RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
They do if we tell one or two players they will be dropped down to the rookie list. We did it with Williams, as well as a few others over the last 4 or 5 years. Grundy and Woodcock spring to mind straight away.
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25
- Thread starter Long live PAFC
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I'm like U can.. I'm not.
Butters and Pepper
Club Legend
- Sep 18, 2020
- 1,396
- 2,796
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
He gets you to the other side.
It would be unfair to drop Narkle as he hardly get any opportunity to play at senior level . He definitely deserve another year .
- Feb 7, 2014
- 14,970
- 30,598
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC , Boston Red Sox/celtics
Go after spp mate shai bolton being wasted at Richmond
- Feb 7, 2014
- 14,970
- 30,598
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC , Boston Red Sox/celtics
Mcntee cough cough
Look at the posting history.
Avs is either a relative of Narkle or Narkle himself.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Mar 26, 2007
- 21,588
- 46,592
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Anaheim Ducks, White Sox
This is just not true. Marshall has shown a heck of a lot more than McCallum. McCallum has been far below in performance. McCallum is far more likely to be delisted.
Portology
Premium Platinum
Veteran
10k Posts
Port Adelaide - Allir Allir Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Kane Farrell Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Connor Rozee Player Sponsor 2020
Port Adelaide - Zak Butters 2019 Player Sponsor
Port Adelaide - Jack Watts Player Sponsor 2018
Port Adelaide - Jesse Palmer Player Sponsor 2017
Even as depth options you'd think Narkle, who gets more of the footy and generally uses it well, ought to be ahead of Mcentee. Weird but Narkle looks like he has some burst in the first few steps but no top speed at all.
There is fair few support for Narkle on this forum .
- Nov 25, 2019
- 5,320
- 10,772
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
The first part is objective truth. They took McCallum in the second round and Marshall was the last pick in the draft. They probably had McCallum 10-20 spots higher in their big board.
McCallum is a bit of a Cam O'Shea in that he does three good things and then 3 absolute clangers but it is still more than Marshall has shown. I would go as far to say I haven't seen Marshall show any AFL traits at all other than the fact he is tall.
Can you identify anything that he does well?
He has definitely been superceded by Walsh in 3 games.
I'd be shocked if McCallum was delisted over Marshall. Firstly in the sense that I just think McCallum is better. Secondly because Hinkley has never held on to these sorts of players very long - Riley Grundy being a good example.
Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 83,062
- 205,492
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Moderator
- #767
We will hold on to McCallum at least until the Tassie team comes in.
With Marshall, tall defenders have enormous premium in the AFL these days, we would be crazy to delist a 200cm development project with his athletic ability.
With Marshall, tall defenders have enormous premium in the AFL these days, we would be crazy to delist a 200cm development project with his athletic ability.
avs
He’s averaged 1.5 g and 16.5 in 2 games this season (not 2g and 20d)
Last year he averaged 0.6 goals and 21.3d in 7 games.
What else does he need to do?
Stay on the park for starters.
Find an actual position. He’s not a forward at sanfl level, he’s not a mid at afl level. What is he?
He’s a list clogger, and holding onto him for an extra few years will accomplish exactly zero.
He’s averaged 1.5 g and 16.5 in 2 games this season (not 2g and 20d)
Last year he averaged 0.6 goals and 21.3d in 7 games.
What else does he need to do?
Stay on the park for starters.
Find an actual position. He’s not a forward at sanfl level, he’s not a mid at afl level. What is he?
He’s a list clogger, and holding onto him for an extra few years will accomplish exactly zero.
- Mar 26, 2007
- 21,588
- 46,592
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Anaheim Ducks, White Sox
McCallum has been so bad, in his role, that I personally wouldn't have been surprised if he was delisted last year. He was a huge drafting blunder that's for sure, a reach gone wrong, should've been a rookie at best. Marshall has shown when surrounded by some assistance, he was more than capable of playing a tall defender role and rebounding off. He has some great size, length and speed. McCallum is undersided, offers zero defensively, offers zero offensively, and doesn't suit any need. Some of the bags he had kicked on him last year, despite the far better fortunes of the team had him literally as the main target for the opposition to play through.
I presume you either haven't watched all of the SANFL games as I do, else you just have a very strange opinion and are the first person I've seen with any positivity on McCallum.
- Nov 25, 2019
- 5,320
- 10,772
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Show one time Marshall rebounded off his opponent lol.
Whatever dude, let's see what happens at the end of the year.
Yeah, not pressing but worth it.
A sliding doors I think about from time to time is that we would have won a flag in 2014 with Paul Chapman.
I don’t know whether he would come here, or even bother playing on outside Richmond, but Dusty for a year would be great for us and cover SPP as he returns from his ACL.
I don’t know whether he would come here, or even bother playing on outside Richmond, but Dusty for a year would be great for us and cover SPP as he returns from his ACL.
You’re both half right, Marshall and McCullum are both terrible, one will probably survive but it’s a flip of the coin.
