Analysis Hawks 2022 Hypothetical trades (read the pinned post)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2
Firstly, the "No Kane Cornes" Rule is back




 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am pretty happy out with the old in with the new - at least we won’t be reading next year after the loses about the hack kicks by Titch into the f50 or the lack of pace O’Meara has and lack of kicking power etc etc etc - be interesting to see how O’Meara will go with all the travelling he will have to do now

Sammy i trust and through thick and thin ALWAYS HAWTHORN for me
 

Log in to remove this ad.

He missed his entire first year with an ankle injury and his 2nd season was injury interrupted too

This is his first full year of football in the system.
Yeah but he has now had multiple injuries, not proven himself at AFL level.

You take him as a low risk option or you don't take him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We now have 41,48,50 & 52 = Around 1200 pts
The lions have 34 & 35 which is 1000 pts

Surely McKenzie is making that call
Biggest sticking point will be Brisbanes available list spots. At the end of the day we traded two players, got two young players in in positions we need and some extra currency. The details on how much salary we’re paying elsewhere will be the decider on how good the trades are for me. Given the returns in terms of draft picks it should be low but I’m scared that’s not the case.
 
Mitchell, O’Meara, Gunston, McEvoy, Shiels all gone in one off season. A damn lot of experience we have cut ultra deep. Huge risk, interested to see how it all pans out.

Some big responsibility coming on to a lot of guys now young and old. Really keen to see whos up to it, we’re in for a tough year
 
looking forward to tomorrow's media rating our trade period a 'C'. :drunk:
Surely they will rate it a D-F : "traded out experienced players, didn't get anyone" (conveniently ignoring Amon)

Alternatively, if we didn't trade Mitchell & O'Meara - also D-F : "They didn't do anything/they didn't improve their list" (again, conveniently ignoring Amon)
 
To the histrionics brigade over the Mitchell trade. If this is the best we could yield out of him over 2 seasons of having him on the block - what makes you think we’d get a better deal next year when he’s a year older and out of contract?
 
I don’t understand the angst.

We’ve effectively brought in another ruckman in Meek, an inside midfielder in Stephens and additional draft picks.

And we gave up two players who clearly didn’t function well within our midfield rotations, weren’t part of our future plans, probably don’t have too many years remaining and received zero bites last year when we tried to ship them off. I’m not sure why people think their stocks would’ve risen after another year?

Yes, we may have obtained another late first round pick if JOM chose GWS, but unfortunately he wanted to go to Fremantle. Nothing MM could do about that.

We lost zero draft capital whilst bringing in two young players who haven’t been given opportunities at their respective clubs - and who will probably surprise quite a few next year.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Stephens has what 12 games since being drafted in 2019?

Shafted.
In top sides, guys picked at #16 don’t just waltz into the midfield straight away.

Broken leg in u18 year. Missed half of 2021 with an ankle.

Proper pre-season in 2022 and he managed 7 games in a premiership team.

He will walk straight in and stand next to McDonald and Ward in the pecking order.

188cm and probably 88kgs next year.

Just what we need and Geelong can’t carry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top