- Aug 20, 2010
- 6,356
- 12,684
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Manchester City
OP needs a lot more thought before posting.
From Freo - Fyfe is the only elite mid.
From Freo - Fyfe is the only elite mid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ollie Wines stiff not to get a mention
Thread needs more Richmond supporters claiming delidio is better than Stanton.
I agree that Jobe has been elite for a couple of years now. Would like to see him do it for a few more seasons then no one will doubt him. Longevity of elite status is what I should have mentioned in my post. There are some that have had a couple of great seasons then taper off. The others mentioned have done it for several seasons. Hope this makes sense.If Watson doesn't sit amongst those four, then I have no idea what elite is.
That's including the game where Stanton got 8 disposals and was subbed off due to an injury.http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...d1=1484&tid2=6&pid2=1347&type=A&fid1=S&fid2=S
stats don't lie - they're pretty much neck and neck in regards to the numbers. Arguable that lids is slightly ahead imo due to uncontested possessions, 1 percenters and disposal efficiency - depends which stats you value more??? I am not doing to declare that anyone is "better"
I'm going to assume that, statistically, each team MIGHT have one elite midfielder, and a couple of lucky teams might have two. So, quite arbitrarily, I'm going to restrict the number of 'Elite' midfielders in the AFL to twenty. At this stage of 2013, who might those twenty be? Now, obviously, I have not seen every game, so must rely often on reports of good form. That said, here's twenty who seem to be 'Elite' in 2013:
Adelaide: Dangerfield
Carlton: Murphy, Judd
Collingwood: Pendlebury, Swan
Essendon: Watson, Stanton, Goddard, Heppell
Fremantle: Barlow
Geelong: Selwood, Bartel, Johnson
GWS:
Hawthorn: Mitchell, Hodge
Melbourne:
North: Swallow
Port Adelaide: Boak
Richmond: Cotchin
St Kilda:
Sydney: Kennedy, Jack
West Coast:
Western Bulldogs:
Not surprisingly, the teams that are currently well-placed have had more midfielders at the elite level than have the strugglers. I'm certain to have overlooked some players, but, remember, before anyone can be included on this list, some one has to be excluded.
You don't honestly think Gibson is anywhere close to Stanton do you?
I agree with you totally. Most teams have one elite player and plenty of A grades. There are probably only 4 "elite" mids in the whole comp that can produce serious quality posessions, clearances, etc. Ablett, Mitchell, Selwood and Pendles. They are true mids that have proved their elite abilities. The rest of the so called "elite" are A grade players.
That's including the game where Stanton got 8 disposals and was subbed off due to an injury.
Ollie Wines stiff not to get a mention
Oh FFS.
In other words, he is an extremely poor man's Stanton.Both are very similar players- gutrunners who get a lot of disposals for average impact. Stanton has the runs on the board and is the better player but i am making the point Stanton is not a very unique player and should no way known be considered elite.
In other words, he is an extremely poor man's Stanton.
You make mention that Stanton has average impact, why is it that coaches want to tag him? If he really isn't damaging, surely the likes of Goddard and Zaharakis attract opposition attention rather than Stanton.
Funny cause all year, tags have still come his way whilst Goddard and Zaharakis run free. Off the top of my head, Van Berlo, Farren Ray, Crowley and Scully have tagged him in the space of 6 games.Simply because he finds a tonne of the ball and a part from watson there was not much else. Doubt he will be getting as much attention anymore with the improvement of zaharakis and inclusion of goddard into the team who are more damaging players.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...d1=1484&tid2=6&pid2=1347&type=A&fid1=S&fid2=S
stats don't lie - they're pretty much neck and neck in regards to the numbers. Arguable that lids is slightly ahead imo due to uncontested possessions, 1 percenters and disposal efficiency - depends which stats you value more??? I am not doing to declare that anyone is "better"
I'd rate them the same.
His game against Freo was pretty ordinary as well. Crowley shut him down pretty well.
Top 5 in the league:
Patrick Dangerfield
Nat Fyfe
Gary Ablett
Josh Kennedy
Scott Pendlebury
Top 5 in the league:
Patrick Dangerfield
Nat Fyfe
Gary Ablett
Josh Kennedy
Scott Pendlebury
That list needs to be culled
Adelaide: Dangerfield
Carlton: Judd , Murphy
Collingwood: Pendlebury, Swan , Beams
Essendon: Watson
Fremantle: Fyfe
Gold Coast: Ablett
Geelong: Selwood Johnson , Bartel
GWS:
Hawthorn: Hodge, Mitchell
Melbourne:
North: Swallow
Port Adelaide:
Richmond: Cotchin, deledio
St Kilda:
Sydney: Kennedy , Jack
West Coast:
Western Bulldogs:
IMO the Players in bold writing are elite super stars in the league and the ones in the red are A graders
Mitchell not bolded? He's only come runner up in the last two Brownlows.
Hocking man handled Dangerfield in the first game this year. Cant be considered top 5 on this year alone. Last two game have been good but not consistent enoughTop 5 in the league:
Patrick Dangerfield
Nat Fyfe
Gary Ablett
Josh Kennedy
Scott Pendlebury