Player Watch Jordan Dawson - Our New Captain!

[GROTTO]

Hello mate. Port are able to offer a better salary with Bloods supplement and a more acceptable trade than the Crows are offering.

By way of background the four Northern Clubs are increasingly refusing to be used as talent humidicribs. Lines have been drawn in the sand against Adelaide and a few Vic Clubs.

You should be banned not for posting on here or posting something ridiculous.

But for being stupid.

 

[Stiffy_18]

Loving this deal for us on a number of fronts.

1. We get a future 1st which adds to the currency for next year for uncontracted Suns onslaught
2. It sticks up the middle finger at Swans and their demands. Now there is no pick 23 or 44 to use this year and we sure as hell are not trading pick 4 and unlikely to trade Melbourne's or our future 1st.

PSD here we come.

 

[Scorpus]

Couple of ways it could go now all up

Out: 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, 33 - giving up Melbourne 2022 1st to Sydney

Out: 2022 2nd, 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, Melbourne 2022 1st - giving up future 2nd and 33 to Sydney

Those deals look pretty good if we don't offer anything more

(I'm not counting the 4th rounders we lost given we wouldn't have used them)

 

[GROTTO]

Yep and speculative small forwards are a dime a dozen and still available at late picks.

Dump Rowe, we tried and failed with him, and give another one a go.

Was there talk of us looking at CC's brother?

 

[FR0GGY]

Sydney can still ask for future 1st.

I’m not sure if we can trade that now we’ve traded a future 4th?

 

[Scorpus]

I’m not sure if we can trade that now we’ve traded a future 4th?

That's right. We cannot (though we can if we get a 2022 4th back)

 

[GROTTO]

I’m not sure if we can trade that now we’ve traded a future 4th?

I thought it was just future 1sts thats the main issue.

Then again, Geelong were able to do anything they wanted as it was part of the Victorian fairytale to get Danger to them.

 

[GROTTO]

That's right. We cannot (though we can if we get a 2022 4th back)

Does it have to be a 4th? Can it be a 5th or any other pick?

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Loving the thought process behind this 4 team deal. Stash up for picks next year

Presuming we've done this to keep MELB's 2022 1st ......or will that pick be used for Dawson ?

 

[Vhaluus]

Couple of ways it could go now all up

Out: 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, 33 - giving up Melbourne 2022 1st to Sydney

Out: 2022 2nd, 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, Melbourne 2022 1st - giving up future 2nd and 33 to Sydney

Those deals look pretty good if we don't offer anything more

I'd be happy with either of those deals actually

 

[FR0GGY]

I thought it was just future 1sts thats the main issue.

Then again, Geelong were able to do anything they wanted as it was part of the Victorian fairytale to get Danger to them.

Yeah if you trade a 1st you can’t do others, thought it was the same in reverse.
Geelong was different, I think originally you had to use one first rd pick in a rolling 4 years (unless geelong)

 

[blitzen666]

Lukosius PSD next year?

 

[SuperBashBros]

I think the offer to Sydney is now going to be Melbs 2022 1st take it or leave it.

They will want our pick 33 this year but thats essentially a mid 2nd rounder. They're not getting a first AND second for Dawson.

Hamish should be able to find a gem at pick 33 (which will slide down hopefully). Great trade by Reidy & crew.

 

[Murray2503]

Couple of ways it could go now all up

Out: 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, 33 - giving up Melbourne 2022 1st to Sydney

Out: 2022 2nd, 23, 37, 44
In: Dawson, Melbourne 2022 1st - giving up future 2nd and 33 to Sydney

Those deals look pretty good if we don't offer anything more

(I'm not counting the 4th rounders we lost given we wouldn't have used them)

First option looks good for all parties. Sydney should be happy with Melbourne 2022 1st (15-18).

 

[Jirkago75]

We have same with Keays, Davis, etc. Once you've been delisted, if you're out of contract you are a FA.

Does it work for Keays though because we never delisted him and he has changed clubs?? It should only apply if they stay at the same club I think

 

[conVINCEd]

Does it work for Keays though because we never delisted him and he has changed clubs?? It should only apply if they stay at the same club I think

Read dogs’ post again. He’s right.

 

[relapse]

First option looks good for all parties. Sydney should be happy with Melbourne 2022 1st (15-18).

At worst we'll most probably give Sydney Pick 33 and Melbourne 2022 future 1st.

33+18 (if Melb win the flag in 2022) equates to Pick 9

If that ends up happening then we would have traded 23, 37 and 43 for Dawson.

 

[Golumless]

Does it work for Keays though because we never delisted him and he has changed clubs?? It should only apply if they stay at the same club I think

Yup, he's been delisted at a football club before, so he's an FA for life.

 

[FR0GGY]

At worst we'll most probably give Sydney Pick 33 and Melbourne 2022 future 1st.

And go in with 4 and 75?

 

[Crow till I die]

Lukosius PSD next year?

And with the Benny hill music going in the background get rankine with a future 3rd....Can you imagine the AFL.....they would want to kill us

 

[Scorpus]

At worst we'll most probably give Sydney Pick 33 and Melbourne 2022 future 1st.

33+18 equates to Pick 9

If that ends up happening then we would have traded 23, 37 and 43 for Dawson.

23, 37 and Jake Kelly

I don't think we'll do that without another pick coming back though

 

[Danger in Texas]

We might as well go target another "contracted" legitimate A grader if we're giving up anything even close to what Sydney want....Dawson's a nice get but no bloody way is he even close to a game breaker.

Never said he was a 'game-breaker' as such (although, given the opportunity, I believe he could be), but he's still our biggest target since Gibbs. That's not a question, he's a MUCH better player right now than Stengle/Frampton/Hately/Hinge were

 

[Crows I Am]

At worst we'll most probably give Sydney Pick 33 and Melbourne 2022 future 1st.

33+18 (at worst) equates to Pick 9

If that ends up happening then we would have traded 23, 37 and 43 for Dawson.

I don't think we will include 33, as then that basically gives us 1 pick in this draft. Unless we are looking at splitting pick 4

 

[Danger in Texas]

By the way what's happened since I went offline?

 

[Scorpus]

By the way what's happened since I went offline?

We're about to give up 23, 37 and Jake Kelly (44) for Melbourne's 2022 1st and pick 33