Yep, had a fair bit around the tummy that surprised me. Didn't seem to affect his performance though, and I expect it will disappear over the next few weeks.Did Ablett look fat to anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep, had a fair bit around the tummy that surprised me. Didn't seem to affect his performance though, and I expect it will disappear over the next few weeks.Did Ablett look fat to anyone?
Geelong are a very rare case. Our game plan is perfect for KP and sucks at the MCG. Let's see how the match results bear this out.Sorry but that is absolute garbage. Home court advantage is no less pronounced in the NBA where every court has the same dimensions. It's the crowd that makes the massive majority of the difference. I could list sport after sport after sport to prove my point by you get the idea.
I though it was a vest , but if it’s a bit of fat it’ll go soon enoughYep, had a fair bit around the tummy that surprised me. Didn't seem to affect his performance though, and I expect it will disappear over the next few weeks.
It was good we kept Easter Monday Games close all those years by playing them away.
Am I the only one who thought Danger was ordinary?
Can't say I'm a fan of the fake crowd noise. They added it so that the game sounded more 'realistic'. Hearing any cheering at all at Geelong when the opposition kicks a goal is hardly realistic.
Loved Stanley's game - keep him there and stop stuffing around with the ruck. I really don't know about Sav, and I seriously wonder if he's had his eyes tested. Seems to misjudge the ball when it's coming towards him every time. I don't think his confidence is great either, seems to throw his hands up to create a contest but not really in the way players do if they think they have a chance of taking the mark. Henry I'm not sure about either, he had such a great first season and then seems to have fallen off a cliff since. I do love Atkins' work, I think he's pretty under-rated on this board because he's not seen doing the sexy stuff. But gee he does the hard stuff and never gives up, with some unheralded grunt in the forward line he creates a lot of turnovers that often make others look good. Rohan had a Rohan game. He'll usually be quiet and then have a game where he makes it his own. It wasn't his night tonight, but he wasn't a liability so I'm happy with him staying in.
The defence looked a bit suspect in the first half, hopefully just a bit of rustiness. I would prefer to see Clark in though.
The small forwards were great tonight, although Hawthorn going in with such a tall backline made it easy for them. Miers, what a great story. It doesn't matter where you're picked in the draft, I love to see a young bloke work his butt off and grab his opportunities with both hands.
We looked far fitter than the other three teams that have played Round 2 so far, great to see. Fabulous to see Joel looking so fresh too, the break was good for some things.
Good stuff.
Henry had a bad game but has generally shown himself to be good enough. The problem for me is that while individually they are talented, the backline as a unit is top-heavy and far too defensive-minded. I'd really like us to set up a defense specifically to combat Collingwood and Richmond and play at the MCG which for me would mean becoming more mobile and improving the ability to move the ball out of the backline.
Am I the only one who thought Danger was ordinary?
Did Ablett look fat to anyone?
Henry had a bad game but has generally shown himself to be good enough. The problem for me is that while individually they are talented, the backline as a unit is top-heavy and far too defensive-minded. I'd really like us to set up a defense specifically to combat Collingwood and Richmond and play at the MCG which for me would mean becoming more mobile and improving the ability to move the ball out of the backline.
Selwood and Ablett look fresh as daisies. Narkle looks in great shape. Duncan looks much better than he did in Round 1. Stanley best game for a long time. Not many negatives!
Completely agree. Was never going to match the atmosphere of the real deal but given the difficulty of capturing authentic crowd noise I think they did a great job. I was skeptic going in but it won me over. If the choice is artificial crowd sound vs real crowd then obviously it's no contest, real crowd is miles better. But if the choice is artificial crowd sound vs an eerie silent vaccuum where atmosphere should be, then I'm choosing artificial crowd sound every time. It wasn't a perfect recreation of the real thing - it was never going to be and never could be - but it added immersion and made me more invested in the experience. Zero noise leads to this odd feeling of detachment from the spectacle. It's weird.
No... these guys stats are interesting... Danger well down that listAm I the only one who thought Danger was ordinary?
Miers....well what can you say. His work rate is something to behold. To top it off, he gets the footy and then does something with it. Yes, his "hook foot" approach to kicking looks problematic, but right now it works and works well. And when he gets the ball close to goal, its almost "shut the gate" as he slots them on either side of his body and rarely misses.
Doubt it. Unlike others our players don't go down like a bag of shit when slung or hard tackled.