter of weeks.Surely the last 5 years have to be the biggest dismantling of a football club that's ever been seen right?
White may play more footy in defensePossibly foxing so as not to telegraph trade moves, or maybe the game trend is away from very tall key forwards. Hawthorn didn't have a great deal this year, nor Dogs.
Goldy is 193, then Keeffe at 200, Reid at 196 and Howe at whatever he is. Feels like we'd want one more.
Surely the last 5 years have to be the biggest dismantling of a football club that's ever been seen right?
Hawks are doing a good job of eclipsing us in a matter of weeks.
which i am happy about because we do not want Mitch. Better playing a mid sized cover defense with run and reasonable ball use. No point banging our heads on the same wall due to our key defenders being allowed to receive the ball deep (opposition zones off) only to turn it over on the way out. I can sleep happy knowing that neither Nathan or Jack are using the football in our D50 to search for a rainbow.Yep, but we're moving well in to the realm of 'what if's' now. As it stands Mitch is not eligible for delisted free agency.
It's a joke mate, where does an italian put a suppository? in-you-end-o, get it?lol no I did not.
Did you know that sick in Turkish means f&?ck and umm means C&&nt.
So when people are thinking in Turkey the make the sound ahhhh not ummmm.
I know what you were saying.I"m talking the last 5 seasons. Not last 5 days. Hawthorn's turnover since 2010 doesn't really come close to matching ours does it?
Surely the last 5 years have to be the biggest dismantling of a football club that's ever been seen right?
Yeah I think if we wanted Mitch we'd have already taken him by now. I'd be surprised if he ended up at our club as a DFA if he ended up in that situation. Probably go to North I reckon.which i am happy about because we do not want Mitch. Better playing a mid sized cover defense with run and reasonable ball use. No point banging our heads on the same wall due to our key defenders being allowed to receive the ball deep (opposition zones off) only to turn it over on the way out. I can sleep happy knowing that neither Nathan or Jack are using the football in our D50 to search for a rainbow.
Dont eat the yellow snow is a Zappa song
I"m talking the last 5 seasons. Not last 5 days. Hawthorn's turnover since 2010 doesn't really come close to matching ours does it?
THIS. SO MUCH THIS.Greenwood for Trengove
Get it done.
THIS. SO MUCH THIS.
THIS. SO MUCH THIS.