Preview Richmond vs Collingwood: Round Two

[TimothyJ23]

Lol you Pies fans are so stupid. We just did what we had too yesterday and did it easily. What would we have to fear? Another 6 goal win? Deary me

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

 

[Bazzar]

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

Can you post the 8 best from the 22, then show us the 8 from yesterday that will be dropped. Just curious

 

[rhys_22]

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

What else would you expect from a tiger supporter?

 

[TiggyTig]

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

Just tried to average the two wins this year for you. I typically judge the end score for best results. You were actually level with us at the first bounce too well done

 

[Bazzar]

What else would you expect from a tiger supporter?

Can you name the 8 that go out to bring in the 8 who are currently injured?

 

[No SPIN]

Lol you Pies fans are so stupid. We just did what we had too yesterday and did it easily. What would we have to fear? Another 6 goal win? Deary me

All good mate - a little banter and then you have to start the abuse.
You’re to precious.
Chill out.

 

[TiggyTig]

All good mate - a little banter and then you have to start the abuse.
You’re to precious.
Chill out.

Sorry fella was just continuing the banter didn’t mean to upset you, I guess that would make you the precious one?

 

[HTT]

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

Idled along for 3 quarters, then went whack. Only took us 5min in the end. Collingwood isn’t the first team this year to be within striking distance at 3QT - hell carlton in R1 hit the front at one stage in the last.

 

[captain blood 17]

Was on a ban because too many pea heart tigers supporters reported me actually

Or conveniently got yourself carded so you could disappear when the heat was on after your 6th loss in 7 games happened? Was very disappointed to be honest.
Anyway, no doubt the 2nd best team in the comp will have no issues handling the swans next weekend. Have a good week. I know i will.


Sent from my iPad using righteous Bhodi manpower

 

[TimothyJ23]

Can you name the 8 that go out to bring in the 8 who are currently injured?

Jamie Elliott
James Aish
Tyson Goldsack
Ben Reid
Adam Treloar
Lynden Dunn
Jordan De Goey
(then add Scharenberg & Howe during the game, plus other injured players on our list like Wells, Broomhead, Appleby, Kirby who are all there and abouts the fringe of the squad)

I'm not going to pretend to know how Bucks would re-arrange the side, I can fairly easily see that you'd probably take Murray, Mayne, Brown and Daicos out straight away. Greenwood maybe too.

Either way, trying to tell us we don't have injuries to a disproportionate number of top-line talent compared to other clubs in the eight is utterly ridiculous. It's not an excuse - we weren't good enough on Saturday and Richmond took advantage of what was in front of them and did their job.

I think the point is that if Collingwood get back most of the guys listed above, things would be very different (read: much closer) in a finals scenario.

Idled along for 3 quarters, then went whack. Only took us 5min in the end. Collingwood isn’t the first team this year to be within striking distance at 3QT - hell carlton in R1 hit the front at one stage in the last.

Did all those other teams lose two key backs and rely on a two-man bench rotation for half the game? As I said, you can only play what's in front of you but if Collingwood have a full 22 I don't think the margin blows out how it did.

 

[TimothyJ23]

If you bring back those hacks and drop your better performing players then all teams not just Richmond from the top 8 would dine out on Collingwood, those players make you look slow as snails.

LOL

Jordan De Goey a hack?
Adam Treloar a hack?

Can you try actually discussing footy instead of pointless rubbish trolling?

 

[Bazzar]

Jamie Elliott
James Aish
Tyson Goldsack
Ben Reid
Adam Treloar
Lynden Dunn
Jordan De Goey
(then add Scharenberg & Howe during the game, plus other injured players on our list like Wells, Broomhead, Appleby, Kirby who are all there and abouts the fringe of the squad)

I'm not going to pretend to know how Bucks would re-arrange the side, I can fairly easily see that you'd probably take Murray, Mayne, Brown and Daicos out straight away. Greenwood maybe too.

Either way, trying to tell us we don't have injuries to a disproportionate number of top-line talent compared to other clubs in the eight is utterly ridiculous. It's not an excuse - we weren't good enough on Saturday and Richmond took advantage of what was in front of them and did their job.

I think the point is that if Collingwood get back most of the guys listed above, things would be very different (read: much closer) in a finals scenario.

Did all those other teams lose two key backs and rely on a two-man bench rotation for half the game? As I said, you can only play what's in front of you but if Collingwood have a full 22 I don't think the margin blows out how it did.

We all know who's injured, but who would you take out of Saturdays side to replace them.

 

[SuperSub17]

If you bring back those hacks and drop your better performing players then all teams not just Richmond from the top 8 would dine out on Collingwood, those players make you look slow as snails.

Thanks for confirming you have absolutely zero clue.

 

[Bazzar]

Did all those other teams lose two key backs and rely on a two-man bench rotation for half the game? As I said, you can only play what's in front of you but if Collingwood have a full 22 I don't think the margin blows out how it did.

We lost Jack Reiwoldt 4 minutes in, and then Houli 6 minutes later against the Saints resulting in 2 rotations for the entire game and still won .
Also lost Conca 7 minutes into the Swans game resulting in 3 rotations for the entire game and still won

 

[TimothyJ23]

We all know who's injured, but who would you take out of Saturdays side to replace them.

If you bothered to read the post you'd see I very clearly answered that

We lost Jack Reiwoldt 4 minutes in, and then Houli 6 minutes later against the Saints resulting in 2 rotations for the entire game and still won .

Relevance?

We were 3rd, already with 8 key players missing, playing the reigning premiers and comp leaders.

You were 1st, lost a couple of players early and were still easily good enough to beat.... 15th.

Not really what I'd call a solid comparison.

 

[sante]

How many times do we have to beat the Pies to shut them up?

 

[Bazzar]

Relevance?
We were 3rd, already with 8 key players missing, playing the reigning premiers and comp leaders.
You were 1st, lost a couple of players early and were still easily good enough to beat.... 15th.

Not really what I'd call a solid comparison.

So injuries are only relevant when playing a top 4 side? Is that why you cannot beat a side in the 8?

 

[TimothyJ23]

So injuries are only relevant when playing a top 4 side? Is that why you cannot beat a side in the 8?

Injuries are certainly more relevant when you're facing a higher quality team. How that's not basic knowledge in any sports fans' brain is beyond me.

And I could be wrong but Adelaide R4 and Melbourne R12 were both in the eight.

 

[Chief Ten Beers]

So injuries are only relevant when playing a top 4 side? Is that why you cannot beat a side in the 8?

Because Buckley dismantled a premiership side and doesn't have the personality to coach and bring out the best in his players.

That's the usual narrative, isn't it?

 

[TiggerMan22]

If you "did it easily" why were you only ahead by four points at the final change against a team missing 8 first-22 players and having lost a further two during the game, resulting in a two-man rotation?

I'm also interested as how how 28 points = 6 goals but I guess maths isn't a strong point?

Always the injuries.

What was your largest lead? How long were you in the lead for? Yes we did it easily.





As you can see, being close at 3 quarter time is no accomplishment. And Carlton actually had a lgood lead during the game, unlike the Pies.








But yeh congrats for being close at 3 quarter time. No team has done that before

 

[TiggerMan22]

We lost Jack Reiwoldt 4 minutes in, and then Houli 6 minutes later against the Saints resulting in 2 rotations for the entire game and still won .
Also lost Conca 7 minutes into the Swans game resulting in 3 rotations for the entire game and still won

In that Sydney game Cotch, Caddy and Graham all had to get treatment in the first quarter from injuries they received.

 

[Tiger_4_Life]

Jamie Elliott
James Aish
Tyson Goldsack
Ben Reid
Adam Treloar
Lynden Dunn
Jordan De Goey
(then add Scharenberg & Howe during the game, plus other injured players on our list like Wells, Broomhead, Appleby, Kirby who are all there and abouts the fringe of the squad)

I'm not going to pretend to know how Bucks would re-arrange the side, I can fairly easily see that you'd probably take Murray, Mayne, Brown and Daicos out straight away. Greenwood maybe too.

Either way, trying to tell us we don't have injuries to a disproportionate number of top-line talent compared to other clubs in the eight is utterly ridiculous. It's not an excuse - we weren't good enough on Saturday and Richmond took advantage of what was in front of them and did their job.

I think the point is that if Collingwood get back most of the guys listed above, things would be very different (read: much closer) in a finals scenario.

Did all those other teams lose two key backs and rely on a two-man bench rotation for half the game? As I said, you can only play what's in front of you but if Collingwood have a full 22 I don't think the margin blows out how it did.

Elliot, goldsack and Reid wouldnt be applying the same pressure as your young blokes did on the weekend tho. And really Elliot hasn't been fit for 2 out of 3 years.

 

[Disco_Stu]

If you bring back those hacks and drop your better performing players then all teams not just Richmond from the top 8 would dine out on Collingwood, those players make you look slow as snails.

Mate, I'm as one-eyed as they come. But Treloar, Elliott, Aish slow? And De Goey would get a game at any AFL side if he was healthy. You're embarrassing yourself.

We can only beat who lines up against us. The Pies were unfortunate with Howe and Sharenberg. That said, I think we had another gear to go if we needed it. Don't think we are exposing our full suite of tactics yet, either. Time will tell.

 

[Tiger Toffee]

Mate, I'm as one-eyed as they come. But Treloar, Elliott, Aish slow? And De Goey would get a game at any AFL side if he was healthy. You're embarrassing yourself.

We can only beat who lines up against us. The Pies were unfortunate with Howe and Sharenberg. That said, I think we had another gear to go if we needed it. Don't think we are exposing our full suite of tactics yet, either. Time will tell.

You know he listed other names as well, put them all together and they are slower.

 

[TimothyJ23]

You know he listed other names as well, put them all together and they are slower.

Geez you really don't know how to conduct a genuine discussion do you?