List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

[Keys]

Quick links

• Player contract status
• Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)
• AFL retirements and delistings
• Provisional 2025 Draft order

---

Trade period
In: 12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

• Jai Culley, Alex Witherden
  23

  Alex Witherden

  Age

  26

  Ht

  188cm

  Wt

  85kg

  Pos.

  Def

  Career

  Season

  Last 5

  D

  20.7

  5star

  K

  15.2

  5star

  HB

  5.5

  4star

  M

  6.2

  5star

  T

  1.8

  4star

  MG

  386.5

  5star

  D

  13.0

  3star

  K

  10.0

  4star

  HB

  3.0

  2star

  M

  7.0

  5star

  T

  0.0

  1star

  MG

  201.0

  3star

  D

  24.0

  5star

  K

  15.4

  5star

  HB

  8.6

  5star

  M

  5.8

  5star

  T

  2.2

  4star

  MG

  380.2

  5star

  and Coby Burgiel delisted
  • Burgiel to be considered as a train on player

• Tom Barrass traded to Hawthorn
  • In: F1, F2, F3 (HAW)
  • Out: Barrass, F4

• Liam Baker and Matt Owies join West Coast in Pick 3 trade
  • In: Baker, Owies, 12, 73
  • Out: 3, 63, 68

• Jack Darling traded to North Melbourne for Pick 67

• Jack Graham joins West Coast as UFA

• Jake Waterman re-signs with West Coast until at least 2029

• Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones
  31

  Jamaine Jones

  Age

  26

  Ht

  180cm

  Wt

  80kg

  Pos.

  D/F

  Career

  Season

  Last 5

  D

  9.0

  2star

  K

  4.8

  2star

  HB

  4.2

  3star

  M

  2.1

  2star

  T

  3.8

  5star

  MG

  159.6

  3star

  D

  10.5

  3star

  K

  6.5

  3star

  HB

  4.0

  3star

  M

  2.5

  3star

  T

  4.0

  5star

  MG

  196.5

  3star

  D

  9.0

  3star

  K

  4.2

  2star

  HB

  4.8

  4star

  M

  2.4

  3star

  T

  4.2

  5star

  MG

  166.0

  3star

  and Jordyn Baker delisted

• Archer Reid (2027), Loch Rawlinson (2025), and Coen Livingstone (2025) sign extensions

 

[Obeanie1]

Do you not realise there are other picks to find half back flankers? No one is saying that we should choose mids with all our picks. Just choose a mid with the first pick in a draft that has really strong mids in it.

Sometimes I think people just want to go against the grain. You come across like a flat earther. Are you a sovereign citizen by any chance?

Lol.

Fair indication someone is struggling with any debate. Start using derogatory statements putting your opposition down.

I'm am as far away from a flat earther you can imagine.

Do yourself a favour and stick to the debate and don't play the man.

 

[Yeahnahmate]

We have a fair few mids to sort through and develop. We will add another one or two.

You cant just keep drafting mids and only mids until you get a gun midfield. If you did you would habe no forwards and no defenders.

And the talls at your second rounder may be rated much higher than the mids available at that pick.

So blindly drafting mids for the sake of it isnt a great strategy.

Agree you can’t just take mids but we’re far from stacked and haven’t had a large cache of early picks the last couple drafts despite our finishing positions.

Before the draft is compromised further and looking at what we have we are still deficient in the middle and need at least a couple more quality pieces to build around

 

[eaglevision]

Edited:

Barrass, Petch, 26, F2 for 12, 14 and Carroll.

Add Owies at no cost or DFA.

 

[Ruben Grubarb]

Lol.

Fair indication someone is struggling with any debate. Start using derogatory statements putting your opposition down.

I'm am as far away from a flat farther you can imagine.

Do yourself a favour and stick to the debate and don't play the man.

So why do you ignore that we can get flankers with picks outside the first round? And all the major phantom drafts, why do none of them have flankers in the top10? You're being different for the sake of being different. Sort of what fearthers do. It's why I asked the question.

 

[Big_Birdy]

Barrass, Petch, F2 for 14, F1 and Carroll.

Add Owies at no cost or DFA.

Carlton already traded their F1 to Hawks

 

[squashface]

Barrass, Petch, F2 for 14, F1 and Carroll.

Add Owies at no cost or DFA.

Truly big brain areas for Kane.

Carlton offering us the same pick we refused from Hawthorn to try and steal him

 

[SumaGodCoach]

Barrass, Petch, F2 for 14, F1 and Carroll.

Add Owies at no cost or DFA.

Carlton doesn't have a future first, unless they trade Darling for one.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

One is for free. Graham is 27. We lack players in this age group. Baker is 26. Hard as nails, always puts in effort. I wouldn't pay more than 26 for him, but he will be good for us. Pick up Smith/Draper/FOS, and along with Harley Reid, Baker would just be shoring stuff up and making it easier for them. We want to rebuild with talent, but if you have no older guys who put their body over the ball, you're in trouble.


Says who? The media? Some nuffies on here?


Also nuffies on here, who every year only want WA players. And want to cough up F1's for said WA player. They get all emotional, just like you.


You don't seem to be able to separate media and forum talk with actual actions.


Bro, it's you who is having a tanty.

Bolded is crao. Look at our 21-25 list profile. This is whats missing. The idea we need more guys with 5 years left in their careers is crap

Literally Matt Clarke said he will look at it...

Literally did try to get Curtin with our F1st. We admitted so in the press

Its you who isnt reading what the clubs actually said and assume its all media talk

Im having a tantrum at the club, not some random dude on a internet forum. A big difference between the two

 

[stallon]

Nvm about the Barrass to Carlton dream, back to looking at the Hawks picks

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Nvm about the Barrass to Carlton dream, back to looking at the Hawks picks

Its either Hawks or he stays. At this point just keep him

Barrass and club need to put some big boy pants on and come to a resolution

 

[mat11]

Edited:

Barrass, Petch, 26, F2 for 12, 14 and Carroll.

Add Owies at no cost or DFA.

Barass + F2/F3 for 12 + 14 get it done

Don't hate the Petrucelle/carrol swap but owies is a bit gross

On SM-A155F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[bUCKET__]

Anyone else reckon that the season is on the line this week if we don't get Parish and Owies over

 

[Cuzz09]

Personally wouldn't mind Owies.

Little goal sneak would be good

Sent from my SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[ozymandias___]

Reckon Hough and Ginbey is a good start in the elite backmen stakes.

Reubs looks like a natural general back there to me.

Ginbey needs to spend 3 offseasons watching Luke Hodge highlights, would love him in that mould

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Anyone else reckon that the season is on the line this week if we don't get Parish and Owies over

Nope. Ive been reliably told by many posters its Liam Baker or bust

Liam Baker and we are flag contenders and without him we win the spoon

 

[pantskyle]

I hope Dees are ultimately making a play for pick 3.

 

[eaglevision]

Interesting.

Presume it’s our future picks we’d get from Barrass but if we can consider f***ing Baker off and trading our F1 and Barrass capital for 6,13,29 then we could go to the draft with 3,6,13,26,29,62,67 and leave GCS with 4 x 1Rs next year.

 

[new breed]

Ginbey is an original player , own style looks promising the way he finished the season .

 

[stavro#4]

 

[stallon]

No mention of you guys I notice, guess the Saints may not be involved as was suggested yesterday

 

[stavro#4]

No mention of you guys I notice, guess the Saints may not be involved as was suggested yesterday

Which is interesting because an hour ago Sam Edmund was talking about our offer

 

[dajesmac]

I hope Dees are ultimately making a play for pick 3.

I was thinking the same thing. After their weird trade of 14, 27 and 35 for 11 last year I was hoping he could exploit them.

North seems like a stronger chance to make that happen perhaps, holding 2 and with their own desire to pick split

 

[Obeanie1]

So why do you ignore that we can get flankers with picks outside the first round? And all the major phantom drafts, why do none of them have flankers in the top10? You're being different for the sake of being different. Sort of what fearthers do. It's why I asked the question.

What pick did Lockie Whitfield go?

Luke Hodge?

I see Travagalia as that exact type of player.

And he will only cost a pick around 7 to 10.

My perfect draft is we get Travalgalia AND a Lindsay or if we do land another top 10 pick a sliding mid like Langford or Smillie. Lindsay at 10/11 would be just as good.

This draft is very hard to judge. The best mid may well just get taken after pick 10.

You call this being different for the sake of it. Well just focusing on using our lowest pick on a mid is simplistic without understanding the depth of this draft. And disregarding what the modern game has become or what our list needs are.

 

[stallon]

Which is interesting because an hour ago Sam Edmund was talking about our offer

I think he was just referring to yesterdays news. Twomey must have new news, either that or he just forgot to mention you guys

 

[stavro#4]

I think he was just referring to yesterdays news. Twomey must have new news, either that or he just forgot to mention you guys

We will soon find out I guess. Your reporter was referring to the baker deal.