ibuprofen
The Impaler.
They are the same height... I thought it was obvious.Trouble is Kreuger isn’t any good or he would be playing. Cameron is a proven performer, not sure how you can compare the two.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
They are the same height... I thought it was obvious.Trouble is Kreuger isn’t any good or he would be playing. Cameron is a proven performer, not sure how you can compare the two.
Trouble is Kreuger isn’t any good or he would be playing. Cameron is a proven performer, not sure how you can compare the two.
Id also enquire about Hunt... can play both ends, speed to burn..
Are we offering an extra year? Then the 150k extra might actually be worth 900k. Club assumes a bit more risk. I'm just saying there's more to contracts than just the salary.I'm not sure the cap is dropping. Last time I heard, it wasn't.
And also, I thought all contracts were being negotiated under the old system and then would be scaled back later. Hence, 700k is probably more like 550k.
With all due respect, I'm not signing Henry and Parfitt like they have recently if it means losing Cameron. I'm sacking both immediately if it gets me Cameron. Anyone who wouldn't is out right bonkers.
He is a bona fide star.
Id also enquire about Hunt... can play both ends, speed to burn..
Not sure ibuprofen is the right prescription. Perhaps a bex and a lie down as they used to say.Yes it is but there is no agreement on that. Last I time I saw publicly, it was being opposed. Hence, the delay. Everyone has to agree and they don't at this stage. Hence, contracts being negotiated as normal and then scaled back later.
Henry and Parfitt both have upside but this is Jeremy Cameron. He is Dangerfield, Selwood level. With all due respect, Parfitt and Henry both will be fine players but nothing compared to a Jeremy Cameron.
So if the club could trade Henry and Parfitt for Cameron, you would say no? Reality is that they could probably trade both for picks and then sign Cameron as a FA.
Give him 800 per year, done deal!We dont overpay players, this is common knowledge, if he wants more than 750k after the mediocre year he just had then good luck to him but he wont get it here.
So you would or wouldn't trade Henry and Parfitt for Cameron? Thats essentially what I said. No need for insults when its a pretty simple proposition.Not sure ibuprofen is the right prescription. Perhaps a bex and a lie down as they used to say.
Id also enquire about Hunt... can play both ends, speed to burn..
Why is that good news?Both good news if true.
Give him 800 per year, done deal!
Hey, insulting is suggesting we trade two of our best young players when we don’t lack trade currency elsewhere.So you would or wouldn't trade Henry and Parfitt for Cameron? Thats essentially what I said. No need for insults when its a pretty simple proposition.
Why is that good news?
The poster did say we are offering more, just "not much more" could be 701k, could be 800+If they are offering that their cap is stuffed and if be surprised if we aren't offering more he's worth more.
Insulting? This is a trade board and Parfitt's name already appears on here.Hey, insulting is suggesting we trade two of our best young players when we don’t lack trade currency elsewhere.
The cull will be savage as a likely 38+2+2 means we have to get rid of at least 4 players plus you need three draft picks. I also think when we have three firsts, we will probably use them anyway.
Highly Likely: Ablett, Cockatoo, Constable, Narkle, Taylor.
Likely/ Almost Definite: Brownless, Parsons
That gets us to having three draft picks and no Free Agents
Very Nervous: Kennerly, Fort
That allows us to bring two players in I.e. Higgins and Crouch. I think Fort probably goes as Stanley/Esava probably is enough for the moment and if they need they have to throw Jenkins or De Koenig in. I think Jenkins wins over Fort just as he can be a back up forward also. We are also looking at the Cat B rookie too so we can't have to many ruckman on the list.
Possible: Zuthrie, Fogarty, Jenkins, Atkins
I think Atkins and Fogarty is the most trouble of the next group depending who else they might consider bringing in. I like Atkins but in a savage world.
True, he gets another year to prove it, he doesnt look to be in the same category as Cameron however.Huh? How many opportunities has Kreuger had in this weird season given there's no VFL to prove his case?
Stretch to say he isn't any good.
I think the main thing is that if you trade two kids who are best 22 you weaken the proposition by more than the dollars add. When you offer a player a contract you're selling the club not the dollars especially if that player is one who doesn't win his own f50 entries.So you would or wouldn't trade Henry and Parfitt for Cameron? Thats essentially what I said. No need for insults when its a pretty simple proposition.
Insulting? This is a trade board and Parfitt's name already appears on here.
Attack the idea not some snide remark about me needing medication.
So you wouldn't clear room for the premier key forward in the league when you could have him for free?
Are you seriously projecting that Parfitt and Henry will out achieve Jeremy Cameron?
I'd do both, as someone said before, the Brent Moloney move. It may not be a direct trade but if they eat up cap space we need for him, its the same principle.
I don't think pick 9 counts as plenty but I dothink that gws won't have the cap to match.We should not trade for FA players under any circumstances If Cameron wants us GWS will get pick 9 which will be plenty.
Goldy and Higgins are 2 years to old to be paying a 1st rounder for no 33+ year olds go for anywhere near that unless they are generational players which those two are not.
And if we are going after Higgins just get Crouch or Viney instead if we want a mature age player and keep our draft picks for the draft.
But we allegedly according to media reports don't have room to sign Cameron? I used Parfitt and Henry as an example as both have recently re-signed.Parfitt doesn't need to go though and he is worth more to us than what draft pick we would get for him. Worst case scenario if we need TPP for free agents we can move all of cocky Narkle CC Fogarty Simpson zuthrie etc on which will create plenty of $..if you're in that boat it's better to retain best 22 players (parfitt) and move on non best 22 ones (up to a point because you need some depth).
I'm a bit of a fan of Jayden Hunt...I wasn't aware he was on the table...
I mean plenty in the sense that he has done his time and is now a FA if they wanted more they should of tried to trade him last year (if they knew he was leaving)I don't think pick 9 counts as plenty but I dothink that gws won't have the cap to match.