The King!
Chosen One
sherb said:Nah, I am still a Blue through and through, but I pay a Swans membership each year to support the club and the game here so I am allowing myself to enjoy their flag.
isnt 16 enough?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
sherb said:Nah, I am still a Blue through and through, but I pay a Swans membership each year to support the club and the game here so I am allowing myself to enjoy their flag.
you now no longer have any cred.nicky said:what suburbs do the saints involve? you fool
and the answer is 'yes' - do you have a point?
The Fireman said:seperating quotes..hmmm, simply pointing out that a certain club no longer exists so it's a bit rich to keep pulling up stats from a non existent entity.
Like PA dragging up stats form their previous existance.
The Fireman said:seperating quotes..hmmm, simply pointing out that a certain club no longer exists so it's a bit rich to keep pulling up stats from a non existent entity.
Like PA dragging up stats form their previous existance.
lol and I am accused with the insults. I brought up Hall to prove a point and I have. I certainly hope and most would that there is no back to back after hearing from some of you guys.swansrule100 said:fireman is clearly a tossa!
bring barry hall back up, is that the arugment?
well if maguire wasnt a little fairy there would of been no report, but the rules let him off!
but what does any of this have to do with the swans chances of back to back
fireman just stop trying to wheel out the old bandwagon rubbish and accept right now your supporting a 2nd rate team that is yet to achieve anything!
That has been done to death here, but for the record I strongly disagree with you.The Fireman said:seperating quotes..hmmm, simply pointing out that a certain club no longer exists so it's a bit rich to keep pulling up stats from a non existent entity.
Like PA dragging up stats form their previous existance.
of course you will, no cred.nicky said:ummm............... yeah................ no, i have made up my mind, i'm going to consolidate the sth and sydney swan cultures with or without you.... ya d***head
The Fireman said:lol and I am accused with the insults. I brought up Hall to prove a point and I have. I certainly hope and most would that there is no back to back after hearing from some of you guys.
To think it was ok for Hall to play pretty much sums you guys up,
The Fireman said:lol and I am accused with the insults. I brought up Hall to prove a point and I have. I certainly hope and most would that there is no back to back after hearing from some of you guys.
To think it was ok for Hall to play pretty much sums you guys up,
Thats fine you can disagree, but I couldn't follow the Saints if they went interstate. To me the Saints for eg being in NSW would represent that state, I am pretty keen on my state of Victoria.sherb said:That has been done to death here, but for the record I strongly disagree with you.
The Swans are a relocated club in the same competition and quite rightly recognize their history prior to the relocation.
The Port Adelaide situation is different, their previous history was in a different competition.
The Fireman said:Thats fine you can disagree, but I couldn't follow the Saints if they went interstate. To me the Saints for eg being in NSW would represent that state, I am pretty keen on my state of Victoria.
Like my pics spanky? goodspanky ham said:Stick to posting pictures fireman. You're embarassing yourself.
Tasmania may get a side in the future, good luck.swansrule100 said:do you actually live in stkilda?
stkilda arent accepting memberships outside the suburb this year?
are you grant thomas?? you talk like he coaches
The Fireman said:Tasmania may get a side in the future, good luck.
same, see ya at York park..your shout.swansrule100 said:dont want it
bad enough we get your rabble down here!!
i will say one thing talking to you has filled in some time cheers!
And that is a choice any Victorian supporter would have to make if his club were to relocate. I am sure there are still a lot of SM supporters who don't support the Swans.The Fireman said:Thats fine you can disagree, but I couldn't follow the Saints if they went interstate. To me the Saints for eg being in NSW would represent that state, I am pretty keen on my state of Victoria.
You know f/all about footy. I bet you're a 16 year old girl. Swans had a dream injury run trhis year.nicky said:we had injuries this year but like the troopers we are we didn't complain and whinge about it (like WCE and st kilda)
Have I said any different?you stick it all up your arsenal, we won the flag this year b/c we were the BEST TEAM!!!
What excuses? Maybe you should quote me on some?ps the excuses are tiresome -
I don't think you're in a position to call anyone else dumb luv. I'm not sure how you worked out I insinuated that the Swans were lucky to win the flag because numerous times I clearly said they deserved to win.i just read your post again and i think the most cringeworthy thing in it (and it was a tough choice) was the 'every thing has to go right' - you are such a dumb p-huck !!!! i believe you are insinuating that we "luckily won the flag"-
As I thought, judging by your abreviated text you could be older than a 16 year old girl. Don't know many 16 year old girls who have a clue about footy.just b/c we dont carry on about our team like the stupid wiggles doesn't mean we're not fantastic, OPEN YOUR EYES YOU FOOL b4 you post rubbish like this!!!!!
Care to quote me where I've "brought it down". Or do you just have an inferior complex? Or maybe you just using this as an excuse to have a gloat?swansrule100 said:here here
we were underestimated all year and we stuck it up em and still people wanna try to bring the achievement down.
we got the cup thats all that matters
go swans!
bunsen burner said:Possible, but I doubt it.
1. Most importantly, as the poster above has mentioned - injuries. Swans had a dream run while St Kilda had a shocker. Be surprised if it happened again.
2. Sydney are not that good. Very few teams win back to back and I don't believe Sydney are in the Brisbane/Adelaide/Hawthorn class. Any of 4 teams could have won the flag this year and Adelaide and Sydney are in same boat. Maybe if St Kilda or Eagles had won they be a reasonable chance for back to back.
3. Sydney don't have that much improvement. Roos got the best out of them. St Kilda and West Coast have some improvement.
I think they'll be right up there again, but everything has to go right again, plus a few things go wrong for St Kilda and West Coast.
bunsen burner said:You know f/all about footy. I bet you're a 16 year old girl. Swans had a dream injury run trhis year.
Have I said any different?
What excuses? Maybe you should quote me on some?
I don't think you're in a position to call anyone else dumb luv. I'm not sure how you worked out I insinuated that the Swans were lucky to win the flag because numerous times I clearly said they deserved to win.
As I thought, judging by your abreviated text you could be older than a 16 year old girl. Don't know many 16 year old girls who have a clue about footy.
Daisy..1 said:...Gee Wizz..You Swans supporters are soo bloody cocky now! Back to back..Three in a row...i have to listen to it each night as i am married to one of you lot.
bunsen burner said:Care to quote me where I've "brought it down". Or do you just have an inferior complex? Or maybe you just using this as an excuse to have a gloat?
If you're older than 16 then you should be embarassed. You come across as no older.nicky said:1. i cannot belive you (an eagles supporter) is challenging me on my age!
Wasn't an insult. Just a an estimate from your intelligence level and propensity to write in abreviated text like teenage girls do.is that all you've got, you opened with that so i fear that is the best you could come up with...
You'll be struggling to convince anyone else you're over 16 too.let's assume that i am 16 (which i'm not btw) most people turn 16 at some stage, you have to turn 16 b4 you get to the pinnacle of whatever the hell superior age you are.! now the reason i'm surprised an EAGLES supporter would be challenging me on my age is you guys ARE about 16 yrs old... the swans have RICH culture that extends past the 100 yr bracket... YOU FOOL!
No very smart are you? Go read what I said: I didn't say the Swans weren't that good to win the flag, but weren't that good to be a odds on chance to go back to back.in post #119 you stated that you had not rebuttled that the swans were the best team and you asked me to highlight where you had stated differently, i have kindly provided you with evidence where you stated differently... might i add i'm getting pi$ed with you for wasting my time- you time wasting fool.!
Once again you expose your severe lack of intelligence. The quote you quoted me had nothing to do with an excuse.you asked me to quote the pathetic excuses - i'm pointing out injuries as a pathetic excuse (again i've provided you with one of your own silly quotes)... every team knows that fitness is an integral part of a successful football team, your ignorance is no longer cute, WIGGLES fan... You ignorant, time wasting FOOL...
Talk it up all you like idiot but it doesn't take an Einstein to work out that you're severely lacking in the brains dept.no really i'm saying you are not very bright (there you go, i've softened it for you) you unintelligent, time wasting, ignorant fool