Banter Who will be Better in 2025, Collingwood or Carlton? Part 4

Banter threads are not to be taken too seriously. Have fun. Let others have fun.

Who will be better in 2025

  • Collingwood

    Votes: 105 51.2%
  • Carlton

    Votes: 100 48.8%

  • Total voters
    205

Remove this Banner Ad

That thread is a bit of fun, despite the delusions, but to falsify facts, repeatedly, while trying demean the comprehension of others, that's another level of bizarre
Go on then show us where Fadge said "he averaged as many hard ball gets as Bont and Petracca" when he produced that table? Tick tock

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Cool must have missed it, which post number again?

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
"And then we're told that they're not 'hard ball gets', and then we highlight that he averages as many hard ball gets as the likes of Petracca, Heeney, Warner and Bontempelli.

And then they crawl back into their holes."
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This is a crucial stat if teams such as Adelaide underperformed as badly as they did last year.
Amazing that Carlton and Brisbane did as well as they did with that many best 22 games missed.

To be fair, the average poster on this website would be more tactically astute than your coach. I know Carlton has crazy vossy, but still.
 
Oh wow from another thread, stylish

Anyhow, another correct statement by Fadge, a general statement dishonestly represented, "as the likes of" is a lot different from "as"

View attachment 2184905

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Go on then show us where Fadge said "he averaged as many hard ball gets as Bont and Petracca" when he produced that table? Tick tock

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I just gave you what you asked for. Odd to ask for the above if you thought it was an accurate statement.
 
Wrong thread, nuffy?

Or are you so obsessed with trying to punch down on St. Kilda, that they are constantly sub consciously in your pickled brain?
I understand you get a tad confused by numbers Fudgee - read into them anyway you like - they dont change. Notice I made no comment - just posted some numbers posted by another person from an article in August.

Ive noticed there ha been NO commentary from you dirty birders...nothing to see of interst there?
 
Still can't see the post number

On SM-A225F using BigFooty.com mobile app
He must be imaging again.

To be fair, I did write Heeney and it autocorrected to Bontempelli.

Nonetheless, all the data was there in the original post #5415.

Daicos also 'had Bont covered at the same age'...
 
Last edited:
I understand you get a tad confused by numbers Fudgee - read into them anyway you like - they dont change. Notice I made no comment - just posted some numbers posted by another person from an article in August.

Ive noticed there ha been NO commentary from you dirty birders...nothing to see of interst there?
There have actually lots of comments when that article has been previously posted.

1. Questioning who were regarded as best 22 for both teams. I mean, it makes a pretty big difference if Silvagni was or wasn't included for Carlton, for example. That question went unanswered.

2. I also shared some data around the clear best 18 players missing large chunks of games - that is, more than 6 games. The only CLEAR best 18 player Carlton had miss more than 6 games was Cerra with 11. Docherty may be included at a stretch with 22 missed games. So that's two players. Best 18 Collingwood players who missed more than 6 games were McStay (18), Mitchell (17), Mihocek (12), De Goey (10) and Elliott (8). Cox (7) is in the same boat as Docherty as fringe best 18. Again, 'nothing to see here from the Carlton folk'.

So any other data you want to blindly share, without understanding it yourself, that you're going to accuse other posters of ignoring?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Banter Who will be Better in 2025, Collingwood or Carlton? Part 4

Back
Top