I hope not
+1.
If he plays it means at least one of Bradshaw, Goodes, White is injured. And i would think Currie and Johnston will be in front of Henry for a spot in the 1's anyway in the forward line. He would be last resort i reckon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I hope not
Good lord NO to Playfair!+1.
If he plays it means at least one of Bradshaw, Goodes, White is injured. And i would think Currie and Johnston will be in front of Henry for a spot in the 1's anyway in the forward line. He would be last resort i reckon.
'Rindsay' Rohan
So who is the second out, hinted at above? Could ROK's ribs be worse than reported? or Mattner's ankle?
How do you know this?Rohan was rested for a half last week, so maybe he was the next in line.
TBH with NicNat one of the mids (maybe Jude) should ignore his man at the centre bounce, wait for Nui to grab the ball out of the centre square and whammo! drop the shoulder (legally) into the rib cage as he tries to Sideshow Bob his way out of the centre. That will learn him...
All this talk of laying a sneaky shot on NicNat is dissapointing. Imagine the West Coast response to all that crap, especially if NicNat ends up copping a hit on sat.
In regards to McGlynn's injury, I'd be great to see Rohan debut, as i'd love to see a fellow ranga in full flight. More realistically it'll be the hard frame of Vesz replacing him.
I didn't say anything dirty, either. Nothing wrong with laying a "tag" on a ruckman who likes to grab the ball from the centre and run instead of tapping. Hit him with a hard, fair tackle and he might think twice before doing it that's all.All this talk of laying a sneaky shot on NicNat is dissapointing. Imagine the West Coast response to all that crap, especially if NicNat ends up copping a hit on sat.
In regards to McGlynn's injury, I'd be great to see Rohan debut, as i'd love to see a fellow ranga in full flight. More realistically it'll be the hard frame of Vesz replacing him.
I didn't say anything dirty, either. Nothing wrong with laying a "tag" on a ruckman who likes to grab the ball from the centre and run instead of tapping. Hit him with a hard, fair tackle and he might think twice before doing it that's all.
If Vez is fit and firing in the twos it becomes a nice "problem" to have to choose between him and Rohan...
All this talk of laying a sneaky shot on NicNat is dissapointing. Imagine the West Coast response to all that crap, especially if NicNat ends up copping a hit on sat.
In regards to McGlynn's injury, I'd be great to see Rohan debut, as i'd love to see a fellow ranga in full flight. More realistically it'll be the hard frame of Vesz replacing him.
I don't think you're taking it anywhere near far enough. There's still no red card rule in the AFL - pick some list clogger from the reserves, give him a crowbar, and tell him to just lay waste to 3-4 key players early on in the match. He'll never play again, but we keep 22 men and the opposition will be stuffed. Probably best to save this tactic for a grand finalForget Jude... Let Mummy do it. Just once. First up. It will just put question marks in NicNat's mind for the rest of the game. Nat goes up, takes the ball, Mumford stays down and when NicNat starts going, Mumford puts him on the deck with his 105 kg frame. NicNat might be a little more tentative contesting the next ruck contest after that.
I've changed my mind- Playfair in for McGlynnI don't think you're taking it anywhere near far enough. There's still no red card rule in the AFL - pick some list clogger from the reserves, give him a crowbar, and tell him to just lay waste to 3-4 key players early on in the match. He'll never play again, but we keep 22 men and the opposition will be stuffed. Probably best to save this tactic for a grand final