List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

Remove this Banner Ad

Did Kysaiah Pickett sit at the Port table? :p
 
Did Kysaiah Pickett sit at the Port table? :p
Really? Didn’t see it
 
On the flight over to Sydney last week Sue Rozee was sitting next to one of the Directors partners. She has quite the loud mouth and was ranting on about how Narkle and his partner were stressed out because they didn't know if he would get a contract and that it wasn't fair on the families. Sue then leans two seats over to the Director and says "you're on the Board, put in a good word for Narkle to give him a new deal."

Pretty sure Narkle is a watch and hold right now though.
I have mixed feelings about Narkle. Ultimately he doesn't have a weapon but he's good enough to be in the player 24-30 category. I'm sure he goes very well in the SANFL. There are a bunch of players who should be delisted before Narkle. However its Narkle who is out of contact and his fate might be sealed by how many father/son picks we want and players we recruit in because for every player we bring in, one must be delisted and they have to be out of contract.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So here is the big question about delistings - how many father/sons or NGA player are going to get listed.

It sounds like Francou is the least likely yet to me he is the type of player that Carr might like

I don't watch under 18's

Burgoyne
Montgomery
Barrett
Francou

Yay or Nay?
 
I've taken a few days to think since I have a lot of time now for obvious reasons but do you guys reckon Port should simply reset and suffer a few years of pain to regenerate this average list because at this rate, we're heading towards no man's land with the amount of B and C grade players.

Our talented players are hard carrying this team and sometimes to the detriment of the list's true value in my opinion. We're not good enough to win a flag with this list but we are not bad enough to bottom out. Something has to give. If Port are heading towards this direction, Ken and a few other coaches must go.

There is no doubt that we have to start trimming off players who have no value in bringing us a flag e.g. Dixon, McEntee etc. and unfortunately we have to give up good players to acquire talent. Pains me to say that losing Houston might be more beneficial to Port in the long run even if I don't want to lose him since he is our best kick and those skillsets don't grow on trees but the harsh reality is that Port needs talent in and with him wanting to go home despite insisting he is staying, it's probably in Port's best interest to trade him.
 
So here is the big question about delistings - how many father/sons or NGA player are going to get listed.

It sounds like Francou is the least likely yet to me he is the type of player that Carr might like

I don't watch under 18's

Burgoyne
Montgomery
Barrett
Francou

Yay or Nay?
If it were totally up to me, I'd draft all 4. All 4 would've been drafted for sure in last year's draft imo.

My predictions are that (no Intel just based on what I've read)

Perryman goes to Pies
Cumming goes to Crows
Richards stays at Collingwood
We pay overs for Lukosius because we need to trade someone in

Outgoings (either retirement/trade/delist)
Dixon
McKenzie
Clurey
Soldo
Williams*
Houston
McEntee
FEvans*
McCallum
Kyle Marshall (dependent on how many picks we have)

*These are reliant on Perryman and Richards. If we get Perryman, Williams will be traded/delisted. If we get Richards, FEvans will be traded/delisted.

As much as people keep banging on about 2 firsts for Houston, I actually think we might be in a much better position if we got a top 10 pick plus 2 early - mid 2nd rounders. Gives us more flexibility and talent imo.
 
If it were totally up to me, I'd draft all 4. All 4 would've been drafted for sure in last year's draft imo.

My predictions are that (no Intel just based on what I've read)

Perryman goes to Pies
Cumming goes to Crows
Richards stays at Collingwood
We pay overs for Lukosius because we need to trade someone in

Outgoings (either retirement/trade/delist)
Dixon
McKenzie
Clurey
Soldo
Williams*
Houston
McEntee
FEvans*
McCallum
Kyle Marshall (dependent on how many picks we have)

*These are reliant on Perryman and Richards. If we get Perryman, Williams will be traded/delisted. If we get Richards, FEvans will be traded/delisted.

As much as people keep banging on about 2 firsts for Houston, I actually think we might be in a much better position if we got a top 10 pick plus 2 early - mid 2nd rounders. Gives us more flexibility and talent imo.
Williams (R) and McEntee are contracted till the end of 2025. They cant be traded cause no one wants them.
 
Williams (R) and McEntee are contracted till the end of 2025. They cant be traded cause no one wants them.
McEntee can be delisted as long as his contract is paid out and Williams can be too. But there's a little bit of interest in Williams. McEntee is also a rookie btw
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So here is the big question about delistings - how many father/sons or NGA player are going to get listed.

It sounds like Francou is the least likely yet to me he is the type of player that Carr might like

I don't watch under 18's

Burgoyne
Montgomery
Barrett
Francou

Yay or Nay?

Rome, Barrett and Montgomery. Think Barrett the only one of any interest in the main draft maybe late 2nd or likely 3rd round with Rome and Montgomery nothing rookie picks.

Francou of interest but maybe takes the Evans path.
 
Soldo is contracted until the end of 2025 so if he cannot get a regular game next year he will walk anyway. We might as well get something while we have some bargaining power. Soldo is 28 and has played 65 games across 7 seasons so he is not exactly hot property. He is probably only a depth player where ever he goes. If we can jag a third round pick for him or use him as part of a trade we will have done well.

If we let Soldo go we will need to cover the ruck depth so we could rookie list an experienced ruckman from one of the minor leagues. I am not sure if Harry Boyd who won the 2024 Magarey Medal would fit the bill? The alternative is to look at AFL trades or the National Draft. The problem with drafting an 18 year old is the wait time while the kid develops. It has taken Visentini three years to get to the stage where he is almost ready for AFL football.
 
Rome, Barrett and Montgomery. Think Barrett the only one of any interest in the main draft maybe late 2nd or likely 3rd round with Rome and Montgomery nothing rookie picks.

Francou of interest but maybe takes the Evans path.
I like the idea but just think a F/S prospect would be rookied and then put on the list rather than MSD cause I don't think you can have first rights on F/S pick in MSD
 
With Dixon finished, an obvious cloud over Marshall, and Lord struggling it would in my opinion be foolhardy of the club to give Scully the lemonade and sars.

Tall forwards are historically the hardest to find, he can take a mark, is usually a very reliable kick and it would be extremely difficult to be an effective forward in the worst Maggie's team in over 100 years and which could have struggled to get the ball inside the forward 50 with any method if they were playing against the Kanmantoo magoos!
 
Last edited:
So here is the big question about delistings - how many father/sons or NGA player are going to get listed.

It sounds like Francou is the least likely yet to me he is the type of player that Carr might like

I don't watch under 18's

Burgoyne
Montgomery
Barrett
Francou

Yay or Nay?
Barrett the most likely, pending when/if bid comes in, Montgomery then Burgoyne probably rookie draft and still likely, Francou was a LONG way back but I would rather have a father son on the list than some mercenary from the Falcons or Sturt.

I would love all 4 on the list, think we will have 2 definitely, wouldn’t be surprised with 3.
 
Hinkley and Davies shouldn't be involved in list management decisions given the doubts on their respective futures.
 
With Dixon finished, an obvious cloud over Marshall, and Lord struggling it would in my opinion be foolhardy of the club to give Scully the lemonade and sars.

Tall forwards are historically the hardest to find, he can take a mark, is usually a very reliable kick and it would be extremely difficult to be an effective forward in the worst Maggie's team in over 100 years, which could have struggled to get the ball inside the forward 50 with any method if they were playing against the Kanmantoo magoos!
Absolutely, but nothing would surprise me under this regime! The no DH policy has returned so much success…
 
Hinkley and Davies shouldn't be involved in list management decisions given the doubts on their respective futures.
But then we would be leaving it to Cornes, Lobbe and Hartlett, who are all compromised themselves…

I would have Carr, Cripps and Goldsack, maybe Tredrea as a ‘director’.
 
I feel like Boak would've been told by now that he's going to be phased out, and not a priority for selection next year, so if he's happy to stay knowing he could play a bunch of SANFL then he can stay.

In a perfect world personally I think being able to keep that calibre of player as depth and around for quality training partner, and development assistance would be great, but it isn't typically the type of thing we see. Much better having him around than Pick 435
 
McEntee can be delisted as long as his contract is paid out and Williams can be too. But there's a little bit of interest in Williams. McEntee is also a rookie btw
You need a reality check, you do not pay out players to de-list 'em; alas, we are stuck with Jed for next year
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top