I don't want Tarrant. His price would be too high, and he wouldn't cope in the Perth Fish bowl.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Reveler said:I don't want Tarrant. His price would be too high, and he wouldn't cope in the Perth Fish bowl.
Given the state of his knees I could see JLo develop into a super-sub. He gets 40-50 minutes a match. He's handy down forward but has played some of his best footy around the ground. He's also a very good at clearances.pinkus maximus said:yeah i agree about targeting midfielders but there doesnt seem to be any available
also I dont think Longmuir will ever be 50 goal forward,hes pretty much a second string ruckmen who can go forward and create a contest
pinkus maximus said:remember this time last year the papers were saying were giving up pick 10 for Hay
dominguez said:We offered pick 10 and Ryley Dunn. The roos offered 2 first round picks, but the hawks told us we could have Hay for pick 10 and Ryan Murphy. The club considered this deal but rejected it, and we dodged a bullet.
We should have learnt from last year and the Croad saga not to sell the farm for KPP with issues. If Tarrant thinks by moving to Fremantle he will avoid the spotlight he is sadly mistaken.
Rob said:Today's Australian has us trading pick 13 and Polak to Richmond for Pick 8, which would then be on traded for Tarrant and/or Solomon.
Pick 13 alone is barely worth Tarrant, I would be fair dinkum ropeable if that happened.
ImperialPurple said:I have been a staunch defender of Freo's trading since CC & co arrived, but if they do this trade (Polak + 1st rounder + another player for Tarrant), then they deserve all the shyte they will cop over it.
ImperialPurple said:I have been a staunch defender of Freo's trading since CC & co arrived, but if they do this trade (Polak + 1st rounder + another player for Tarrant), then they deserve all the shyte they will cop over it.
Vintage said:I agree that we don't really NEED Tarrant in 2007, but what if Pav wasn't there...
Ripper said:Very astute point Vintage. Because He fronts up every week We tend to ignore the fact that He could actually get injured.
theGav56 said:Tarrant would not be a backup player, he would be in our best 22. Polak at this stage is the Pavlich backup.
theGav56 said:Tarrant would not be a backup player, he would be in our best 22. Polak at this stage is the Pavlich backup.