Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To paraphrase, it’s the worst system except for all the others…
I don’t know of many ways it could be improved. I have raised previously the idea of struggling clubs getting more cap space temporarily to attract talent. I think that would work better than priority picks. Perhaps another thing would be to provide some cap bonus for retained players. Maybe if you have been at a club longer than 5 years only 90% of your salary counts under the cap. Six years = 80%, etc. That might encourage some stability and loyalty to the better run clubs. I’d want to think about that more though.
To paraphrase, it’s the worst system except for all the others…
I don’t know of many ways it could be improved. I have raised previously the idea of struggling clubs getting more cap space temporarily to attract talent. I think that would work better than priority picks. Perhaps another thing would be to provide some cap bonus for retained players. Maybe if you have been at a club longer than 5 years only 90% of your salary counts under the cap. Six years = 80%, etc. That might encourage some stability and loyalty to the better run clubs. I’d want to think about that more though.
Pls have your chauffeur write up some detailed notes for usBack from watching the APS top of the table game Caulfield GS v Brighton GS. Ended up a draw after Caulfield had a 6 goal lead at once stage and had been the dominant team all season. Some really impressive kids out there.
Pls have your chauffeur write up some detailed notes for us
Even weirder when you consider that the bottom clubs still have to pay 95% of their cap as an average across a rolling period. So North have to pay all their spuds overs, just to satisfy a minimum cap rule, and it leaves them with no money to attract actual talent. I could understand a minimum cap in the 50-75% range, but 95% is just stupid.Its a weird system. The top side pays as much as the bottom in sal cap..., it's the reward of the experience outside of pure football that one probably gets better value from.
Iv been pushing to get Hopper for years, but this he has been really below average.. yes his had a knee injury but this still doesn't look goodThe more I see Hopper & Bruhn... The less I want them.
Another Carey Grammar boy (although only just came in). His stocks are rising and I think he will be a bolter. Only real knock is his skills are average and decision making - but athleticism is off the charts with really good size, so will excite recruiters in terms of what he could be.Kid called Josh Weddle is apparently worth a look. Plays for Carey and Oakleigh Chargers. Heard some good wraps.
Another Carey Grammar boy (although only just came in). His stocks are rising and I think he will be a bolter. Only real knock is his skills are average and decision making - but athleticism is off the charts with really good size, so will excite recruiters in terms of what he could be.
Playing off the backline for now
That’s fair. The results speak for themselves.The salary cap discussion over the past few pages is somewhat baffling to me. The AFL has the most effective equalisation system in world sport. Since the salary cap was implemented in 1987, 13 different clubs have won premierships and every single active club besides Gold Coast has made at least one grand final. Every if you take a smaller sample size and just look at the distribution of success since the turn of the century, there have been 11 different premiers since 2000, and 15 different grand finalists. Compare that to other sports leagues around the world.
The system doesn't just work, it works extremely well. It doesn't need to be reformed at all. We should be proud of the way we do equalisation in the AFL.
Just because it works (and works well for the most part) doesn't mean it doesn't have room for improvement. Why should a team full of kids (like North) have to pay out 95% of their cap minimum? You end up being stuck with players who are overpaid purely due to salary cap rules. That's my biggest gripe, and it puts a barrier on North being able to bring in new and better talent.The salary cap discussion over the past few pages is somewhat baffling to me. The AFL has the most effective equalisation system in world sport. Since the salary cap was implemented in 1987, 13 different clubs have won premierships and every single active club besides Gold Coast has made at least one grand final. Every if you take a smaller sample size and just look at the distribution of success since the turn of the century, there have been 11 different premiers since 2000, and 15 different grand finalists. Compare that to other sports leagues around the world and I see no basis to complain.
The system doesn't just work, it works extremely well. It doesn't need to be reformed at all. We should be proud of the way we do equalisation in the AFL.
It wasn’t that long ago that Melb weee in the same boat, things can change very quicklyJust because it works (and works well for the most part) doesn't mean it doesn't have room for improvement. Why should a team full of kids (like North) have to pay out 95% of their cap minimum? You end up being stuck with players who are overpaid purely due to salary cap rules. That's my biggest gripe, and it puts a barrier on North being able to bring in new and better talent.
I am fine with getting Hopper as long as we don't over payHopper they say he is our number 1 target, so i think we will get him and is good mates with Cameron, like it or hate it we will get him
What you think we will have to cop up in picksHopper they say he is our number 1 target, so i think we will get him and is good mates with Cameron, like it or hate it we will get him
Hard to say as GWS mite hate us and want to screw us or could be 2 2nd rd picks, i just don't noWhat you think we will have to cop up in picks
Kid called Josh Weddle is apparently worth a look. Plays for Carey and Oakleigh Chargers. Heard some good wraps.
I mentioned him in the games I watched. Probably not what we need though For a name..my bet we look at Binns in the draft
Sounds like a Wells targetAnother Carey Grammar boy (although only just came in). His stocks are rising and I think he will be a bolter. Only real knock is his skills are average and decision making - but athleticism is off the charts with really good size, so will excite recruiters in terms of what he could be.
Playing off the backline for now
Sounds like a Wells target