List Mgmt. Contract, Trade & Draftee Discussion - 2022 Off Season Edition

[Keys]

Contract status of all players now fully updated

The Contracts Thread

2024 List Changes : Retired- Gaff Delisted - Jones, Trew, Baker Requested Trades - Barrass, Darling Current contract status (Updated 18/9/24) : Total 41 Players (Pending Trades) - Main List (35) Rookie List (4) Cat B (2) Contracted to 2028 (2) : Liam Duggan (11/12/96) - Signed a 4 year...

www.bigfooty.com

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

Yeah I mean it's probably the fairest I've seen but why are we doing it?

If there’s no-one we particularly rate at 2, there’s a few players we’d be keen on at 8, and we’re keen to improve our draft position next year.

We’d have 8, 20 and 26 this year and two first rounders and two (probably high) second rounders next year.

 

[kranky al]

Eagles lose: pick 2, Rioli, future third
Eagles gain: pick 8, future first (Port), future second (North)

Port lose: pick 8, future first, Bergman
Port gain: JHF, Rioli

North lose: JHF, future 2nd
North gain: pick 2, Bergman, future third (WCE)

Who says no?

Reckon that works out to getting 8, 12 and 20 give or take.

 

[pantskyle]

Eagles lose: pick 2, Rioli, future third
Eagles gain: pick 8, future first (Port), future second (North)

Port lose: pick 8, future first, Bergman
Port gain: JHF, Rioli

North lose: JHF, future 2nd
North gain: pick 2, Bergman, future third (WCE)

Who says no?

Throw in we make a side deal with North that they don't take Jackson in the PSD.

Who says no?

 

[TerryFilk]

Basically we're doing everyone else a favour and breaking even.

My train of thought here is if we’re trading pick 2 we should walk away from the deal feeling like we’ve just won it big time.

I honestly think on draft night we could just slide back a couple times and net a better offer than what Port are essentially offering

 

[Spooky17]

Yeah I mean it's probably the fairest I've seen but why are we doing it?

I agree, it is a fair trade and good attempt by Miguel. That said, we should only get involved in this trade if we improve on what we started with. We are under no obligation to participate unless it benefits us.

 

[MrWoollie]

Im not sure port knows how trading works

Looking at their board, their supporters certainly don't.

 

[Eastern Rangers]

There are multiple teams attempting too much.

Port wants JHF, Jnr & Ratugolea and doesn't have the currency.

Richmond wants Taranto and Hopper, at least they're looking to move players on.

Geelong wants Henry, Bruhn & Bowes/ pick 7. They obviously don't want to part with pick 7 and haven't got the currency.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

 

[southcoast]

Basically we're doing everyone else a favour and breaking even.

I think I prefer keep 2 and do the ‘double slide back’ someone else suggested and build our early second round picks.

Particularly if we aren’t particular wedded to the ‘higher touted picks’


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Ambrose Burnside]

If there’s no-one we particularly rate at 2, there’s a few players we’d be keen on at 8, and we’re keen to improve our draft position next year.

We’d have 8, 20 and 26 this year and two first rounders and two (probably high) second rounders next year.

I tend to think we'd get a better deal on draft night.

 

[BeeTee]

I like the calls on holding Pick 2 until draft night and see what offers present. Otherwise take the best available mid.

 

[WCEswift]

The only way i can see us port and north shaking out is if gws and cats get involved too, we end with something like 8 12 and a future 3rd for 2, rioli and a 38

 

[Keys]

WCE
Give : Pick 2, Rioli
Get : Pick 8, Port F1, North F2

North
Give : JHF, F2
Get : Pick 2, 33, Player

Port
Give : Pick 8,33, F1, Player
Get : JHF, Rioli

Works well enough for us

With picks 1 AND 2, North can broker a sweet deal to split one of those picks

Port and North can fight amongst themselves for which player balances it out as it’s not our concern

Leaves Port with 43 and 53 to give to Geelong for Ratugolea

 

[ThePuma #9]

Giant interest in Pick 1 revealed as North great warns club ‘can’t make that mistake’

Giant interest in Pick 1 revealed as North great warns club ‘can’t make that mistake’

www.foxsports.com.au

Well then, I think we will keep pick 2 till draft night.

If North trade pick 1 to GWS we have Wardlaw and Sheezel to pick or listen to offers.

If North take Cadman…ditto

If North take Sheezel we can do a trade with GWS for Cadman

If North take Wardlaw….we can take best offer for Cadman or Sheezel….


Win win win win

 

[pantskyle]

WCE
Give : Pick 2, Rioli
Get : Pick 8, Port F1, North F2

North
Give : JHF, F2
Get : Pick 2, 33, Player

Port
Give : Pick 8,33, F1, Player
Get : JHF, Rioli

Works well enough for us

With picks 1 AND 2, North can broker a sweet deal to split one of those picks

Port and North can fight amongst themselves for which player balances it out as it’s not our concern

Leaves Port with 43 and 53 to give to Geelong for Ratugolea

Who says no?

 

[pantskyle]

Giant interest in Pick 1 revealed as North great warns club ‘can’t make that mistake’

Giant interest in Pick 1 revealed as North great warns club ‘can’t make that mistake’

www.foxsports.com.au

Well then, I think we will keep pick 2 till draft night.

If North trade pick 1 to GWS we have Wardlaw and Sheezel to pick or listen to offers.

If North take Cadman…ditto

If North take Sheezel we can do a trade with GWS for Cadman

If North take Wardlaw….we can take best offer for Cadman or Sheezel….


Win win win win

Not sure North will take Cadman so GWS should be checking with the Eagles.

 

[ziad]

I like the calls on holding Pick 2 until draft night and see what offers present. Otherwise take the best available mid.

Agree. I dont like the idea of us getting a 'fair deal'. We ae in a strong position and what to reinforce it (unfairly if you like)

 

[ThePuma #9]

Not sure North will take Cadman so GWS should be checking with the Eagles.

I agree but it’s all the more reason we wait till draft night. GWS being desperate for Cadman gives us a lot of different options.

 

[CountryLad]

If there’s no-one we particularly rate at 2, there’s a few players we’d be keen on at 8, and we’re keen to improve our draft position next year.

We’d have 8, 20 and 26 this year and two first rounders and two (probably high) second rounders next year.

I know we all go around circles here with these discussions.

But I can’t help but wonder if we have all written Warlaw off too early.

If he gets to pick 3 and the club has had a good interview with him and he’s tested well at the combine we would be mad to not take the risk on him.

The kid is the best player in the draft when he’s on the park. Better than Ashcroft.

Has a little bit of Judd about this story I know Judd was shoulders and Warlaw Hammies but still.

Imagine trading pick 2 out and he goes on to be the A grader from this draft.

 

[Obeanie1]

We should do a Port.

Trade 2 and a future 2nd to GWS for 3 and 12.

Just forget about them and move on.

Fair chance if North get pick 1 and 2 one of them will be Cadman. Who I see as GWS main target.

 

[larrikin]

It seems the logic is we have to trade pick 2 to get something for Rioli.

Yeah, **** off.

 

[Chad in Vegas]

There are multiple teams attempting too much.

Port wants JHF, Jnr & Ratugolea and doesn't have the currency.

Richmond wants Taranto and Hopper, at least they're looking to move players on.

Geelong wants Henry, Bruhn & Bowes/ pick 7. They obviously don't want to part with pick 7 and haven't got the currency.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Geelong probably do have the currency for those trades (unfortunately). There first next year would be about right for Bruhn and their first this year would get Henry (and would probably be overs at that). They get kissed on the dick in the Bowes trade and still get to use pick 7 this year.

 

[Keys]

We should do a Port.

Trade 2 and a future 2nd to GWS for 3 and 12.

Just forget about them and move on.

Fair chance if North get pick 1 and 2 one of them will be Cadman. Who I see as GWS main target.

This was raised earlier in one of the other threads and I agree it’s an option. Although I wasn’t as greedy and said 2 for 3 and 15

We still then have the option of using 3 for 8 and Ports F1

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

I know we all go around circles here with these discussions.

But I can’t help but wonder if we have all written Warlaw off too early.

If he gets to pick 3 and the club has had a good interview with him and he’s tested well at the combine we would be mad to not take the risk on him.

The kid is the best player in the draft when he’s on the park. Better than Ashcroft.

Has a little bit of Judd about this story I know Judd was shoulders and Warlaw Hammies but still.

Imagine trading pick 2 out and he goes on to be the A grader from this draft.

I’d assumed he’d be North’s first pick anyway if they trade away JHF, so he wouldn’t be available.

 

[new breed]

Hope this isn't left until next Wednesday....

Week and a half for this mumbo jumbo happens every year there should be an AFL moderator to overlook trades so clubs like poor old GC dont get ripped off and other teams advantage like Bullies in the schoolyard .

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

Houston, we have a different version of events.