Why are you here?Let’s not let facts get in the way
1x Daicos
Josh Daicos was picked up with Pies last pick, 57. Don’t think he received a bid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why are you here?Let’s not let facts get in the way
1x Daicos
Josh Daicos was picked up with Pies last pick, 57. Don’t think he received a bid
So the pertinent question is, when has a change in AFL rules had an immediate / direct and disproportionate benefit for us?Correct. Everyone had access.
Walker was available to anyone. We didn’t get any special treatment there.Walker
Only difference is the league wanted to sanction us, but tried to get Essendon off by going up against the world anti doping authority!I think we got the same draft sanctions as Essendon for our promise to trade Tippett for a 2nd round pick as Essendon did for doping their whole list!
Never has, never will. It’s by design.So the pertinent question is, when has a change in AFL rules had an immediate / direct and disproportionate benefit for us?
Only difference is the league wanted to sanction us, but tried to get Essendon off by going up against the world anti doping authority!
Never has, never will. It’s by design.
If we ever win another flag it will be one of the all time biggest middle fingers to AFL House.
We just have to hope it's a grand final against a non-vic team, that's all.Nah, the AFL wont mind because we bring an army of supporters. But they no doubt bend rules to assist Vic based clubs.
Just setting the record straight re DaicosWhy are you here?
I think we got the same draft sanctions as Essendon for our promise to trade Tippett for a 2nd round pick as Essendon did for doping their whole list!
Nope. We got double.
Cool now do Geelong.why is it important for people to deliberately ignore the breach regarding funnelling sponsorship dollars from balfours to Tippett.
Cool now do Geelong.
EABD flogLet’s not let facts get in the way
1x Daicos
Josh Daicos was picked up with Pies last pick, 57. Don’t think he received a bid
Don’t forget that the VFL changed the rules when we were negotiating a trade with Geelong. In the middle of the trade negotiations.So AFL tinkering that has a direct / immediate negative impact on us:
- Gibbs f/s qualification
- Noah Anderson priority pick
- academy bidding / matching rules (Keeler)
- academy bidding / matching rules and ability to stockpile picks (JUH instead of TT)
- others?
What? They got pick 1 out of it.I think we got the same draft sanctions as Essendon for our promise to trade Tippett for a 2nd round pick as Essendon did for doping their whole list!
Rookie upgrades can be used to fill some of the four spotsthere is a cost though because the list spot needs to be vacant on draft night to use the picks. So if you use 5 picks to get number 1 then you're adding 4 players to the list with very late picks. So it has an impact on the total value of your list.
I like cubs (of the bear persuasion). They're cute.So Adelaide people no rile can EVER be changed or reformed because there always will be cub that can be said to be disadvantaged by the change.
This stuff the league what in it for MY club over everything else.
Every cubs supporters has a tale of woe how their cubs was uniquely stuffed over by the AFL, the media, the umpires, the gnomes of Zurich.
So Adelaide people no rile can EVER be changed or reformed because there always will be cub that can be said to be disadvantaged by the change.
This stuff the league what in it for MY club over everything else.
Every cubs supporters has a tale of woe how their cubs was uniquely stuffed over by the AFL, the media, the umpires, the gnomes of Zurich.
Yeah reckon so.Probably best you jog on now.
Yeah reckon so.
No one likes objectivity it's why everyone hates the umps. It;s just unnatural in football.
I'd be happy for the rule change..So Adelaide people no rule can EVER be changed or reformed because there always will be cub that can be said to be disadvantaged by the change.
This stuff the league what in it for MY club over everything else.
Every clubs supporters has a tale of woe how their cubs was uniquely stuffed over by the AFL, the media, the umpires, the gnomes of Zurich.
Point us to one rule change in the last 30 years that had an immediate, direct and disproportionate negative impact on Collingwood and I’ll pay attention to what you’ve got to say.Yeah reckon so.
No one likes objectivity it's why everyone hates the umps. It;s just unnatural in football.