Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 17

[Waspy79]

The Butters decision was wrong. The application of high impact was incorrect. With all due respect a severe impact grading is reserved for incidents like Bugg and Gaff. The Dangerfield bump will not be graded severe impact and I’m prepared to put money on the line should you wish to

 

[PJ Power]

I think it’s a clear-cut two weeker

 

[Waspy79]

I think it’s a clear-cut two weeker

Agree

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

Puts into perspective how good Sydney's kids were last night.

 

[OneGreatClub]

Geez how many excuses for GoldenDanger.
How many times do they have to bring the ‘no malice’ into it. ****ing Vic centric commentators

 

[edgie]

Who cares, its Dangerfield, I'm over hearing about him, be it good or bad news.

He certainly wouldn't mind the 'no publicity is bad publicity' theory.

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

The Butters decision was wrong. The application of high impact was incorrect. With all due respect a severe impact grading is reserved for incidents like Bugg and Gaff. The Dangerfield bump will not be graded severe impact and I’m prepared to put money on the line should you wish to

If it was wrong, why didn't we appeal it?

 

[Waspy79]

If it was wrong, why didn't we appeal it?

Because he wasn’t going to miss finals football.

 

[Grave Danger]

Jack Sinclair

35

Jack Sinclair

Age

29

Ht

181cm

Wt

82kg

Pos.

D/M

Career

Season

Last 5

D

16.5

4star

K

8.1

3star

HB

8.4

5star

M

3.1

3star

T

3.2

5star

MG

235.0

4star

D

15.0

4star

K

10.0

4star

HB

5.0

3star

M

4.0

4star

T

2.0

3star

MG

376.0

5star

D

12.0

3star

K

4.2

2star

HB

7.8

5star

M

1.6

2star

T

2.0

4star

MG

138.2

3star

needs to pull his finger out...

 

[finbarr]

Did something i rarely do, jumped on for a look at the AFL Facebook report of our game. Crows fans very chirpy after knocking off the Geelong Resthaven 18 yesterday.

 

[Garibaldi Red]

Straight to the tribunal for Danger

 

[malcheski]

The Butters decision was wrong. The application of high impact was incorrect. With all due respect a severe impact grading is reserved for incidents like Bugg and Gaff. The Dangerfield bump will not be graded severe impact and I’m prepared to put money on the line should you wish to

Gee you would have lost a bit of money. Straight to the tribunal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Waspy79]

Gee you would have lost a bit of money. Straight to the tribunal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had $100 on a Cats / Lions multi this week too!

That’s another terrible decision by Christian.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

This Dangerflog case is actually a real opportunity for them to make a statement that the days of bias are over. Would be a great start to the year for the tribunal.

 

[finbarr]

AFL-360 tomorrow night.

30 minutes discussing Dangerfield bump.
15 Minutes discussing Bulldogs win.
5 minutes discussing "Are the Hawks back?"
10 minutes discussing "plucky Crows".

*Roll credits^

 

[raman]

AFL-360 tomorrow night.

30 minutes discussing Dangerfield bump.
15 Minutes discussing Bulldogs win.
5 minutes discussing "Are the Hawks back?"
10 minutes discussing "plucky Crows".

*Roll credits^

You didn't leave room for 25 minutes of ads.

 

[finbarr]

You didn't leave room for 25 minutes of ads.

Ok, i''ll allow for 15 minutes. The hawks and Crows bits to come out.

*roll credits*

 

[StuMan]

GWS have no sponsor on the back of their jumper. Strange to see in the modern era.

 

[afl2004]

Saints missing half there team and gws at home are still losing lol

Sack Cameron

 

[finbarr]

Who cares, its Dangerfield, I'm over hearing about him, be it good or bad news.

He certainly wouldn't mind the 'no publicity is bad publicity' theory.

Nah, Dangerfield is definitely a good publicity only type of guy. His public image has been very carefully crafted to set him up for a major job in the corporation past football.

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

For those who watch first to 100 pts wins.

 

[Garibaldi Red]

Saints missing half there team and gws at home are still losing lol

Sack Cameron

now lead by 3 pts and at the same time lead the free kick count 25-12

 

[Doctor Feel]

Whoa that goal lol

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

Because he wasn’t going to miss finals football.

Or we accepted it was correct. Dangerfield bump has been assessed as Severe Impact.

No Cookies | Herald Sun

No Cookies

www.heraldsun.com.au

Patrick Dangerfield will almost certainly miss key games against Brisbane, Hawthorn and Melbourne after being referred straight to the tribunal for his hit on former housemate Jake Kelly.

Dangerfield was on Sunday handed a Monday night tribunal date after MRO boss Michael Christian assessed the intentional head clash as a careless hit of severe force.

The Herald Sun revealed on Sunday that Kelly’s heavy concussion and broken nose were certain to see the force elevated from high to severe.

The tribunal can make its own judgment on punishment but the base suspension for a careless-severe force hit to the head is three or more weeks.

Even if Geelong successfully argued to downgrade the hit from severe to medium Dangerfield would still miss two weeks.

Match Review: Dangerfield verdict is in, Daniher charged

The Match Review has completed its review from Saturday's matches

www.afl.com.au

Patrick Dangerfield, Geelong Cats, has been charged with Engaging in Rough Conduct against Jake Kelly, Adelaide Crows, during the second quarter of the Round One match between the Adelaide Crows and Geelong Cats, played at Adelaide Oval on Saturday March 20.

In summary, he has been referred directly to the Tribunal .......

Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Careless Conduct, Severe Impact and High Contact. The incident was classified as a direct referral to the Tribunal and the player cannot accept an early plea.

 

[Power Raid]

saints finishing stronger