Review The good, the bad, the shat - vs Fremantle R3 2024

[George Kramer]

100%. He was happy to like the posts digging up things that 1970crow had previously said (see the Draper cohort thread). Bit different when it's a poster he actually likes though.

Is that right Mostyn? Surely you’re not a hypocrite?

 

[skam85]

Are you saying people can't change their mind?

I think this targeting of Wayne is ridiculous.

Maybe he thinks Nicks is a decent coach but made some errors? Maybe he thinks we played bad AND had injuries? Maybe people can hold two ideas in their mind at the same time?

Maybe he should come and explain this which is what the posters are asking for.

He doesn't need defending by a soggy lettuce.

 

[skam85]

This is the stupidest thing I've ever read on this board.

Liar, you definitely come across as the kind of person who goes back and reads their own posts

 

[Cap]

Is there much Crows discussion happening on Bluesky?

I've jumped off twitter and I'm not that interested in going back.

Yeah bluesky is limited. I think the Crows official just joined up, mainly duplicate of what's on X.

The AFL feed has grown over the last couple of months, here is the one I have

Bluesky

bsky.app

 

[1970crow]

Lol is that your take? Considering Wayne held that view for weeks, nah it wasn’t in the heat of the loss.

You’re just ignoring his posting style because he’s aligned with your sucky views.

Even if it was in the heat of the loss, how often has Waynus posted that ‘most footy supporters post emotionally’ as a put down to those that don’t agree with him.

 

[1970crow]

100%. He was happy to like the posts digging up things that 1970crow had previously said (see the Draper cohort thread). Bit different when it's a poster he actually likes though.

Hypocrisy is rampant.

 

[FR0GGY]

You do you - personally, I can't keep track of point scoring between posters trying to win internet arguments.

If the accusation is that Wayne said one thing in the aftermath of a loss and then said something different once he'd considered it further - well, I don't see how that is an issue. Some of the comments around here after a loss are nuts, and most folks probably want to take them back once they've calmed down.

I think it's a sign of intelligence to consider things further and sometimes to change your mind. I can't see the issue.

The crux of the issue is that because he’s a mod somewhere else he can’t be put on ignore.
Hypocrisy will always get pickup up on, some do it more than others so they will get quoted more often.

 

[baldandbroke]

You do you.

Thanks for the permission, I always do. Who do you do, someone else?

 

[tinman]

This is the stupidest thing I've ever read on this board.

There’s certainly plenty of competition for that title.

*Disclaimer. I am not paid by the AFL or AFC. Any views or opinions expressed on this board, by me, are my own and are given freely without any financial benefit or inducement.

 

[Mostyn]

The crux of the issue is that because he’s a mod somewhere else he can’t be put on ignore.
Hypocrisy will always get pickup up on, some do it more than others so they will get quoted more often.

Yeah, fair.

If someone is a mod that they become impossible to have on ignore anywhere on the site is frustrating.