2019 2nd Ashes Test - Lords 14-18 August 2019

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Your defence of Warner is about as sound as his defence against a moving ball. Even more when you compare his awful overseas form to class players like Kohli who make overseas tons for fun.

Kohli's poor record in England came from a single series in 2014. He avenged that record as soon as India returned in 2018, scoring 2 tons in the first 3 tests and averaging something huge for the series in tricky conditions while most of his teammates failed.

Warner has played tests in 3 separate series in England now and doesn't look any closer to conquering the conditions.
His also coming off a 12 month ban. Not everyone can be like Smith.

Warner’s overseas form has not been great but instead of just potting him list some alternatives.
Bancroft who averages in the 20s?
Harris who failed in Aus and averages 30?
Finch who averages in the 20s? Joe Burns who also has a poor away record?
Renshaw yes I will admit I am a fan of him and still have hope for him as a long term prospect but hasn’t been able to hit it off the square since last county season.

Considering that Warner is a lot more secure at the top than Bancroft at the moment you would have to come up with two viable replacements.

Also despite not having a great record in England he made 418 runs at 46 with 5 50s in 2015 so his record isn’t actually as bad as everyone is desperate to make it out to be
 
I think the criticism for Warner is happening for a combination of reasons, not just one.
- Does not seem like the best bloke out there
- Has been all over the shop in England and Broad looks like he figured him out.
- Hasn't shown enough away from home.
- Steve Smith playing like a generational talent in the last test even though he was suspended as well therefore Warner needs to do the same. i.e. Smith is that good.
- May have lost his aggressiveness with the bat as he has to tone it down under Langer.
- Langer and Hayden were world class openers and Warner can't quite match them in general away from home (i.e. the golden generation was great)
 
Do still have high hopes for Renshaw personally. No I’m not saying pick him now

Historically Aus have often had 2 or 3 outstanding or at the least capable batsmen to call upon. The reality is at the minute we have zero. Forget Burns, Renshaw would be a walking wicket in these conditions and Harris I fear would be similar providing the Poms with slips catching practice...
 
While we're spitballing potential ways to drop an opener, what do people think of promoting Khawaja to open, shifting Smith to 3 and bringing someone into the middle order? Don't think it'd be any worse than bringing in Burns/Harris, and opening could reduce the amount struggling to rotate the strike hurts Ussie, but might be too radical a change for mid-series, especially while we're doing well despite the openers.
 
Even though Renshaw is nowhere near selection right now I do have a soft spot for him. Him trying his damn hardest to survive on those Indian minefields where it was pretty hard to score won me over for a period of time. Should have been up 2-0 that series too if we weren't so silly in the final innings. And then he couldn't buy a run in the Sheffield shield once spring rolled around.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Got my first taste of Ashes cricket at Lords and was a ripper experience as expected. Very dusty today. Originally went in or day 2 and 3 on the ballot. Pretty happy I only got tickets to the one day now.

Thought we bowled pretty well, without bowling great (Hazelwood aside who was fantastic). Rolling a team for under 260 in the first innings of any test is generally pretty good going, but we lost our way a bit during their two half century stands and feel we might have gifted them 50 or so runs. That's before taking into account dropping two sitters off Burns.

But then on other days Hazelwood, with a bit more luck getting the edge or beating the bat for lbw's, could have run through a batting lineup ala McGrath and his 8/38. 2/14 off 10 at lunch is a brilliant return and that still didn't do justice to how well he bowled I thought.

All in all a slight edge to us I feel but nothing significant or match defining at all.

Also I hope Pat Cummins has been facing up to some short stuff in the nets because he is going to cop it when he comes to the crease. No problems with a sustained period of short bowling like that - and a number of the English are not great with the short ball - but I feel like 1 or 2 fuller balls each over would have really put some doubt into the batsmen's minds.
 
Give a young batsman a chance to play at the elite level.
It's the Australian cricket team. No-one should be given anything.
A young batsman should earn the chance to play at elite level by making runs in first class cricket.
 
At this stage if Harris scores 30 in the remaining tests we will be 50 runs ahead each test of what Warner is giving us

No we won’t because Harris won’t even score 30. I’ll stick with the bloke that has 21 test tons
 
At this stage if Harris scores 30 in the remaining tests we will be 50 runs ahead each test of what Warner is giving us
Settle down big boy. Openers who average 48 in test cricket over a long period of time are worth their weight in gold. You don't drop them after a couple of failures.
 
While we're spitballing potential ways to drop an opener, what do people think of promoting Khawaja to open, shifting Smith to 3 and bringing someone into the middle order? Don't think it'd be any worse than bringing in Burns/Harris, and opening could reduce the amount struggling to rotate the strike hurts Ussie, but might be too radical a change for mid-series, especially while we're doing well despite the openers.
I would add to this suggestion by querying whether Warner would be better value in the middle order than opening in England.

Has any of the hyper aggressive openers worked in England in the last 30 years? Hayden hasn't, Warner hasn't, Sehwag hasn't. Maybe we shouldn't force it and hope it works this time.

2nd innings I would seriously consider:

1. Bancroft
2. Khawaja
3. Smith
4. Warner
 
Also with Warner the lack of team success in England hurts him.

In 2015 he made 418 runs at 46 with 5 50s behind only Smith Rogers and Root. If we win that series his performance is perceived differently, people look back now at him and he is one of the players who carry the blame for that unsuccessful campaign.

In reality he did his job, we lost that series because from 4-7 yielded 604 runs at 19.5. It wasn’t Warner who let the side down.
 
While we're spitballing potential ways to drop an opener, what do people think of promoting Khawaja to open, shifting Smith to 3 and bringing someone into the middle order? Don't think it'd be any worse than bringing in Burns/Harris, and opening could reduce the amount struggling to rotate the strike hurts Ussie, but might be too radical a change for mid-series, especially while we're doing well despite the openers.
We have about as many middle order bats knocking down the door as we do openers. We're playing Wade as a specialist batsman, ffs (not a knock on Wade, he's earnt his spot, but in generations past, he wouldn't have stood a chance).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2019 2nd Ashes Test - Lords 14-18 August 2019

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top