VerC
Debutant
- Aug 15, 2021
- 114
- 196
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I didn’t want him back then either. I feel the same about us getting Smith.I was right about Bruhn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I didn’t want him back then either. I feel the same about us getting Smith.I was right about Bruhn
Statistically this year Kennedy can do everything Atkins does but he takes significantly more marks, kicks, goals, gets more metres gained with the ball.I'd take Kennedy, especially if we give away our early picks for Smith.
Smith and Kennedy would walk into our midfield.
Even if Kennedy is slow, just play him as the inside mid, he will give us first use.
Because the AFL got the result they wanted.They showed the Daniher ‘mark’ in replay and the commentary team (and my eyes) thought it was a goal. I’m wondering why there has been nothing further said of it. At the very least there should be a please explain and a goal umpire dropped for not asking for a review.
They showed the Daniher ‘mark’ in replay and the commentary team (and my eyes) thought it was a goal. I’m wondering why there has been nothing further said of it. At the very least there should be a please explain and a goal umpire dropped for not asking for a review.
Josh "from maximising distance "Jenkins.I've always had a lot of time for JJ, and definitely did not call him a "goal square merchant spud" on more than 20 occasions.
That your eyes are not painted on.I was at the game so just wanted to confirm a few things
Isn't that in and of itself ironic? A little too ironic I really do thinkOne of the great musical trolls of all time. A song called ironic with no irony in it.
Not make excuses like you are and tell the players to cover the middle corridor. It's not a complicated game. The idea that Scott had no options is ridiculous.AND what would a great coach do about it mid game, with his best player unavailable, Danger sore ribs, and the rest off their games?
For those wondering, this is what Scott had to say about these issues in last night's press conference - he acknowledged the off field issues but downplayed the role they played last night & didn't want it reported as an excuse
Who’s that idiot Massola? Feels very Richmondy or Hawthorny.
Who’s that idiot Massola? Feels very Richmondy or Hawthorny.
There should always be an opportunity to review that’s why it’s there I would’ve thoughtDid they have the opportunity to review it though? It wasn't like the review when Bews touched it and the ball went back to the middle and they reviewed it during the stop in play - Daniher had played on afterwards. If it was found to have been a legitimate mark, it would've disadvantaged Brisbane as we would have been able to set up defensively.
Misrepresenting my post…Lack of respect for the opposition by many here.Of course we had a chance, but being at the G was certainly not a huge favour for us this year, as if to make up for our deficiencies. And it was not a foregone conclusion; close game. Many knew we would have the close prelim. But getting it done the way Lions did even after we took the late lead was a huge statement. Picking Lions after their win last week was based on them handling pressure and us not having had any for a month.
That's absurd. He's played 18 games off half back. I suppose he should be a champion A grader by now?Nope, he is a total liability. If he is in the midfield next year we are cooked.
Geez....harsh. His VFL form was pretty bloody good.Because his VFL form has never justified playing, and more often than not when he is in matches we are basically playing a man down.
Its staggering games are being pumped into him when he quite frankly hasn't earned his spot and while he shows glimpses people forget it was mistakes against Papley that lead to him getting Sydney over us, and it was trying a kick that wasn't on against GWS that lead to a Greene smother and goal that sunk us at home.
Right now his worst games severely outnumber his good games, and it would be crazy to suggest his output tonight would have been more than someone like a Tuohy or even an SDK. Hell tonight I would have rathered given the game time to Clark if you want to pump finals into someone to speed up development.