It appears to be the sort of draft that there is a fair bit of unpredictability between 15-30. I’ve now seen a number of phantoms and in every case there are players that look more attractive to me than the ones taken even if we retain our current picks but also there are situations with a couple of others where it would have been prudent to trade up to secure a particular player that otherwise wouldn’t have been available. Assuming we have the flexibility to trade up on the night if we wish then we have the best of both worlds.
With the lack of footy the last two years... it has the potential to be a dogs breakfast ..and they are the pro's
It would be diverting to look at who all these phantoms have us taking ...who knows there might be someone who gets it spot on. Even in our phantom I have no doubt if we all picked for Geelong with the players available we would come up with a different players selected, sometimes thru taste and some times thru ignorance. We probably just have not seen enough footy to make reasonable judgments..... and after all that we will still have players that mostly R2 picks. ..and no matter who we pick...id say statistically we probably will be doing well to get 2 players that play 100 games+
If we can replicate 2016 and get three players that will get to 100 plus and a B&F winner we will have done exceedingly well.