We can rest Gunston against the Tiges or in the bye. No coincidence he has been in our team when we have won.Ins: Watson, Meek
Outs: Gunston (rested), Reeves
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can rest Gunston against the Tiges or in the bye. No coincidence he has been in our team when we have won.Ins: Watson, Meek
Outs: Gunston (rested), Reeves
I cant remember a season where ive seen so many people suggest a player needs a rest.Ins: Watson, Meek
Outs: Gunston (rested), Reeves
I agree. I have been wanting to see us play three talls for years, and we looked so much better for it.We can rest Gunston against the Tiges or in the bye. No coincidence he has been in our team when we have won.
looking more and more like Meek AND Reeves might not be available the weekend.
no problem, Ramma and Chol will do the job.
CJ is definitely working hard and we probably will carry him through his poor form, but on the weekend his opponent finished with 28 and a goal.
I imagine he’d have to be a bit better defensively against the giants if we are to win.
Hang onAfter reading a lot these selection suggestions, it’s easy to see why they are posting on Big Footy and not working at a professional football club…
I want CJ to stay in. Think he needs some continuity and is playing in a new position. He’s only really played half back since joining the club (apart from a small stint up fwd when he was first drafted).Shammy going nowhere. He will lock down Daniels this week. Backline is humming, be mad to change it. Only person I see going out in form in CJ.
If Meeks fit then he comes in for Reeves. Reckon we will unleash Chad after the bye. Plenty of match winning games left in Wingard yet.
Don’t tend to travel well? They won at something like 11 different venues last year, odd take.Just the two changes this week, Meek back in for Reeves if he's fit, and Wiz for Breust (groin management/newborn duties)
As others have said, even if Seamus was on the chopping block (which I don't think he is) GWS is not the team to do that against.
No Cogs, Kelly, Ash, or Perryman for them, and at the moment our midfield and half forwards are humming along nicely, could be another big game for Moore and Ginni.
They're coming off a bye, don't tend to travel well, and it's in Tassie. I think we win this.
Giants still have Coniglio and Kelly out- should really be a great chance for us this week with the game in Tassie
After reading a lot these selection suggestions, it’s easy to see why they are posting on Big Footy and not working at a professional football club…
Don’t tend to travel well? They won at something like 11 different venues last year, odd take.
Just referring to this year specifically since their recent form declineDon’t tend to travel well? They won at something like 11 different venues last year, odd take.
Team rotation is probably a better term than 'rested'. I'm one of the few on here who's backed Gunston all year, but Sam Mitchell has stated his role will be coming in and out of the side – regardless of form – playing his mentor role; so if that means giving Watson some game time, it means he's playing his role. Am hoping we keep him and Breust 2025 to do the same.I cant remember a season where ive seen so many people suggest a player needs a rest.
Im not sure id be swapping out a med/tall who is creating the opportunities that he is for a small. I think we are beyond the point of gifting games because someone is young or had a good week at box hill. This is what happens when you build a squad with depth.Team rotation is probably a better term than 'rested'. I'm one of the few on here who's backed Gunston all year, but Sam Mitchell has stated his role will be coming in and out of the side – regardless of form – playing his mentor role; so if that means giving Watson some game time, it means he's playing his role. Am hoping we keep him and Breust 2025 to do the same.
That's the luxury of depth for sure, but reckon Breust deserves bit of a run from here on. Anyway, I was just going upon our coach's appraisal of why we recruited Gunston. (Though Sam could have easily being bullshitting as a PR spin for dropping a premiership teammate...) Either way, reckon Watson needs to come in.Im not sure id be swapping out a med/tall who is creating the opportunities that he is for a small. I think we are beyond the point of gifting games because someone is young or had a good week at box hill. This is what happens when you build a squad with depth.
Ive got no doubt he's also mentoring on field as well, probably acting as a second voice for Hickmont down forward directing traffic.
I think it would be far better structurally and contribution wise swapping out Breust for him.
Yeah i agree. I would love Watson in. My issue with Breust is that Mitchell has kept saying he's groins aren't great. So i just dont love the idea of playing him over what seems to be a fit and firing Gunston.That's the luxury of depth for sure, but reckon Breust deserves bit of a run from here on. Anyway, I was just going upon our coach's appraisal of why we recruited Gunston. (Though Sam could have easily being bullshitting as a PR spin for dropping a premiership teammate...) Either way, reckon Watson needs to come in.