- Thread starter
- #2,491
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep, the closing date was yesterday and the clubs don't seem to be in rush to notify their supporters officially.I am hoping very soon because I thought it was originally meant to be yesterday? That's a page we have too and there's a lot of ??? about them at this stage. Surely by tomorrow I'd think.
Yeah I'm more interested in the fringe ones than anything else, just to know if to include them on the list.Yep, the cosing date was yesterday and the clubs don't seem to be in rush to notify their supporters officially.
Do the same rules apply to the nga kids as the Northern academy kids?Yeah I'm more interested in the fringe ones than anything else, just to know if to include them on the list.
I think they can nominate any NGA, but they either say main draft or rookie or not at all. So main draft have an option to match in main draft (but have to take them with the last pick), rookie (get them rookie but if a club bids main they get them), or just open draft no matching capabilities.Do the same rules apply to the nga kids as the Northern academy kids?
We can only nominate academy kids who played at the National Championships.
Interesting that if you nominate an nga kid, you’re committed to drafting them in the National Draft with your last selection.I think they can nominate any NGA, but they either say main draft or rookie or not at all. So main draft have an option to match in main draft (but have to take them with the last pick), rookie (get them rookie but if a club bids main they get them), or just open draft no matching capabilities.
Interesting that if you nominate an nga kid, you’re committed to drafting them in the National Draft with your last selection.
??I’m considering a bit of a bolter into my top 25. I think this name will surprise a lot of people, going back and watching Victorian footage has convinced me that this kid should be in top 30 consideration.
eDPS ?I assumed it was McMahon based on the BF Phantom
My rankings update will come next Friday so you can all wait till then. Things have shuffled a bit after all this footage and debating between players.
My rankings update will come next Friday so you can all wait till then. Things have shuffled a bit after all this footage and debating between players.
That's 100% untrue.Interesting that if you nominate an nga kid, you’re committed to drafting them in the National Draft with your last selection.
That’s what I thought, but I was confirming what Pie 4 Life said.That's 100% untrue.
NGA kids who you nominate and are not selected in the main draft are automatically made Cat B rookies.
Maybe it’s father-sons I’m thinking of? I know that there was definitely a rule in place that if you nominate a player in the main draft you have to take them. You could nominate them for the rookie draft and get them free but if they got picked in the main draft then they were free game.That’s what I thought, but I was confirming what Pie 4 Life said.
That’s what I thought, but I was confirming what Pie 4 Life said.
Yep, confirmed I've got my wires crossed.Maybe it’s father-sons I’m thinking of? I know that there was definitely a rule in place that if you nominate a player in the main draft you have to take them. You could nominate them for the rookie draft and get them free but if they got picked in the main draft then they were free game.
I’ll go back and have a look because I remember instances of this happening.
Yep, confirmed I've got my wires crossed.
"8.8 Father/Son Rookie Pre-Selection (a) Subject to Rule 8.8(b), where an eligible Father/Son Player has been nominated in accordance with Rule 8.4(b) and is not selected at a National Draft or PreSeason Draft Selection Meeting, the Club with whom he is eligible as a 57 Father/Son Player may include him on its Rookie List prior to the Rookie Draft Selection Meeting in accordance with Rule 10.4."
Just out of interest, what’s the source you got this from? I’ve looked before for a definitive ‘Draft Rules’ and haven’t been able to find it, have just had to go off articles that mention specific rules.
Interesting it says you MAY include them on the rookie list. I don't think you are thus compelled to.Yep, confirmed I've got my wires crossed.
"8.8 Father/Son Rookie Pre-Selection (a) Subject to Rule 8.8(b), where an eligible Father/Son Player has been nominated in accordance with Rule 8.4(b) and is not selected at a National Draft or PreSeason Draft Selection Meeting, the Club with whom he is eligible as a 57 Father/Son Player may include him on its Rookie List prior to the Rookie Draft Selection Meeting in accordance with Rule 10.4."
Yeah it’s only if you nominate them for the National you have to take them with the last pick. An example is Josh DaicosInteresting it says you MAY include them on the rookie list. I don't think you are thus compelled to.
Crows nominated Ben Jarman for the ND and took him in the rookie draft when he wasn't bid on, so you don't have to take them in the ND.Yeah it’s only if you nominate them for the National you have to take them with the last pick. An example is Josh Daicosnow I think about it. No one bid and Pies had to take him with their last pick. Whereas Jackson Edwards was a case of nominating for the rookie draft (and he made it there) but if someone had bid on the national, there was no way for the Crows to match.PLAYERCARDSTART7Josh Daicos
- Age
- 25
- Ht
- 178cm
- Wt
- 77kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 15.6
- 4star
- K
- 8.3
- 3star
- HB
- 7.3
- 5star
- M
- 3.3
- 3star
- T
- 3.6
- 5star
- CL
- 1.3
- 3star
- D
- 16.2
- 4star
- K
- 9.2
- 4star
- HB
- 7.0
- 4star
- M
- 3.3
- 3star
- T
- 3.5
- 4star
- CL
- 1.5
- 4star
- D
- 13.8
- 4star
- K
- 7.6
- 3star
- HB
- 6.2
- 4star
- M
- 3.2
- 4star
- T
- 4.2
- 5star
- CL
- 1.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
Was that for the ND? It just says nominated him and too early to determine list positions. Could they have nominated him for the rookie without specifying? Genuinely curious because the rule that changed the season before that was the one I believe to be in use today.Crows nominated Ben Jarman for the ND and took him in the rookie draft when he wasn't bid on, so you don't have to take them in the ND.
Crows nominate Jarman
Adelaide has nominated Ben Jarman as a potential father-son recruit at the AFL draftwww.afc.com.au
Almost 100% it's the ND.Was that for the ND? It just says nominated him and too early to determine list positions. Could they have nominated him for the rookie without specifying? Genuinely curious because the rule that changed the season before that was the one I believe to be in use today.
I've gone to look at the 2020 AFL Draft Guide booklet and this is the page.Almost 100% it's the ND.
“There are no guarantees for us or Ben,” Reid said.
“We will be true to our talent order and there is still plenty of work to be done between now and the national draft (on November 25)."
No guarantees means it's not the rookie draft, and talk of the ND too