philreich
Premium Platinum
- Mar 2, 2014
- 64,713
- 167,852
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Should be a tight one tonight - surely it's Fagan's last game in charge if the Lions lose.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Party Pete probably finds interesting substances at those eastern suburbs parties, that fires him up.Ladhams bemuses me. I always expected goofy acts from him on or off field, but harmless and even funny goofy. Suddenly now his goofy acts are becoming increasingly aggressive, hitting Wines and even the DBJ throw down. Now this late hit on Woewodin. Wonder what's going on in the wonderland that is Pistol Pete's brain?
Nah Fagan is safe. He is contracted to end of 2023. AFL's 100% soft cap tax doing the job of keeping coaches in their jobs.Should be a tight one tonight - surely it's Fagan's last game in charge if the Lions lose.
And North are the only poor club to understand this so they had noble on a no contractNah Fagan is safe. He is contracted to end of 2023. AFL's 100% soft cap tax doing the job of keeping coaches in their jobs.
Nah Fagan is safe. He is contracted to end of 2023. AFL's 100% soft cap tax doing the job of keeping coaches in their jobs.
I guess the important question here is What do Collingwood think?
Also "At loggerheads" implies an equitable power balance. If the AFL says no, there are no loggerheads
loggerhead (n.)
1580s, "stupid person, blockhead, dunce, numbskull," perhaps from dialectal logger "heavy block of wood" + head (n.). Later it meant a type of thick-headed iron tool (1680s), a type of cannon shot, a post in the stern of a whale-boat, and a type of turtle (1650s).
I guess the important question here is What do Collingwood think?
Also "At loggerheads" implies an equitable power balance. If the AFL says no, there are no loggerheads
loggerhead (n.)
1580s, "stupid person, blockhead, dunce, numbskull," perhaps from dialectal logger "heavy block of wood" + head (n.). Later it meant a type of thick-headed iron tool (1680s), a type of cannon shot, a post in the stern of a whale-boat, and a type of turtle (1650s).
I guess the important question here is What do Collingwood think?
Also "At loggerheads" implies an equitable power balance. If the AFL says no, there are no loggerheads
loggerhead (n.)
1580s, "stupid person, blockhead, dunce, numbskull," perhaps from dialectal logger "heavy block of wood" + head (n.). Later it meant a type of thick-headed iron tool (1680s), a type of cannon shot, a post in the stern of a whale-boat, and a type of turtle (1650s).
They got to at least pretend there’s some resistanceSurely a cup of coffee or two with Gil will bring the AFL to their senses and realise Clarko is again right.
Agreed, but we may have to re-define 'some resistance'.They got to at least pretend there’s some resistance
Agreed, but we may have to re-define 'some resistance'.
At home Brissy should win but looking at the betting Richmond are favourites.Should be a tight one tonight - surely it's Fagan's last game in charge if the Lions lose.
Everyone's got to watch out for port, no one will want to play them!Oh boy, its the AFL finals
Imagine if they do get rolled. The AFL putting the handbrake on clubs just because
Oh boy, its the AFL finals
Who's playing?