Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Didn’t say he had to be worth it, only that by paying it the Eagles might have a much better draft hand than they would otherwiseI believe you are referring to fairy land, where everyone rides on unicorns to work, Football is played using fairy floss and the elves will sell you a jar of rainbows on the cobbled street-corners. This is the world where Graham commands a contract like the above
He hasn't got the size, nor sure if he will fill out, but more importantly I don't see the competitive mongrel in him to make up for any other short comings.Yeah look mate I try to stay pretty positive about AFL players because I’ve known quite a few guys that haven’t made it but under different circumstances probably had the talent but yeah I just don’t see it with Samson either. Let’s hope he proves us all wrong
You’ve missed your calling.Everyone else does it
Freo sells 9, 10 & 17 to WC for 3 & 23.
We get 3 & (Freo’s existing) 27 for Shai, and from WC we get 10, the Hawks Barrass pick (12), or more likely 17 for Baker.
WC turns 3 & 23 into Baker, 9, 10 & Graham, Freo gets Shai & we get 3, 6, 10/12/17, 20 & 22 (Graham comp).
Add 6 & 20 (ideally 13 but would need to help them out with plenty more points going back) for Rioli & then trade later picks for Brisbane’s 1st.
1, 3, 6, 10/12/17, (say) 14, 20, 21, 22, 27
It’s not hard
I hope we are looking at Nathan O’Driscoll from Freo.
Agree, but I would view that as a role Hopper could take on rather than Graham. We have Hopper on the list for 5 more years, might be the best way to get our value out of him.
Confusing.Everyone else does it
Freo sells 9, 10 & 17 to WC for 3 & 23.
We get 3 & (Freo’s existing) 27 for Shai, and from WC we get 10, the Hawks Barrass pick (12), or more likely 17 for Baker.
WC turns 3 & 23 into Baker, 9, 10 & Graham, Freo gets Shai & we get 3, 6, 10/12/17, 20 & 22 (Graham comp).
Add 6 & 20 (ideally 13 but would need to help them out with plenty more points going back) for Rioli & then trade later picks for Brisbane’s 1st.
1, 3, 6, 10/12/17, (say) 14, 20, 21, 22, 27
It’s not hard
Hey Michael,I'm leaning towards option 2.
I think this is part of a good will dealing with WCE.
We get a better than expected compo pick for Graham and will accept a pick in the 20's for Baker instead of asking for the Barrass compo pick.
they get to keep their high compo pick, we get a little over for Graham and with the Baker pick end up with 2 picks in the early 20's
Would you do 6/10 for 2 then you haveI've just gone shopping for hats as I said i would eat my hat if some of those trades happen that have been fantasized about
View attachment 2101086
Haven't bought it yet but it's very close.
Imagine:
Bolton for pick 9 & 10
Rioli for pick 6 & 20
Baker & 9 for pick 3
Gee, that might ease my stomach a bit from the thought of Graham and 4 more years.
Trade 39,41 & 47 to Brisbane for pick 14
Hit the draft with:
1,3,6,10,14,20,21,29
would it be 9/14 for 2 ??Would you do 6/10 for 2 then you have
1/2/3/14/20/21/29
I thought we were talking more as inside midfield protection for the younger kids? This is something I believe Hopper could, or at least could learn to do.Hopper has different attributes to Graham. It would be more like Taranto being interchangeable with Graham.
I think it would have to be 6 and 10 to get it donewould it be 9/14 for 2 ??
1,2,3,6 10 ***K ME!!
Hi mate,Hey Michael,
there saying pick 3 is on the table for baker, obviously something going back...
I thought we were talking more as inside midfield protection for the younger kids? This is something I believe Hopper could, or at least could learn to do.
That would leave TT to rotate more through the forward line which I think will suit him more.
I'm petty and would prefer 4 single digit picks so they can have Baker + 10Hi mate,
i nearly fell off my chair when i saw that! ha ha.
one idea we floated at work (I'm sure others have mentioned it too) was:
Rich get: Picks 9 and 10 (freo)
Freo get: Bolton, maybe a 2nd or 3rd rounder?
then
Rich get: pick 3
WCE get: Baker and pick 9.
would give us:
1, 3, 6 (rioli), 10
No idea if that works or not, but its going to be fascinating!
Oh look we’ve got Mr Details in the house.You’ve missed your calling.
If you could get those picks you’re advocating and declaring are not hard, I want you as senior negotiator for the RFC. HOWEVER as you have both WC and Richmond with pick 10 I think you may be a little off the mark.
Our 4 exiting dudes for 3, 6, (one of) 10/12/17, 20, 22, 27. Plus later selections for 14. I’d do thatConfusing.
When the Richmond CEO Dunne said that it will require 'extraordinary deals'. He didn't mean for the other teams.
Sort of irrelevant. Taranto, Prestia, Hopper make Graham's situation pretty untenable. We finished last, what do you propose, we do it again? We need to change things up. Hopper is the next on the line of good enough players that have to get pushed out for us to improve. Graham will get us a good return, this year only.Graham works insanely hard and is an elite runner this talk of him being to slow based on blokes at home watching tv and seeing him slip out of frame a couple of times a game actually doesn’t recognise just how good a worker he is
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
You cheeky campaigner, you ****n massive campaignerGraham signs on
Jack Graham will remain a Richmond player after signing a a new four year deal
Graham signs on
Jack Graham will remain a Richmond player after signing a a new three-year contract.www.richmondfc.com.au
hard to argue that line of thinking to be fair, I like your proposal!I'm petty and would prefer 4 single digit picks so they can have Baker + 10
No chanceWould you do 6/10 for 2 then you have
1/2/3/14/20/21/29