- Oct 14, 2006
- 23,968
- 17,500
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Richie Vandenberg showed more leadership than all of the above combined so far (Rough excluded)These are just buzz words. Almost every game of AFL is momentum swings. I need a number of specific examples how they have not set standards to accept your point of view.
Alternatively, if you are at the club day in day out I would happily take your point of view.
I love Burgoyne, but he has had one good game this year. But hey, it's easier to criticise Gunston and Bruest.
Neither Gunston or Bruest will ever visibly play a style that people like to see as leadership (physical, crash and bash). I love Hardwick, but this is why you identify him as a leader because he is hard at the ball. Who knows if he has a strong off-field influence on the group. From interviews, he seems very reserved. He reminds me of Stratton in that sense.
Shiels is in the top 3 of tackles per game. That's effort. He is playing at the same standard he has almost his entire career, 20 touches and 8 tackles a game is not below par.
With this point of view, Richie Vandeberg would have been a horrible leader because we lost a heap of games.
You are cherry picking stats and performances period.
If they were leading so well would w have lost three in a row to teams like Brisbane, without any sense of a fight back?