What extra? They just want our F2 but we want something back.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Welcome Welcome to Adelaide: James Peatling - Traded with F3, F4 for F2
- Thread starter Scorpus
- Start date
- Tagged users None
We wouldn't need anything back because we'd already have the F3 that Melbourne would have sent back if we didn't roll over before brunch.
Oh well if it doesnt happen we have that list spot open.
GameofSloanes
Norm Smith Medallist
Surely GWS aren't going to do the same
Got a few hours yet!
CrouchPotato
Rookie
- Oct 23, 2015
- 32
- 55
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What time does the fat lady sing?
- Dec 29, 2000
- 25,519
- 23,857
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Just give them the F2 that they want and get the deal done.
Why bother haggling in this instance?
Why bother haggling in this instance?
CrouchPotato
Rookie
- Oct 23, 2015
- 32
- 55
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Many thanks.
Yeah what are we expecting back? A F3 or F4 or something? Do we really expect to get anything worthwhile with that to make it worth burning this deal?
- Jul 6, 2017
- 31,584
- 45,313
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe we are holding the F2 for draft night - maybe to try and trade with North for pick 2 (ie 4 + F2 for 2 if North are happy to take any one of Lalor, FOS, Smith)? But if we could get GWS F2 back as part of it or trade a few F3's for him, it still allows something possible to happen on the night like that.
Thrillthorpe7
All Australian
- Aug 22, 2024
- 740
- 1,633
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It does seem a bit odd this is dragging out so long, but then I didn't think GWS and Essendon would be haggling over a pick in the 40s or 50s for Stringer. List managers just seem obsessed with winning every aspect of a trade. This deal, Parker and Stringer should have been done last week, yet here we are.
Is Peatling worth a 2nd rounder? You can get good players in the draft if you are good at that pick.
Which is a fold itself, we didn't need to do that, if he ended up at Port, stiff poo. And once Peatling chose us, we could have just gone back and said shit's changed.
Yep but then we’d be folding for Peatling by giving the extra
Peatling is worth a second rounder. ANB worth a second with change coming back. But at the end of the day, you only pay what you have to pay. We're negotiating hard with Peatling, but we didn't with ANB and now we're potentially paying the price for lazily leaving value in Melbournes hands that we should have gotten.
The AFL hold back approving or at least releasing, agreed deals to make it seem like an exciting and dramatic finish. It keeps everyone looking for updates all day.
I'm certain Peatling is one that has been agreed by all parties and held back for a bit of drama.
- Dec 29, 2000
- 25,519
- 23,857
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
TubbsFarquhar
TheBrownDog
Odds on any of Richmond, North or the Eagles swooping in in the PSD?
I don't understand our position here, a F2 is more than reasonable.
Well done Sam, doing his job trying to keep the viewers engaged with the deadline day charade.
It will get done. The concern for the PSD is likely us (WCE) - we had strong interest in him. Richmond and Norf nothing from what has been reported. If James has committed to/wants to go to the Crows, it will happen even with the PSD you’d think.
It will get done. The concern for the PSD is likely us (WCE) - we had strong interest in him. Richmond and Norf nothing from what has been reported. If James has committed to/wants to go to the Crows, it will happen even with the PSD you’d think.
Similar threads
