Analysis Hawks 2022 Hypothetical trades (read the pinned post)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2
Firstly, the "No Kane Cornes" Rule is back




 
Last edited by a moderator:
None of our midfielders are any good, and Amon and Maginness don't exist apparently

It's a known fact that journos and AFL pundits average watching 3-4 games a week (I doubt it's even that). They've probably never seen the mentioned play!
 
I like that you guys have got a sense of humer at least ,but seriously hows Jom's knee ?
Only missed 14 games in the past 5 seasons, not all due to knee issues. Actually been very durable. Has lost his youthful pace but still pretty quick. Looks slower than he is because he is bulky
 

Log in to remove this ad.

so Geelong dont want Cooper Stephens so i guess we'll get him cheaper than normal, he was a solid tall midfielder, did his ACL prior to draft, has not dominated at the cats, but could be a good piece for our developing midfield going forward?
Has had his moments in the VFL this year. Just needs to translate into the the AFL. The next Clark at freo i hope, as in killing it in the AFl in 2023 at the Hawks.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221012-132138_Instagram.jpg
    Screenshot_20221012-132138_Instagram.jpg
    260.3 KB · Views: 104
Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.
 
Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.
Wait for draft night. If he is, throw the book at it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.

We have weeks to look at that, doubt its a high priority for the next 1.5 hours
 
Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.
Dodildo would want pick 1 and a future first for pick 4...
 
Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.
Don’t think sheezel will make it to 4. But in theory, I’m ok with the idea of trading up if it guarantees us the player we want.
 
I like that you guys have got a sense of humer at least ,but seriously hows Jom's knee ?
Played 21 games this year and 18 last year. We seem to have got his management right with it - he's actually been a very durable player for us since he arrived despite one season missing a chunk of games.
His work loads are managed heavily, often will miss training sessions.

If he goes to you guys you'll get a dam handy player, he's been bloody good for us this year
 
I like that you guys have got a sense of humer at least ,but seriously hows Jom's knee ?
Ok, on a serious note , he needed a reco 3 years ago. We wanted no part of it, we chose an alternative east meets west meets north advance medical technique fused with ancient Mayan practices and early gospel songs from Destiny’s foster Child.

In simple terms , We stick it together with blue tack and a little bit of spit before each game.
 
Interesting to hear the bombers are open to trading pick 4. If Sheezel is still available do we consider 6+ 21/27 to move up for him?

Unlikely, but they seem open to it.

GC won’t take him, he’s clearly a huge flight risk.

Don's want McKenzie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top