Because he is a reliable scoring beast.Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Because he is a reliable scoring beast.Why?
JJ never was, and won't be a keeper. He was a mid-price punt for those that were willing to gamble. He will be a stepping stone to greater things, and getting him in late is silly and leaves you chasing your tail for the rest of the year.JJ has a negative BE. Wait another week and he'll cost you more. Get him in now or hold your nerve until about Rd 5. I'll gently suggest he is a way safer bet than Stevie J.
He will probably go up 40k, BE of -9 has to hit 85 to go up 40k so I'd be leaving a little extra if you plan on bringing in JJ after his first price rise. Doggies supporter not starting with JJ?Barlow -> The Smear
Rocky -> Libba
Will review the progress of M.Crouch and the performance of JJ next week. Hopefully won't change in price all that much.
Coming back from a quad, you don't want to have a gander at him first?Because he is a reliable scoring beast.
JJ never was, and won't be a keeper. He was a mid-price punt for those that were willing to gamble. He will be a stepping stone to greater things, and getting him in late is silly and leaves you chasing your tail for the rest of the year.
Have you watched any Bulldogs games so far? Not getting him in will leave you looking silly and chasing the pack imo.JJ never was, and won't be a keeper. He was a mid-price punt for those that were willing to gamble. He will be a stepping stone to greater things, and getting him in late is silly and leaves you chasing your tail for the rest of the year.
I started with him bud, and yes I have watched the Bulldogs games. He will not keep this level of scoring up. He is going to attract a lot of opposition coach attention, just as much as has seemingly grabbed the attention of a lot of Supercoaches. I think Biggs would be a better selection from here on out !!Have you watched any Bulldogs games so far? Not getting him in will leave you looking silly and chasing the pack imo.
I'd hold Gresham rather than trade him to Hewett. There will be other players come along - Petracca, Keays, Mathieson.Gresham > Hewett
Rocky > Blicavs
Hmmm...
That means you started him as a midprice gamble stepping stone to greater things.I started with him bud, and yes I have watched the Bulldogs games.
Barlow > Jack Martin.
Could be forced to trade Gresham as I think he will get dropped. Oliver as well could be a concern
Coming back from a quad, you don't want to have a gander at him first?
I was going for team balance and thought he had the potential to score well, and was a better pick than the alternatives. Turns out I was right, and the same people who criticise this way of picking an initial team are the ones we see in here raging about having to trade Barlow and Rocky, among others !!That means you started him as a midprice gamble stepping stone to greater things.
Exactly what did you expect him to average such that he would satisfy your cash generation requirements, yet not be scoring highly enough to be considered a viable keeper in defence?
Hoping for him to be F6 quality, hopefully 95-100. But more realistically around 90-95. It's just I have no cash to play with in trading Barlow, Zac Merrett is tempting also Rioli. Buddy as well but at 22.3% he isn't a great POD and I'd prefer to keep my side to stay more unconventional as thats how I've stayed away from the carnage so far.I assume you think Jack Martin will be a keeper? What do you think he will average?
So what does he have to score for you to see him as a keeper? I assume after the first two weeks you still believe him to be a stepping stone (fair enough only a 2 week sample size) and who do you plan on stepping up to from JJ?I was going for team balance and thought he had the potential to score well, and was a better pick than the alternatives. Turns out I was right, and the same people who criticise this way of picking an initial team are the ones we see in here raging about having to trade Barlow and Rocky, among others !!
Double downgradeBarlow -> The Smear
Rocky -> Libba
Will review the progress of M.Crouch and the performance of JJ next week. Hopefully won't change in price all that much.
Double downgrade
Because Richmond only win 5% of game without him. It's a scary statistic.Why?
I've fallen so far behind I need the points, so I'm thinking of two sideways trades.Can't do any worse.
You didn't answer my question ...I was going for team balance and thought he had the potential to score well, and was a better pick than the alternatives. Turns out I was right, and the same people who criticise this way of picking an initial team are the ones we see in here raging about having to trade Barlow and Rocky, among others !!
Doesn't get talked about much because of Kennedy, Hannebery, Jack and Parker. And at 563k his at that awkward price for someone like him who you don't think of as an out an out gun like he is behind those 4 guys in the pecking order at Sydney I would assume so do you spend 563k on someone who is the fifth best mid in their team? And probably having too many Sydney mids as well, majority would have at least 1 or 2 of the 4 I mentioned. Thats just my thinking of why people are put off from him, if he keeps it up he is keeper material.Is Tom Mitchell the new Tom Rockliff? Just racks up possessions and tackles. Not getting talked about much either but minus sub games last year averaged 115.
Or those jocks in the sports bet ad.It's two games. Once the goals dry up his scores will drop. I'm not sure he's a must have, if he keeps up this scoring for 4-5 weeks I'll eat my hat.