Gtowncrow
Premiership Player
- Jul 6, 2021
- 3,165
- 4,031
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I'm not sure it's possible to go backwards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm not sure it's possible to go backwards.
Wasn't he in leadership group last year? Didn't he get dropped last year?Well that locks in ROB for another season
Fact remains, he WAS dropped even though in leadership group. Sloane WAS moved out of midfield (before he was injured). Keays WAS moved out of midfield too. I think Nicks has been showing us his hand, some just refuse to see it.Yes, he was dropped for 1 game.
There's no chance he gets dropped for half the season if he's underperforming again
He was dropped for 2 I reckon, but came back after only playing 1 really good game in the SANFL.Yes, he was dropped for 1 game.
There's no chance he gets dropped for half the season if he's underperforming again
Yep, missed rounds 9 and 10. Point is... he was dropped!He was dropped for 2 I reckon, but came back after only playing 1 really good game in the SANFL.
Needed to be dropped for longer.
I am just wondering if we are going to appoint a vice captain. I personally like to have a VC and I find it strange that some clubs prefer not make this appointment.. Its another way of rewarding a deserving individual. Are there any good reasons for not appointing a VC.
IMO it was a “here we’re doing something” rather than a “teach ROB that he needs to be better”Yep, missed rounds 9 and 10. Point is... he was dropped!
I think the idea was to light a fire under ROB by dropping him for 3 or 4 games but they chickened out when they saw Strachan get beaten pretty badly in the ruck. I think as a player motivation tactic it backfired as it only showed ROB that we have no viable alternative ruck. It's a recruiting/list management issue more than a selection issue.IMO it was a “here we’re doing something” rather than a “teach ROB that he needs to be better”
He didn’t have to show he could back up his one good game in the SANFL.
I agree that Dawson wouldn’t be able to dictate - but you would have to think if he genuinely believes it’s not the most effective spot for him to play he would have had the discussion. So Nicks has either given him reasons that he has got behind or we will see a change early in the year once the side settles down
As a number of people have observed - we have plenty of defenders fighting for a spot. If they think those guys are up to it then there would be no reason to hold Dawson back there, unless that is seen as his most valuable spot in this squad
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Our VCs used to be the pointers. Left the Captain to star on field and be the nice bloke off fieldI am just wondering if we are going to appoint a vice captain. I personally like to have a VC and I find it strange that some clubs prefer not make this appointment.. Its another way of rewarding a deserving individual. Are there any good reasons for not appointing a VC.
I agree - as per response to George
Not irrelevant though. Coach and captain relationship, and being aligned, is one of the most important within the footy club. You don’t think players get really annoyed if they are played out of position or not in a position that beat helps the team win?
If that’s the case I suggest you haven’t been on the inside of footy clubs much. These guys are competitive by nature and want to win.
There is a lot of angst on here about where Dawson plays - if he felt passionately that he should be further up the ground for the best outcome for the team that would absolutely be taken into account.
It will be interesting to see if he moves in the early part of the year to a more permanent wing/mid role. That would suggest the frustration on here has been correct.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Footy season or calendar year?
Doubt he is sacked during the season, but depending on how we go it's a possibility he isn't around for next season.
Or Nicks is ultra conservative and is more interested in reducing the size of the loss than going for the win. Or Nicks could just be an idiot.I agree that Dawson wouldn’t be able to dictate - but you would have to think if he genuinely believes it’s not the most effective spot for him to play he would have had the discussion. So Nicks has either given him reasons that he has got behind or we will see a change early in the year once the side settles down
As a number of people have observed - we have plenty of defenders fighting for a spot. If they think those guys are up to it then there would be no reason to hold Dawson back there, unless that is seen as his most valuable spot in this squad
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Or Nicks is ultra conservative and is more interested in reducing the size of the loss than going for the win. Or Nicks could just be an idiot.
If we kick more goals we also mean we are closer to a win, plus it’s a more entertaining game to watch.Both quite possible - and I have no doubt it is about reducing the size of the loss, which by definition means the team is closer to a win
He may well be a poor coach as well - but as pretty much all of us have commented he hasn’t had great cattle to work with. We won’t know for sure if he can’t coach until mid next year
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I'm of the opposite view. I reckon only a really bad start sees him gone and replaced by Burns. If we have an evenly bad year, I see him coaching into 2024.
If we kick more goals we also mean we are closer to a win, plus it’s a more entertaining game to watch.
I don’t think too many coaches worry about the entertainment aspect of the game
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Coach might not, but crowds are important to the clubYes more attacking means more goals and that tends to be the end stage of a rebuild - we aren’t there yet but hopefully take another step this year
I don’t think too many coaches worry about the entertainment aspect of the game
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
How bad is really bad?
I think they hold on until the end of year even if they’ve put a line through his name.
Only way they get rid of him early is if we’re in spoon contention
Yeah, that would be disastrous and there’s no excuse for that. It will take something like that to move on him during the year. At the end of the year if we win only say 5 games I can see they move him on then.2-10, something like that.
One thing I liked about Walsh. He wanted there to be a bit of that entertainment factor about a game still. Winning was still most important, but he wasn't going to lock a game down and turn it into a defensive bore. Like the Freo game where he let Danger and Fyfe go head to head when people were telling him to tag because he knew it'd be a great battle to watch as a fan.Yes more attacking means more goals and that tends to be the end stage of a rebuild - we aren’t there yet but hopefully take another step this year
I don’t think too many coaches worry about the entertainment aspect of the game
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yeah that would do it2-10, something like that.