Preview R1: Changes for 2025

Of the players at the fringes or who are getting on a bit, who will get a gig in Round 1?

  • Chayce Jones

  • Sam Berry

  • Lachlan Murphy

  • Luke Pedlar

  • Brayden Cook

  • Zac Taylor

  • Oscar Ryan

  • Harry Schoenberg

  • Luke Nankervis

  • Rory Laird

  • Wayne Milera

  • Billy Dowling

  • Brodie Smith

  • Lachlan Sholl

  • Hugh Bond


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Funny, all you seem to do is post rubbish and then you get defensive when it's called out.

Maybe the internet isn't for you
Maybe Pedlar not currently being part of our best side isn’t rubbish but merely an opinion, and one that is shared by many others. Maybe the internet doesn’t need to be about abusing people for having a difference of opinion. But hey, go for it, other internet stranger, if that’s how you get your kicks.
 
Pedlar 110% needs a big off-season to start the year in the 23. Same with Milera

As it stands, these are the players that are automatically ahead of each of them:
Pedlar: Rachele, Rankine, Keays, ANB
Milera: Hinge, Cumming, Michalanney, Nankervis

If it was up to me Milera would be ahead of Laird, but I don’t see the coaching staff thinking the same
 
Thank you for making this abusive and personal. Have you considered that everything wrong in your life is of your own making, unhappy internet stranger?

I look forward to your explanation on how that was abusive and personal.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I like some people's confidence that Murphy won't be selected. We all now that, up until now, he was an automatic selection along with Laird and Crouch. The new players should clearly replace all three but I think Nicks will find it hard to let them go, especially in one fell swoop.
I can live with Crouch being retained if he plays as well as he did when he came back into the side last year. He has a point of difference that I'd like to see in action with Draper and Peatling on the outside.
I think that Murphy is the most vulnerable and he is dispensable, and also easiest to cut, because he is not a club champion or match winner.
But ..... can you actually see Laird, our all-Australian and three time club champion, not being selected, at east at the start of the year? He absolutely deserves to be omitted, especially after some of those obvious soft plays widely circulated from last season, not to mention his lack of leadership in the Rachele issue. And his kicking has been terrible for years, only hidden by being an attacking defender. I know the club did it with club champion and all-Australian Scott Thompson but that was a different time with a different coach.
Look out for at least two of these chaps being in the selection conversation - like it or not.
 
Subtract out Tex from our list, average age drops by almost a year, avg games drop by 10.

Subtract out smith, do.the same again.

Basically we're Tex and Smith off being north and Richmond.
What if you drop all the clubs two oldest players?
 
New numbers confirmed:

Nick Murray - 9

Tyler Welsh - 17

James Peatling - 25

Alex Neal-Bullen 28

Sid Draper - 34

Isaac Cumming - 44
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nick Murray to be our big bodied mid?
Cumming to 44 is a bit odd.
Hopefully Draper moves into number 4 soon.
Good to see the Bruce Lindner, Tony Hall number going back to a bigger guy...

(though Tony Hall is actually the same height as Rory Sloane...)
 
If the decision is Laird or Milera at half back I'm picking Milera.
Laird has never been a half back. He was a back pocket when he played in the defence. Milera should have been traded years ago. He will be delisted when ooc.
 
Subtract out Tex from our list, average age drops by almost a year, avg games drop by 10.

Subtract out smith, do.the same again.

Basically we're Tex and Smith off being north and Richmond.

In terms of average age, if you do that for every other team, about the same thing happens. The average age of each teams oldest 2 players is 33.25 years, ours is 33.5 years, which makes us equal 7th and 8th with hawks. Below us are clubs 9-12 averaging half a year less. What's actually important isn't the raw numbers, it's reliance on the older players. Our 3 oldest, Laird is 3rd, probably won't contribute a whole lot more to our best 23 than their replacements. Tex might if he's physically good to go and we don't wear him out, but Smith shouldn't be auto selected anymore and Laird wouldn't be too far ahead of next man up.
 
What if you drop all the clubs two oldest players?

Just to follow up on my other post, as I forgot to include Freo. Our oldest 2 players is equal 7th-9th with Freo and Hawks at 33.5 years old average. Places 10-13 average 33 years. If we removed the 2 oldest players from every club, we would be 9th youngest, 0.1 year younger than Suns and 0.1 year older than Port. There would be 6 clubs within 0.3 of a year above and below us, Carlton 6th at 24.6, us 9th at 24.3 and Freo 12th at 24.0.

Really a kind of nothing analysis. I'm surprised it got likes, I'd have thought them harder to come across.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview R1: Changes for 2025

Back
Top