News Izak Rankine, Gold coast holding Rankine to Ransom- #FreeIzak

What will be the trade with the Suns? (Crows posters only, NO opposition supporters)


  • Total voters
    220
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol...you cant but help admire the Fireman..not a top line player (unless going to Port)...but we should give up our most valuable players for him...

Port Adelaide legend Kane Cornes wasn’t yet convinced Rankine is going to be a “top liner,” but emphasised the Crows would have to give up something given he’s not a free agent — proposing a swap for Riley Thilthorpe or a package of Josh Rachele and Darcy Fogarty if draft picks don’t appease the Suns.
 
Lol...you cant but help admire the Fireman..not a top line player (unless going to Port)...but we should give up our most valuable players for him...

Port Adelaide legend Kane Cornes wasn’t yet convinced Rankine is going to be a “top liner,” but emphasised the Crows would have to give up something given he’s not a free agent — proposing a swap for Riley Thilthorpe or a package of Josh Rachele and Darcy Fogarty if draft picks don’t appease the Suns.
He's such a waste of space.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Lol...you cant but help admire the Fireman..not a top line player (unless going to Port)...but we should give up our most valuable players for him...

Port Adelaide legend Kane Cornes wasn’t yet convinced Rankine is going to be a “top liner,” but emphasised the Crows would have to give up something given he’s not a free agent — proposing a swap for Riley Thilthorpe or a package of Josh Rachele and Darcy Fogarty if draft picks don’t appease the Suns.

Lul wut....
 
Lol...you cant but help admire the Fireman..not a top line player (unless going to Port)...but we should give up our most valuable players for him...

Port Adelaide legend Kane Cornes wasn’t yet convinced Rankine is going to be a “top liner,” but emphasised the Crows would have to give up something given he’s not a free agent — proposing a swap for Riley Thilthorpe or a package of Josh Rachele and Darcy Fogarty if draft picks don’t appease the Suns.

In the same breath, he would say the Port should entertain trading Gray and 2nd rounder for Rankine, as Gray brings experience and maturity into the Suns forward line with a straight face.
 
Yeah Ralph really sticks the boots in in that article. But his opinion of us is skewed...this is the same Jon Ralph who predicted Jake Kelly would be All Australian after moving to Essendon
Can u copy and paste text sections for the bros and dudettes here?
 
I don't mind Kane but that's a bad take. The money is virtually irrelevant given our current list.

It is really only about the trade. Pick four will get it done in some form without giving any of those names he mentioned. Not really sure what Gold Coast are standing firm on. Different if he was in contract.

I still think there will be a few twists. Only a few days until someone mentions Port and another club entering the race and then he will turn it back onto us claiming we have to get it done.and pay overs.
 
I don't mind Kane but that's a bad take. The money is virtually irrelevant given our current list.

It is really only about the trade. Pick four will get it done in some form without giving any of those names he mentioned. Not really sure what Gold Coast are standing firm on. Different if he was in contract.

I still think there will be a few twists. Only a few days until someone mentions Port and another club entering the race and then he will turn it back onto us claiming we have to get it done.and pay overs.
I also doubt the 800k is true. Probably 700k.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't mind Kane but that's a bad take. The money is virtually irrelevant given our current list.

It is really only about the trade. Pick four will get it done in some form without giving any of those names he mentioned. Not really sure what Gold Coast are standing firm on. Different if he was in contract.

I still think there will be a few twists. Only a few days until someone mentions Port and another club entering the race and then he will turn it back onto us claiming we have to get it done.and pay overs.
Why didn't he question the overpaying of Motlop, Rockliff and Lycett?
 
Last edited:
Bit of rumor on the GC board that they are approaching the AFL for some Ambassador type monies to help up Rankines contract

What I would say if that is the case that our club go straight to the AFL and in the strongest terms tell them they have no right to meddle in this and where was the meddling when all the other players left GC. This sort of stuff could cause deep rooted problems between clubs and the AFL if they are singling out specific clubs to punish like that on a possible trade offer
 
we should be telling Sloane right now.. if there is a contract for youat the end of 2023 it aint gonna be anymore than $200k and you’ll be captain of the SANFL side..

that‘ll free up a decent chunk of coin we can use to lure JHF..

Or just don't offer him a contract and save $200k because Sloane was beyond cooked prior to the ACL.
 
Yes opinions can change, basing it on one win against a flakey club that’s never won here seems a bit premature.

Having said that, Nicks changed selection strategy and game plan on the weekend, one of the complaints in my awesome thread.

But I tell you what, beat West Coast and I will take a REALLY off, win the last 3 and it will be another REALLY so it’s just s**t. Move Hamish on and the s**t can go too.
'my awesome thread' lol
 
Kane suggesting any player swap, let alone the names mentioned, just shows how misinformed his takes are. Player swaps just don’t happen, if a player wants to leave, it’s all about what picks make it happen, occasionally with a steak knives player thrown in. If Izak wants to come there’ll be several days of chest puffing from both sides, and then there’ll be some form of pick swap, that’s it.

The sad part is Kane knows this, he’s just writing shit he doesn’t believe for clicks again, and once again people have fallen for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top