2016 Trade/FA discussion (no hypothetical trades)

[Milux]

Port havent used a 1st round pick in last 2 years so doubtful they will be trading 9 unless it involves getting our 1st round - 19

19 isnt a first rounder though is it.

 

[cammo6556]

Fairly certain he was/is there for Redden's bucks.

Actually my mate did mention Redden's bucks, but I didnt catch the exact context. Makes sense.

Question to be asked is why Reddens bucks is in Sydney when hes an SA boy who played in QLD and WA.

 

[dlanod]

Brett Anderson walking back the imminentness of the deal:

 

[WhiteLionFeva]

Interesting observation about being worked into the ground. Maybe more about his injuries than anything else.

 

[dlanod]

Actually my mate did mention Redden's bucks, but I didnt catch the exact context. Makes sense.

Question to be asked is why Reddens bucks is in Sydney when hes an SA boy who played in QLD and WA.

Not much else to do anywhere else in Australia.

 

[mikey127]

Brett Anderson walking back the imminentness of the deal:

Hey guys sorry to be a pain but is anyone able to copy and paste some of this tweets. Sitting here on a work computer that allows big footy but doesn't allow social media so it blanks out all the tweets.

 

[Carlos Danger]

19 isnt a first rounder though is it.

End ofround 1 according to afl.com

Would still let port bank a 1st round pick in the draft which they have to do this yr & next

 

[cammo6556]

Not much else to do anywhere else in Australia.

Well I guess there's that perception...

Maybe he was trying to be geographically friendly for everyone

 

[dlanod]

Hey guys sorry to be a pain but is anyone able to copy and paste some of this tweets. Sitting here on a work computer that allows big footy but doesn't allow social media so it blanks out all the tweets.

That's a fair point. In this case I'm a bit all over the place so don't necessarily have time to do it myself, but since you asked so nicely...

"Deal isn't confirmed...in fact some way off. Plenty of options being thrown up."

 

[dlanod]

Well I guess there's that perception...

Maybe he was trying to be geographically friendly for everyone

Bucks at Uluru, confirmed!

 

[Bucking Beads]

Would we be chasing Ah Chee or would that be the Suns?? He's a small forward isn't he?

 

[PillyBilgrim]

Would we be chasing Ah Chee or would that be the Suns?? He's a small forward isn't he?

Fairly certain he requested a trade to the Suns to be with his brother.

 

[dlanod]

Would we be chasing Ah Chee or would that be the Suns?? He's a small forward isn't he?

He's requested a trade to the Suns to play with his brother.

 

[Crawb]

Would we be chasing Ah Chee or would that be the Suns?? He's a small forward isn't he?

Suns are. Not sure how two picks in the 20s will land them both Hanley & Ah Chee though. They'd have to be giving up something else to Port if we're receiving their 2017 first rounder (which is about right for Hanley).

 

[cammo6556]

Bucks at Uluru, confirmed!

Original, if not dusty and slighty sweaty

 

[Carlos Danger]

Would we be chasing Ah Chee or would that be the Suns?? He's a small forward isn't he?

Brother is at the suns i think

 

[dlanod]

Suns are. Not sure how two picks in the 20s will land them both Hanley & Ah Chee though. They'd have to be giving up something else to Port if we're receiving their 2017 first rounder (which is about right for Hanley).

Wonder if our 2017 third rounder would be involved going to Port. That'd balance things out a bit.

 

[Figjam17]

Xavier Richards, are we a chance? Do we want to be a chance?

 

[Hollow Knight]

Wouldn't it be more logical that the Suns get Port's 2017 first rounder and we get one of the Suns top 10 picks?

Meets the needs of both of us. Maybe our 31 goes to Port to balance it? Meaning we trade Hanley and 31 for 10 or something.

Edit: ok we don't have 31 but yeah...

 

[Lionmoe21]

Wouldn't it be more logical that the Suns get Port's 2017 first rounder and we get one of the Suns top 10 picks?

Meets the needs of both of us. Maybe our 31 goes to Port to balance it? Meaning we trade Hanley and 31 for 10 or something.

Makes more sense

 

[Crawb]

Wouldn't it be more logical that the Suns get Port's 2017 first rounder and we get one of the Suns top 10 picks?

Meets the needs of both of us.

Good call. Prestia and O'Meara would land the Suns with Picks 4, 6, 8, 10 this year. Surely they would prefer to balance that out over a few years to maximise the ability to grab talent.

 

[Biggies]

Robbo: Expect the Hanley to Suns deal to be done today... first round or future first round ...

 

[The Flying Belgian]

I'm now expecting the Hanley trade to be done today, tomorrow and Friday week.

 

[WhiteLionFeva]

Wouldn't it be more logical that the Suns get Port's 2017 first rounder and we get one of the Suns top 10 picks?

Meets the needs of both of us. Maybe our 31 goes to Port to balance it? Meaning we trade Hanley and 31 for 10 or something.

Do you mean 21? We traded what is now 31 to GWS. 21 would be overs wouldn't you think?

 

[Carlos Danger]

Wouldn't it be more logical that the Suns get Port's 2017 first rounder and we get one of the Suns top 10 picks?

Meets the needs of both of us. Maybe our 31 goes to Port to balance it? Meaning we trade Hanley and 31 for 10 or something.

Port definately need to keep a first rounder. 2015 they had first pick in the 30s & 2014 first pick in the 50s